Talk:Bell 214

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bell 214 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Aviation: Rotorcraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the rotorcraft project.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

214ST pic

Meggar, good start on the article. I hope you don't mind my improvements. Good pic on the 214B. We could still use a good 214ST pic. [1] has some interesting shots of a captured Iraqi ST from the 1991 Gulf War, but I don't know how to go about getting permission to use them. Its a skid-type, so I wouuldn't mind a pic of a wheeled ST also (preferably civilian, like one used for oil ops).

I filled out specs for the 214A and 214ST with all the data I had available, but they are still incomplete. I'll be looking for a source to fill out a History section, and will probably cut the Variants section down to just a bullet list at that time. For now, the Variants section looks fine to me. I've sourced almost everything except the "Present use" section. Feel free to note anything you notice needs to be worked on, or want to see added. Thanks. -- BillCJ 00:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks BillCJ, it's only good if we all edit. I will make some small changes to some of these articles that you won't agree with, but just because of a different point of view. Meggar 04:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. I've made a number of changes on various pages this week, some of which I'm sur3e others won' be happy with. I noticied you corrected the infobox title on the AW139 page. Thanks. It was late when I put that in. You've probably noticed another change I made with that page, and the AW149. The AW149 page was only 3 lines long, so I didn't feel I needed to discuss merging it. I don't think AW has even sold any as yet. But, as long as you're not putting the AW149 as a decendent of the 204, I can probably live with whatever changes you make. - BillCJ 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Bell 214/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Born2flie: Not even close to anything but Stub status. --17:47, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 17:47, 31 December 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 09:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bell 214. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Ahunt (talk) 12:29, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bell 214. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]