Talk:Blackjack Switch

Gambling Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Page name

Arguably the name of the page should be "Blackjack Switch"..Zargulon (talk) 22:38, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Tables either cap it or use all caps. The TM is all caps. The patent is "Blackjack push" and really irrelevant. Geoff, the patent holder, caps it.Objective3000 (talk) 00:26, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:06, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blackjack switch → Blackjack Switch — See discussion above. Zargulon (talk) 01:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support per Objective's comments and per Snyder's "Big book of blackjack". Zargulon (talk) 01:56, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Inventor and year

If anyone knows this or even better has a reliable source for it, please insert. Also does anyone know where the game resides on the web? Blackjackswitch.com seems to be dead. Zargulon (talk) 17:24, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Geoff Hall designed it in 2009. See http://www.qfit.com/book/ModernBlackjackPage36.htm. But I'm not adding the ref as I'm tired of people criticizing me for adding refs.Objective3000 (talk) 17:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me. Zargulon (talk) 17:31, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Blackjack Switch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110225104522/http://www.blackjackswitch.com:80/ to http://www.blackjackswitch.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:59, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]