Talk:Aktiengesellschaft

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany High‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Redirect from Aktiengesetz

That's the law covering companies traded by shares. It should have its own page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.64.182.52 (talk) 11:28, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg

Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stakeholder powers

Shouldn’t the information about the German supervisory board be merged with the article on Aktiengesellschaft? The article about Aktiengesellschaft implies that it is exactly the same corporate entity as a Public Limited Company, PLC in the UK or US. It rather simplistically translates Aktiengesellschaft as a company owned by share holders whose policies are decided on purely by shareholders. But, in actual fact, because of the supervisory board Aktiengesellshchaft are actually owned, well company policy is decided at any rate, by stakeholders rather than just shareholders through their voting powers at the Annual General Meeting or EGM. So, the article is being quite misleading without this key piece of information.

Shareholders have a voting majority in the Aufsichtsrat. Both sides have the same member amount. But the president of the Aufsichtsrat has a double valued vote, when there is no majority in the first vote round. Liproqq (talk) 17:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Compare AG between Switzerland and Germany

Your article confuses a little bit about the legal situation from companies under 'AG' - law: The AG in switerzland is very very close to the GmbH in Germany, where as the 'GmbH' in switzerland is comparable (if not to say similar) to germans 'AG'. This is an important detail to know for. 178.199.53.143 (talk) 13:10, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

supervisory board

In swiss 'AG's, the supervisory board is not called Aufsichtsrat but Verwaltungsrat. There must be named at least 3 at founding moment for a 'AG' - company. the president is called 'Verwaltungsratspräsident'.178.199.53.143 (talk) 13:15, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"limited"

This article refers to

"a corporation limited by share ownership".

When the word "limited" is used in this context, I usually understand it to refer to limitations on the liability of share owners. It that is what is meant, that ought to be stated here, and if it is not, then the article is unclear. Besides AG, there is also GmbH, meaning Geselschaft mit beschränkter Haftung, i.e. "company with limited liability. If AG differs in meaning from GmbH, then what is the nature of the "limitations", if any, implied by "AG"? Michael Hardy (talk) 14:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GmbH can be private limited company. Aktiengesellschaft = Share holders. Telecine Guy (talk) 20:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page for Brazil

Brazil's Sociedade Anônima has been explained on same page for Portugal. Suggest to separate or direct to same page. Henriquebrisola (talk) 18:38, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It has been suggested that this article be merged into Joint-stock company

It has been suggested that this article be merged into Joint-stock company. Discuss is on Joint-stock company page. Has three no votes as of April 2022, started in February 2021.! This is no. Telecine Guy (talk) 19:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: the article is already in summary style, and that structure seems to work well. Klbrain (talk) 09:26, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: We have articles for other country-specific public company variants (Public limited company, Société Anonyme, OJSC), and Aktiengesellschaft seems deserving of an article as well. Stonkaments (talk) 21:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: This is about German Joint-stock company, not US Joint-stock companies. Telecine Guy (talk) 19:47, 5 April 2022 (UT