This redirect was nominated for deletion on 3 May 2011. The result of the discussion was keep.
Warning: active arbitration remedies
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. Ifconsensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
This is a separate article from that one. This is about the system of apartheid itself, not the analogy. As I stated (while I edited as an IP and forgot to log in), I started this article modeled after the Uyghur genocide article, which has that title and not "China and the genocide analogy" (despite the charge of genocide being contentious). Apartheid is the WP:COMMONNAME of the human rights violations done by Israel, as reflected in the sources of this article (Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, B'Tselem). That article can focus on historical comparisons of Israel to South African apartheid, but this one is going to primarily focus on how the system of apartheid operates in Israel in the West Bank. I have worked on this article for hours and would appreciate it if you'd first discuss in this talk page before wiping all of my work. Thanks.--JasonMacker (talk) 19:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are free to make that argument there, but you may not edit material related to the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area in the mainspace until you have 500 edits. You can copy your work to a sandbox in your userspace. But making the edit in article space violates WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 19:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
