Talk:Al-Muʼminun

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Al-Muʼminun article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Islam Mid‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religious texts (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts

It is requested that one or more audio files be included in this article to improve its quality.
Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request.

Need to edit English spelling

According to the Arabic way of spelling the name (viz. Arabic: سورة المؤمنون ) the surah needs to be spelt 'Al-Mu’minoon' in English. I have made edits wherever necessary for this and am now proceeding to move the surah to it's correct title now. In case anyone thinks otherwise, please discuss here before reverting. 'Abd el 'Azeez (talk) 11:59, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Which way to edit English spelling

There are many theories about how to transcribe Arabic into English. I don't like the one currently being used. In particular I object to the "oo". I would spell the phrase al-muminun. I leave out hamza. My way is just my way. I think it would be best if Wikipedia were to adapt a standard transliteration. But I am not sanguine about reaching agreement as to which transliteration. DKleinecke (talk) 17:55, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The contents of this article

I believe this article should be removed from the Wikipedia. Or, perhaps, to a perfunctory description of it as the 23rd surah and a cross-reference to the Qur'an. As it stands it is an extensive tafsir and is full of POV. If a description is needed there is a good one paragraph description in Maulana Muhammad Ali's translation. In fact if I were doing this I would use MMA's descriptions for all 114 surahs. And I feel sure that many Muslims would object because he belonged to the Ahmadiyya. All of these theological matters are fraught with sectarian disagreements and sure to induce controversy if extended beyond the basic obvious points. DKleinecke (talk) 17:55, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]