Talk:Battle of Tell El Kebir

Military history: British / European / Middle East

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Very poor syntax throughout

Anyone care to fix this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.101.17.36 (talk) 09:47, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Last fight in red coats?

I have read that this battle was the British Army's last engagement fought in their once-signal red coats. But this was only a passing mention in the source I read--neither a general British Army history nor a discussion of the Anglo-Egyptian war--so I'm hesitant to cite it here. But if this is in fact true, I would expect it to be known among people who actually are students of British military history, and to rate a mention here. Anyone? Spark240 (talk) 23:45, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone out there is still interested, the 'red coat' was last worn in battle, on perhaps a couple of occasions, in the Sudan campaigns of 1884-85; last worn on campaign in West Africa on the Ashanti expedition of 1895. The intended purpose was to cowe what was seen as primitive-minded opposition. JF42 (talk) 13:00, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Information

Editors working on this piece could find this article to be of interest. Farawayman (talk) 17:41, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well into the 21st century

As I don't know the context of the quote, I do not know what a sensible edit would be (was it meant to read twentieth century?).

To say that the "British trained officer corps of Egypt retained its traditional role as the centrality of Egyptian government well into the 21st century" seems bizzare as we have only completed a tenth of the 21st century. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.237.199.248 (talk) 12:50, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Background

A part of "Background" reads, "...an ultimatum was sent to the Egyptian government demanding..."

Who specifically sent the ultimatum? The Anglo-French fleet? The current wording is both passive voice and ethnocentric, implying "we" sent the ultimatum.

So the Invaders won.

Like the Taliban, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Insurgents, Civilians defending against an invasion, Kebab munchers whatever you want to call them "Defending their Homeland"

TV filling western heads with "OH LOOK They have blown up a bus" and not "Oh gee that was retaliation for 1882"

Scottish as well I can imagine the barbarians in the pub going on about how Egypt had this and had that and we want it.

I bet not much has changed to this day other than the clothes they wear and the beer they drank.

Oh Shut it McGregor, I gave you my address I haven't heard frm yooo

"Yeah send the Irish we can afford to lose some of them. They wouldnt know better anyway." (Tell them I have beer I might get raided I bet that's what happened in Bankstown then you had a laugh at them.)

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-vbd9X8PMu-s/TlNXDtz3zEI/AAAAAAAABc0/ajiY8_6V3rI/s1600/rgeerg.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.106.199.156 (talk) 15:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Tell El Kebir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930201008/http://onwar.com/aced/chrono/c1800s/yr80/fegypt1882b.htm to http://onwar.com/aced/chrono/c1800s/yr80/fegypt1882b.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

Shouldn't it be 'Tel-el-kebir'? Not 'Tell.' Regardless, be consistent ie it mixes spellings.

Robinvp11 (talk) 08:16, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]