Talk:BDCyclists

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

No consensus, 26 June 2022, see discussion.
keep, 15 October 2013 (UTC), see discussion.

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Cycling

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 6 October 2013 by reviewer Pratyya Ghosh (talk · contribs).

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because the topic passes WP:N. Also, the article is currently at AfD, and an !voter there has suggested that the article be kept. --Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:00, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ridwanq (talk • contribs) 08:41, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guardian Blog Post

Mr. Rahat, I have just confirmed with wikipedia editors that blogs can be used if it is a 'world media, subject matter expert, dedicated blog about the topic area'. Therefore, please stop deleting the Guardian reference. The reference is specifically taken from the 'Bike Blog' of a reputed international media, the Guardian. Ridwanq (talk) 14:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I never told that newsblogs can't be used as reference. But you can't you use this ref to support materials like News of this org has been published in international media. Blogs are not news. - Rahat | Message 17:05, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to wikipolicy These (newsblogs) may be acceptable sources if the writers are professionals, but use them with caution because the blog may not be subject to the news organization's normal fact-checking process. If a news organization publishes anopinion piece in a blog, attribute the statement to the writer (e.g. "Jane Smith wrote..."). Dear Ridwanq, have you attributed to that blog writer? - Rahat | Message 17:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what the exact point you're trying to make is, but the author is a professional journalist, the bike blog is essentially a column in The Guardian and the article is not an opinion piece either. SmartSE (talk) 18:07, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Smartse for making it clear. Mr. Rahat is acting extremely strangely. I have already mentioned to him that I have talked to editors online and they have mentioned to me that it is completely find to use the Guardian Bike Blog. Ridwanq (talk) 01:45, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Number of group members

Number of members in their facebook group should not be included in the article. It doesn't provide any significance. The process of registration to this organization is just to join their facebook group.source:here Anyone can add anyone to a facebook group without his permission. All 24,000 members of their facebook group are not interested in this organization and also possible that someone has added them to this group although they have no wish to join there. I am removing it. - Rahat | Message 02:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Rahat Bhai....think you missed something there is a registration link the the website www.bdcyclists.com.....ref. http://bdcyclists.com/register/ Anyone can join the rides of BDC they do not need to register for that. Facebook events are created due to the ease of use of the events. But to be member of the group one has to register through the website registration page link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The sorcerer (talk • contribs) 04:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Rahat, you have mentioned, 'All 24,000 members of their facebook group are not interested in this organization and also possible that someone has added them to this group although they have no wish to join there.' Please explain from where you are citing your information from. It is important that you provide valid evidence that shows that all 24,000 members of their facebook group are not interested in this organization. Do you have proof that someone was added to the group even though they were not interested? Ridwanq (talk) 09:37, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Bangladeshi Cyclists. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. One failed because link rot set in before the url was archived.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:06, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to "BDCyclists"

I cross checked several documents, including their website. "BDCyclists" is the only formal name I found. Mrb Rafi (talk) 05:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]