The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
A fact from Operation Bringing Home the Goods appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 March 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
I believe this Keshev report is being given undue weight with an entire section. It's just an NGO, with an opinion just like any other. Perhaps it could be mentioned as part of the Israeli reaction. -- Nudve (talk) 06:24, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
With both the Palestinian Authority and Israel considering Saadat a criminal, should he be called a POW? Also, the graphic implies Saadat was a PNA commander. Saadat was (is?) the head of the PFLP. Is this meant to imply that he was commanding his own jailers? It just looks inaccurate and sloppy. 208.115.148.244 (talk) 05:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It says in the lead section that the attack was part of the Second Intifada. This seems to be OR. I have not found a source that says this, especially an academic one. While there was no official end to the Second Intifada, it is generally thought to have ended around 2005, after having been limited by Operation Defensive Shield and the construction of the fence. —Ynhockey(Talk)17:22, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
