Talk:Army of the Rhine (1791–1795)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Army of the Rhine (1791–1795) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: European / French / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wikidata hmmm

Well I tried to sort out some links and fell foul of Wikidata. i.e there are a whole heap of Armies of the Rhine, and the French have not been reticent aboutr adding to their number. How do people think we should handle this.

What I would suggest is this:

Keep page with current titleLeutha
Develop pages such Armée du Rhin (1791) as and when people develop content.

What do people think? Leutha (talk) 13:25, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirming the Smith reference

Gday @Auntieruth55: I notice this article uses a number of short citations to Smith (e.g. ^ Smith, pp. 21–22.), but unfortunately doesn't seem to give the corresponding long citation (per WP:CITESHORT). As such its not really possible to know where this material came from. That said from looking at one of your other recent articles - Army of the Rhine and Moselle - I'm assuming it is from Digby Smith, Napoleonic Wars Data Book, Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books, 1996. Is that correct? If so could it pls be clarified in the reference list? I'd have gone ahead and added it myself but I wanted to check first. All the best. Anotherclown (talk) 00:00, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, fixed. Thank you. Ruth auntieruth (talk) 20:49, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers Ruth, all sorted. Looks good. Anotherclown (talk) 02:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]