Jump to content

Talk:American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Duplicate article

[edit]

Hi. I'm about to merge American Elec. Power Co. v. Connecticut to this article (last revision before merge). This article seems more developed and was started first. If there's any salvageable content from the redirected article, please feel free to merge it in. Thanks! --MZMcBride (talk) 20:43, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Review experts Justice Ruth B. Ginsburg http://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx Attorney Barbara D. Underwood: Barbara.Underwood@ag.ny.gov

StacyPF (talk) 21:11, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review Comments

[edit]

Hi there. The article reads clearly and is succinct. I primarily have editorial comments, which I think will greatly improve the readability.

- The term "GHGs" should not contain an apostrophe ("'") - I noticed that sometimes the terms "plaintiff" and "defendant" is capitalized. Be consistent. I don't think the terms should be capitalized. - Check spelling of "habitat." It's spelled as "habit" in the article. - Check spelling of "non-justiciable" - In-text citations should appear after the period. - Check capitalization of the term "state." I think it should only be capitalized when used as a portion of an official agency name or in government documents when used to report on an official name. If it's used generally, it should be lower case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adawg03 (talk • contribs) 04:38, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hello,

I think this is a great article; and would expand upon your work by adding dates to the history, as well as increase your # of references.

Cjpepino (talk) 22:22, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Some additional comments: I suggest expanding the Supreme Court ruling section of your article. Describe how the U.S. Supreme Court arrived at its decision. Also, the term "court" is mentioned loosely in this section when referring to the Mass. v. EPA case. You might want to consider specifying which court you're referring to.

- How does the Baker v. Carr case relate to your article? Maybe I mis-read but suggest that you tie the significance of that case to yours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adawg03 (talk • contribs) 04:49, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Interesting article! I see you fixed some of the above good edits, but wanted to add a few more:

- Recommend italicizing case names throughout (helps to make it more reader friendly)

- Should defendants be plural. Saw use of defendants' throughout.

- Given the multiple parties, would be helpful to link to Wikipedia pages whenever possible. Helps to keep your article brief while allowing the reader quick access to content elsewhere.

- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtreetree (talk • contribs) 05:17, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you everyone for the comments.

-Bryan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bahodges (talk • contribs) 15:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Significance

[edit]

The ruling in AEP impacted a number of cases based on common law claims that were in the lower courts. The most significant being Kivalina v. Exxon Mobil and Comer v. Murphy Oil. Take a look. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aarf613 (talk • contribs) 18:30, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Ninth Circuit dismisses public nuisance lawsuit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aarf613 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all the great suggestions! StacyPF (talk) 19:42, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

General comments by Stuartyeates

[edit]

Please see general comments by User:Stuartyeates on articles generated by this class at Education Program talk:University of San Francisco/Environmental Law (Spring 2013)#Feedback_on_the_articles. Please respond there if you have any questions or comments. Dcoetzee 01:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of San Francisco supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2013 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:34, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:American_Electric_Power_Co._v._Connecticut&oldid=1204800143"