Talk:AskMen

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Self Promotion

seems like self-promotion to me.--Alhutch 07:50, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I just wanted to find out who set it up and its background. None of that here. It is apparently a Canadian company, though. El Gringo 06:34, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It might be self promotion (however is there any evidence of that?), but it still is a major site worthy of an article. Mathmo 02:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I remember an AskMen.com team-member named "David" who has been suspended from Wikipedia because he added loads of AskMen-links, even than if there was nothing relevant. You are welcome to ask for deletion, if you feel this article is a self-promotion. A moderator or adminsitrator will review and decide then. deletion-template is db|... Adminix 12:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree here. Will put up a flag.ReginaldTQ (talk) 20:18, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Still needs a lot of work. Sorry just getting back into editing, will try to help more soon.ReginaldTQ (talk) 03:24, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know I am late on this, but working now! ReginaldTQ (talk) 00:06, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

tag

I'll remove the tag, has been up for ages and ages and ages. And there as been no mention here in the talk page at all as to why it was added or what specificly the author thought is needed. Mathmo 01:51, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AskMen Screencapture.JPG

Image:AskMen Screencapture.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:37, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Account AskMenOfficial

AskeMenOfficial is an employee of the company with whom I have been in touch with by email. I've advised the user to post talk page comments here if the article needs clarity rather than just editing the article directly. Please play nice, happy editing to you all. Keegan (talk) 06:13, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alexa rank

Hi,

Am I reading the little box information correctly? The Alexa rank has gone up? Should we update this? I have to admit I am a big fan of this site, although it's gone downhill recently (too many ads). ReginaldTQ (talk) 23:51, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Random Anonymous Grammar Doofus Finds Error

"AskMen.com was able in the men's lifestyle space."

Was able what??? Someone forgot some words — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.47.241.222 (talk) 23:39, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AskMen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100316201857/http://ca.askmen.com/mediakit/yahoo_nielsen_ratings.html to http://ca.askmen.com/mediakit/yahoo_nielsen_ratings.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:09, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]