This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal
As Wikipedia has decided to let several minor musical acts like Preston Reed or End of You in it encyclopaedic embrace, I cannot see why Anubis Gate would not fill the criteria. They're internationally respected - although I do admit that probably not by such a wide audience as the Spice Girls or the likes - but I am very interested to know, how and where are you going to draw the line? Pop acts in Wiki only, mainstream for the masses? Or is the number of albums sold by the artist going to be the meter for measuring their value for Wikipedia?
I personally wouldn't buy a dictionary that includes only the most common words used in language. The same goes with Wiki, for sure. I'm always delighted to find some unusual information in it and I bet that I'm not the only one. At the moment the site is a valuable source of information because of its wide range of subjects. If you start being picky with your articles, you will at some stage become elitisthic and distance yourselves from the common people that the website was originally brought to life for. Whineypaws (talk) 00:18, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok fine, I did read WP notability stuff and I can see that you marked Anubis Gate for deletion by error. If you had checked my sources - the band has released three albums with Locomotive Records, the last one was out in 2007. That should qualify them for Wiki by your own standards. Now, to be honest, I don't really care what you do with my article - they're just a Danish band I haven't even seen live - but I just could not resist a little provocation that you so kindly offered by placing the speedy del tag on the article. Have a notable day! :) Whineypaws (talk) 00:38, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
