Talk:Battle for Haditha
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle for Haditha article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
civilians?
[edit]The article currently says: "At least 15 of those killed were noncombatant civilians. " Is there any doubt that all of the civilians turned out to have been noncombatants? No weapons were found, after all. Geo Swan (talk) 17:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- That was and unsourced and outdated info that obviously came from the initial revealed facts about the incident. According to the wikipedia's article Haditha_killings we now know the victims were 24 unarmed civilians. Sperxios (talk) 10:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Historical accuracy
[edit]We should add a section regarding historical accuracy. At present, there is no mention of this film's fidelity to the events portrayed. Rklawton (talk) 20:12, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed. This film was made based on the early assumptions about the accidental, but lawful, killings in the Haditha incident. Assumptions from the rush to judgement that occurred in the media frenzy about the incident. Assumptions that have become discredited, or at least controversial, since the Marines in the incident told their side of the story. Most films based on historical events take some minor liberties, but this one is completely skewed by its assumption that the Marines killed Iraqi civilians in cold blood instead of mistaking them for insurgents. Walterego (talk) 22:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Battle for Haditha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080705061357/http://www.bfi.org.uk/whatson/lff/files/pdf/lff_2007_web_calendar.pdf to http://www.bfi.org.uk/whatson/lff/files/pdf/lff_2007_web_calendar.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:15, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle for Haditha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071215233639/http://www.nickbroomfield.com:80/haditha.html to http://www.nickbroomfield.com/haditha.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Film influences - Pontecorvo's 1966 "Battle for Algiers"
[edit]I was a little surprised to see no mention of the 1966 film that both has a similar title and uses a very similar story telling device of showing a conflict with civilian casualties from two sides. I guess I saw the Pontecorvo influences immediately when watching the movies, but as to not make it original research, quite a few other critics saw those connections as well - these are all articles about the movie that also brings Battle for Algiers up: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2007-may-13-ca-iraqfilms13-story.html https://www.tvguide.com/movies/battle-for-haditha/review/2030128315/ https://www.standard.co.uk/culture/film/oh-what-a-horrible-war-7403383.html
I don't know how it would be incorporated into the article, but I do think the current article has a very underdeveloped Critical Reception section.
Addendum: Found an interview in which Nick Broomfield explicitly mentions Battle for Algiers as a major influence, https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/nick-broomfield-how-the-filmmaker-recreated-one-of-the-most-notorious-incidents-in-the-iraq-war-771014.html
Broomfield based the film on his own intensive research and a 6,000-page document on the incident issued by the US Naval Criminal Investigation Service. "What we portray is a very mild version of what happened and I stand by it completely," he says. "The greatest influence in making the film was The Battle Of Algiers; I wanted to emulate that multifaceted view of conflict."
Gillo Pontecorvo's classic Battle Of Algiers (1966) re-enacted the Algerian uprising against the occupying French with non-actors in real locations. Similarly, Broomfield's cast are all non-actors – the Marines played by young veterans of the war and the civilians by Iraqi refugees from Jordan (where the film was shot), many of whom had family members killed in the conflict. "The Iraqis all had a gruesome story to tell," says Broomfield, "but they don't hate America; in fact, most of them aspire to life in America. It's George Bush they hate with a passion. But they're more concerned with surviving than anything else."[1] Fisk0 (talk) 20:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Nick Broomfield: How the film-maker recreated one of the most notorious incidents in the Iraq war". The Independent. Retrieved 6 January 2023.