Talk:Battle of Chawinda

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Chawinda article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3: 12 months

India: History High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Pakistan Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani history.

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

RFC on the Result - Pakistani Victory/Indian defeat

RfC started by a ban evading sock, closing it per WP:DENY. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 20:33, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

~~As already mentioned, an RFC concluded that it was a Pakistani Victory. The decision was further reviewed and consensus was once again in favor of the RFC - Pakistani Victory.~~

~~The participants of this short talk page discussion concluded the battle was inconclusive.~~

~~Should the result of the Battle of Chawinda be "Pakistani Victory" or "Indian defeat"? Joooshhh (talk) 19:29, 1 September 2022 (UTC)~~ [reply]

Pakistani Victory It's cut and dry - as the reliable sources state - the Indians failed to attack, the Pakistanis successful defended themselves. Joooshhh (talk) 19:58, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Close RfC This seems ridiculous to make an RfC after a block evading IP created one a few weeks prior and now an account with 17 edits on a page that is ECP? This does not seem like the correct protocol. – The Grid (talk) 22:12, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 December 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add the following sections

==Other 1971 battles in the vicinity==

== See also ==

Thank you. 119.74.238.54 (talk) 03:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Spintendo 04:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 June 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add the following item in the "See also" section:

Other battles in the vicinity during 1965 India-Pakistan War 220.255.242.109 (talk) 09:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Partly done, put it in the further reading section instead. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 02:26, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kingsmasher678, the navbox and sidebar already have these battles. Consequently, the addition of these to either further reading or see also is redundant. The added links are also mentioned in the article text. Cinderella157 (talk) 03:27, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, good catch. I'm trying to work through the old edit requests, and this one had been on the books a good while. I'll self revert.

Kingsmasher678 (talk) 03:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]