Talk:Battle of Albulena

Battle of Albulena has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 24, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Albulena article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Balkan / European / Ottoman / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force
	Ottoman military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Former countries: Ottoman Empire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ottoman Empire (assessed as Low-importance).

Albania Mid‑importance

	Battle of Albulena is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Search for references

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL - acknowledge I should have checked this before proposing deletion. Addhoc 23:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:13, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Ujëbardha → Battle of Albulena — As per WP:UCN. Albulena is the most common English name for the battle (Compare: [1] to [2]). Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 02:13, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Albulena/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: - Jarry1250 ^{[Who? Discuss.]} 14:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commencing review.

Comments:

File:Assault_on_Turkish_encampment.jpg - needs a modern-day source; would benefit from being moved to Commons.
File:Sueleymanname_Akinci-Beys.png - needs a modern-day source; could do with a better file description page generally.
I have copyedited the article: not changed much, but you should check anyway. I have added in a few clarifys, too.

Extra recommendations:

Find a map

Otherwise, looks good to me. In fact, I normally find much more to say than just the above :P Regards, - Jarry1250 ^{[Who? Discuss.]} 14:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to review this article. Your copyedits are very good, I just fixed some typos here and there.
The first image I got from a modern publication of Demetrio Franco's book. Would giving this work? As for the second image, I did not upload this so I can't say for sure where it was found. I have seen it before though but this is not something which I could source.
I have tried to clarify everything. For the quarter-century long war part, I made it so it was Skanderbeg's personal war.
I also added a map.
Let me know what you think!--Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 21:11, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That would be fine as a source, yes. The other source is not vital (since the copyright status is trivially established), but if you could take a moment to try to find it anywhere that would be good.

The clarify resolutions seem perfect.

I like having a map. It might also be nice to have a slightly more zoomed out "historical context" style map, done in SVG format. Are you familiar with using a program like Inkscape? I'm happy to give you a hand by creating a blank map you could mark the borders on if you had a map to hand you could use as a source.

Nonetheless, this is clearly a good article by quite a margin. I am therefore going to pass it. Regards, - Jarry1250 ^{[Who? Discuss.]} 14:41, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A date and the place of the battle

I noticed that Babinger wrote about September 2, 1457. This source is already quoted, and I believe noticed, especially taking in consideration that untill a couple of months ago, this was the date written in the infobox and lede. But then suddenly, the date was changed without explanation. It was significant change and required explanation, at least in the edit line. Therefore I politely remind the main contributor to this article not to make significant changes without explanation, at least in the edit description.

There is another well known historian who wrote about the date of this battle. It is Kenneth M. Setton. But he did not write that the date was September 24, he only wrote about the letter which was dated September 24, and which describes this battle.

Both Babinger and wrote that the place of this battle was Tomorrit (Tomoritsa), Mount Tomor (Maje Tomorrit) which is 11miles east of Berat. But this article doesn't mention Tomorrit. On the other hand Babinger and Setton do not mention Abulena.

I propose to double check the sources about the date and the place of this battle.

--Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:40, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The main contributor to this article changed the date of the battle to September 2, 1457 per above comment.Y
The place of the battle remained Lac according to Frasheri although Babinger placed it on Tomorrit.N--Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strength

Telegraf news source say that Ottomam had 50k troops and Skandberg had 17k troops butAlbanian nationalists exxgreate strengths.Why? İnfo table just has 1 citutation about strengths and this source say them. 78.175.229.155 (talk) 17:32, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since when did a poorly written political online newspaper become a source since I don't remember Balliu1 (talk) 16:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The numbers

Every source says that the numbers were 10k Vs 80k so can I get an explanation who changed the numbers Balliu1 (talk) 16:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]