Talk:Capgemini Engineering

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France: Paris Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Paris task force.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

VfD discussion

from VfD:

Spam, no useful content. I almost speedy deleted it -- Chuq 07:52, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Comment: Chuq, you did tag it for speedy. :-) Since you decided to list it here instead, I changed the speedy tag to a Vfd tag. SWAdair | Talk 08:00, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I realised that and came back later, I think I got to it 20 seconds after you changed it :) Chuq 22:33, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Keep. Google gives 10,700 hits in English, 78,100 in all languages. With that many people talking about it, it looks notable enough to me. SWAdair | Talk 08:14, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep but improve the article. It should be listed in cleanup/stubs needing attention pages, not here. Multinational enterprise with revenue around 1.3B USD and nearly 18000 employees in four continents is certainly a valid topic. jni 08:20, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete if it stays a substub by the end of voting. Look, the topic might be worthwhile, but we do ourselves a vast disservice, and our readers an insult, by carrying placeholders like this. We lose users every time we yield something like this to a search. Wikipedia isn't just about retaining contributors: we are supposed to be making a reference work. Geogre 00:51, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete if it stays a substub by the end of voting. Ambi 03:33, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Altran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208174349/http://bourse.latribune.fr/actions/nyse-euronext-paris/altran-technologies/societe-activites-perspectives-194466.html to http://bourse.latribune.fr/actions/nyse-euronext-paris/altran-technologies/societe-activites-perspectives-194466.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please add the acquisition of Aricent

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes may be promotional in tone.

P.S. I talked to User:AntiCompositeNumber on IRC about this change. User:AntiCompositeNumber seems to approve of the change.

Please add the following right after 'Dominique Cerutti' in the introduction.

On November 30, 2017, Altran signed an agreement to acquire the global design and engineering services firm Aricent. The deal is expected to close in the first quarter of 2018. The combined entity will have 44,000 employees operating across 30 countries and have close to €3 billion ($3.56 billion) in revenues.^[1]

References

^ Altran acquires Aricent, India Times, Retrieved 2017-12-19

Declined The requested claim statements represent forward-thinking hypotheses regarding future expectations and do not represent matters for an encylopedia, per: WP:FUTURE. If AntiCompositeNumber is willing to make this change to an article which is — by all appearances — already bloated, they are welcome to it.
Regards,
Spintendo ᔦᔭ 03:39, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the wording I used was that the request didn’t obviously violate any policies or guidelines when they asked in WP:IRCHELP. I won’t be adding the sentence nor doing the complete rewrite this article probably needs (WP:OTHERPARENT anyone?), so this article will probably stay as it is. --AntiCompositeNumber (Ring me) 16:31, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amazingly, I wasn't notified about this through email! Anyhow, thanks @AntiCompositeNumber: and @Spintendo: for looking into this proposed addition. I had a look at WP:FUTURE. The agreement was signed, no crystal balls are needed. The acquisition does not announce a product not is it a rumor. Anything I could do to enhance the text? Angyjoe1 (talk) 08:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[Altran_acquires_Aricent-1] Altran acquires Aricent, India Times, Retrieved 2017-12-19

[1]