Talk:Asturcón

Equine Low‑importance

	Horses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Horse breeds task force.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Hi JLAN, yeah, next time may be easier to just fix it. I'll let you do that part and clean it all up. (Noogies). Montanabw^(talk) 23:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup start

I created the subpage, Talk:Asturcón/Temp pasting in some stuff from a 2006 version of the article, which is probably also the Okie State material. Go for the fix! You'll need an admin to move it back into the mainspace, but they do it quickly once you ask. Montanabw^(talk) 00:06, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your help here. :) I'm afraid, though, that we can't use content from earlier versions of articles without attribution. In this case, it was easy enough to fix, though, since the content had been merged from another article. I just recreated the merge. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:02, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know that it was inadequate, but we had to start with something, and I wasn't the one with the time to do it, so I basically set things up so someone else who had the time would at least have a general idea of what to do. Thanks for going in and at least getting rid of the big black box! Montanabw^(talk) 19:31, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.ansi.okstate.edu/breeds/horses/asturian/. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:02, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here's what was written here before it was removed by another user:
"Thanks for fixing this. Next time I'll just delete the copyright material, save you this trouble. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:47, 1 April 2011 (UTC)"[reply]
Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:35, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We know that, but we have several thousand articles at WPEQ to eyeball and this wasn't on the priority list to fix, so THANK YOU so much for diving in and doing the cleanup for us! Montanabw^(talk) 19:31, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it was a blatant copy and had been sitting here for 3 or 4 years without anyone doing anything about it, but what the hell.

I'll thank you to make a point of NEVER FOR ANY REASON removing a contribution of mine from a discussion page again. Apart from being extremely discourteous, it is also, I believe, against the published policies of this wiki, with which you are no doubt far more familiar than I, but which can in any case be seen at WP:TPO.
Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:35, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

JLAN, I have no freaking idea what you are even talking about, I never deliberately delete other people's stuff except the vandal stuff we all deal with. If something you said was deleted by me, it was entirely inadvertent, maybe an edit conflict. You need to seriously read WP:AGF because I've about had it with your attitude and just had to reread it myself. I DO believe that you do have good faith in wanting to improve these articles, but you are being mean, rude, sarcastic, and nasty. You also are doing way more criticism than actual good faith work or collaboration (that said, you ARE doing some work, which is why I'm still willing to work with you at all) Time to kill the snark. Montanabw^(talk) 07:46, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]