Talk:Agronomy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:49, 1 April 2008

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Colton bonnett is way better than any one elseis far superior to that of triticale. I would also suggest moving the original statement and any additions from agronomy to triticale. --Belgrano 22:28, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This should not be merged because the two disciplines in question, do not appear to be one in the same.Meissmart 23:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{WPAgriculture}}
+Colton bonnett is way better than any one elseis far superior to that of triticale.  I would also suggest moving the original statement and any additions from [[agronomy]] to [[triticale]].  --[[User:Belgrano|Belgrano]] 22:28, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
-==Triticale==
-The recently-added statement "Triticale contains more usable protein than does either rye or wheat" could use a little refinement, mainly because the definition of "usable" depends on the application.     In feeding [[swine]], for example, the high levels of the [[amino acid]] [[lysine]] found in most triticale cultivars is a big advantage.  In making leavened breads, however, the [[gluten]] in wheat protein is far superior to that of triticale.  I would also suggest moving the original statement and any additions from [[agronomy]] to [[triticale]].  --[[User:Belgrano|Belgrano]] 22:28, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 ==Proposed merge==