Talk:Borealpox virus
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Alaskapox virus)
A fact from Borealpox virus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 July 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Schwede66 (talk) 09:51, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
( )
... that we are still not exactly sure how Alaskapox virus, a recently discovered relative of Monkeypox virus, has spread to humans from animals?... that public health authorities are still not exactly sure how Alaskapox virus, a recently discovered relative of Monkeypox virus, has spread to humans from animals? Source: Alaska Department of Health & Human Services Factsheet, also cited in article: "We believe that Alaskapox virus primarily occurs in small mammals. We are not sure how exactly the virus spreads from animals to people."- Reviewed:
Created by WhinyTheYounger (talk). Self-nominated at 01:22, 4 July 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: I've checked the usage of the two most cited sources and have not flagged any concerns about original research or plagiarism. Mr rnddude (talk) 03:09, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Who's 'we'? It's certainly not us. Change '... we are still not exactly sure ...' to '... it remains unclear ...' or similar phrasing without usage of personal pronouns.- Concern addressed. Mr rnddude (talk) 03:01, 6 July 2022 (UTC)- Would it be possible to replace "we" with "public health authorities" (or just "scientists")? If not, the passive construction is fine. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs)
- Yes, that works fine as well. Mr rnddude (talk) 03:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. Struck through old wording. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 19:00, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, that works fine as well. Mr rnddude (talk) 03:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- - Minor issue resolved. Mr rnddude (talk) 03:01, 6 July 2022 (UTC)