Talk:Bal maiden

Bal maiden has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 23, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
November 15, 2012	Peer review	Reviewed
March 15, 2013	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

Current status: Good article

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cornwall Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

OTRS

Originally marked as a copyright violation of http://www.balmaiden.co.uk/.

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.balmaiden.co.uk/. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under the GNU Free Documentation License. Because this permission was received prior to 1 November 2008, you may use the material under either that license or the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2008020310002894.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

howcheng {chat} 22:25, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Bal_maiden&oldid=312415136

The above OTRS request refers to this version of the article. The article has since been rewritten, and the text imported from the website no longer remains. Mogism (talk) 14:08, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bal maiden/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk · contribs) 20:39, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 20:39, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

On this basis of a very quick read of this article, I anticipate that it should gain GA-status by the end of this review. I'm now going to work my way through the article, but leaving any consideration of the WP:lead until the end.

This stage is looking for "problems, so content of this section is going to be mostly about problems, if any. Pyrotec (talk) 21:04, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Background -

This section looks OK.

Mechanisation and the 18th century copper boom -

....Stopping at this point. To be continued (tomorrow). Pyrotec (talk) 21:30, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This section looks OK.

Industrialisation and the 19th century copper boom -

This section looks OK.

- Total numbers, Typical work -

These two subsections look OK.

- Working conditions -

This subsections looks OK.

Decline -

This section looks OK.

WP:Lead -

This section looks OK.

Pyrotec (talk) 18:28, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

An informative and well-referenced article.

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
Well illustrated.

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

I'm delighted to be able to award this article GA-status. I believe that could be a strong candidate for WP:FAC. Pyrotec (talk) 18:28, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"The last surviving bal maiden died in 1968" ?

It seems unlikely that they had all died less than half a century after Dolcoath mine closed in 1921. Also, this radio interview is dated "1980-85", with a woman who was 100 at the time and worked as a bal maiden before WW1. I know nothing about this subject, however, so won't edit the article but simply leave this here in the hope that someone knowledgeable can assess the interview's relevance or otherwise. Loganberry (Talk) 23:53, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]