Talk:Adam Green (musician)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

discography

There is an album (Gemstones) missing from the discography for this artist, which currenty runs "garfield; friends of mine; jacket full of danger". I don't know how to edit to add images etc so have not edited the page, but could somebody please clear this up? The article, looking at it now, actually reads as if the album Gemstones (which falls historically between Friends Of Mine and Jacket Full Of Danger) has been intentionally omitted, though I can't think of a reason for this to be the case. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.211.102.231 (talk) 13:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AdamGreenGemstones.jpg

Image:AdamGreenGemstones.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Satanism

Which idiot read Adam Green's website and took it seriously, thinking he is actually a Satanist? This would be funny, if it were not so sad.

I don't know how to edit Wikipedia (it took me long enough to discover the talk section) so if somebody wants to change this, it would be great.

-->nevermind, I figured it out. the big EDIT THIS PAGE tab did the trick...

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Adam Green (musician)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I rated this article as Start-Class because it already contains basic information and pictures, but still needs to be built. -- dreadlady 15:34, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 15:34, 16 August 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 06:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Adam Green (musician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:01, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]