Talk:Baldwin–Reynolds House

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 5 November 2023 by reviewer Pbritti (talk · contribs).

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Baldwin–Reynolds House appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 February 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the design of the Baldwin–Reynolds House, a mansion built for U.S. Supreme Court justice Henry Baldwin, may have been inspired by Andrew Jackson's home?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Baldwin-Reynolds House.

Wikipedia

Hey!

I like the article, but I would personally expand more on your sources and provide more information as well as place the photo in an infobox with more information on the place. Dannycool3000 (talk) 11:12, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 11:58, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the design of the Baldwin–Reynolds House, a mansion built for U.S. Supreme Court justice Henry Baldwin, may have been inspired by Andrew Jackson's home? Source: Donnelly, Lu (July 17, 2018). "Baldwin-Reynolds House". SAH Archipedia. Society of Architectural Historians. Retrieved November 20, 2023.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Brillante Jr. (wrestler, born 2001)

5x expanded by Pbritti (talk). Self-nominated at 16:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Baldwin-Reynolds House; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: new enough, long enough, well-sourced, hook interesting enough and cited. Looks good to me =) Broc (talk) 13:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but nominating an article 16 days after it is moved into mainspace is way too late. Schwede 66 09:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66: The article was not nominated as new to mainspace, but based on my 5x expansion about 2.5 weeks after it became an article. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies; you are absolutely correct. That's a 5-times expansion from 14 to 22 November (and nobody is going to fuss about this being 8 days instead of 7). Good to go. Schwede 66 18:54, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

5x expansion was Nov 20—21, for recording purposes. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:08, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've unpromoted this due to copyright problems. See Special:Diff/1195843545 for details. RoySmith (talk) 15:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I say yank it entirely. I have no time to resolve this myself and that material has been in the article since before and during my expansion. It's a bummer, but it happened. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed, if someone would like to check and repromote. Valereee (talk) 13:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Valereee: Weirdly, reading WP:DYK5X, your helpful and kind removal of the offending information appears to have made it far easier for the article to have cleared the expansion bar. Hadn't even considered that. Thanks for taking the time to improve the article. Your help improved the article while I was dealing with a stressful work week and allowed me to come back to this article with renewed hopes for its chance at running at DYK. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lede suitably paraphrased, and Earwig provides no further cause for concern. Good to go.--Laun chba ller 16:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]