Talk:Battle of Faesulae (406)

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Wrong Date

I'm quite certain this battle was fought in 406, not 405. Radagasus' invasion commenced in 405, but the final battle was several months later and he was executed in August 406. Once I find some references I shall fix this. --Jmullaly (talk) 03:58, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are right. E A Thompson in "The Huns" pages 37-38 says that the battle took place in early 406. It was a mixed group of Huns and Alans, followers of Uldin, but not necessarily led by him. comment added by AlanPom (talk • 20:10, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moved. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 06:19, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reliability of Robert Franklin Pennell as Source?

There is quite an long and entertaining section added by user @Refoelp on 17:22, 24 May 2018, which cites Pennell and alleges how 100,000 defeated barbarian escaped into Gaul, ended up in Aquitania, and effectively separated Gaul from the empire forevermore. The section references Pennell's book, "Ancient Rome From the Earliest Times Down To 476 AD" https://gutenberg.org/cache/epub/6989/pg6989-images.html#link2H_4_0058 . That book is written as a university history text. It does not cite any sources. Pennell attributes (or confuses) these alleged survivors with the barbarians who crossed the Rhine in 406CE.

Pennell obviously read Gibbon since his story seems to come straight from Gibbon. (So why quote Pennell?) Gibbon also alleges that 100,000 warriors survived the battle and that Stilicho opposed their march (to where?) and facilitated their retreat (to where?). Gibbon says the invasion of Gaul (of 406 CE? He is unclear.) was "was executed by the remains of the great army of Radagaisus." There is no suggestion that this happened immediately after the battle of Faesulae.

Regardless, Pennell should not be cited. RMcPhillip (talk) 21:25, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neither Gibbon or Pennell should be used in this encyclopedia. Both are outdated.--Kansas Bear (talk) 21:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The entire "Aftermath" section is based on unreliable sources (Gibbons and Pennell, who quotes Gibbons!), so I will delete it. Better no history than historical fiction. Perhaps someone can cite a reliable source that shows the survivors of Radagaisus's army participated in the 406 CE invasion of Gaul. If so, we can have a credible "Aftermath" section. RMcPhillip (talk) 18:38, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]