Talk:2024 United States elections/Archive 1

Archive 1

upcoming changes to the article

I shall be adding a new section to this article.

it will show odds and betting market chances of victory, which are inarguably useful now in addition to polls Godofwarfan69420 (talk) 05:53, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Congressional Map of Louisana

SCOTUS recently struck down Louisanas Congressional map. I am a relatievly new editor, so I'd apprichiate if someone else could update the map. IchAiBims (talk) 16:05, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

I don't believe a new map has been developed or adopted yet. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 16:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Inclusion of State Legislature Elections in Text Box

I see no reason as to why they are not included. If governorships are included, the control of the state legislature should be as well in my opinion. We should add them here and on all other US election pages TRJ2008 (talk) 17:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Mayoral seats that changed parties

An IP editor added a section under 2024 mayoral races for seats that changed parties based upon the existence of a similar section in the 2023 U.S. elections article. Of the four races listed, three of them are officially non-partisan contests. The victor may be affiliated with a different political party than the previous office holder, but the race wasn't a partisan contest. To me it seems this should be handled more like was done in the 2018 and 2019 articles, noting changes when the race was partisan and then more broadly note trends about the affiliation of election winners. Thoughts? —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

BREAKING!!! Biden has announce he won't seek re-election

How will this article be updated? Namealreadytak (talk) 18:05, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Noticed vandalism here

I created an account for this, idk how things work but obviously someone vandalised the article, can we revert it to a previous state or smth? Therealcrumbles (talk) 04:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

News papers or news TV endorsement?

Is something here on Wikipedia getting this for information? 73.189.88.136 (talk) 22:26, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

They are being tracked in this article: News media endorsements in the 2024 United States presidential election. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 17:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Upcoming/current changes

Suggest changes here and someone could do them and update us all on the election Justhereforresearch (talk) 17:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Trump won

Edit the article 197.91.18.157 (talk) 07:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

AP hasn't called it (and I don't think it's gonna be long until they do). When they do, it will be changed. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 08:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

IT'S CALLED! AP HAS CALLED IT!

TRUMP HAS WON! AP HAS CALLED! Cormio (talk) 10:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Photo caption in 'Indictments' section

The caption for this must be updated to insert 'Alleged' before '[c]lassified' as the case brought was dismissed [1]https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.672.0_2.pdf (So ordered on the final page, page 93). Complicating the matter is that the documents themselves were mishandled as per prosecutions' admission [2]https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.522.0.pdf (See B-4 on page 8, footnote 3)

Updated caption proposed:

Alleged classified intelligence material found inside Mar-a-Lago

31.187.2.147 (talk) 22:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

No. 197.91.18.157 (talk) 22:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Yes. I have made the change, based on the facts of the evidence in question as of this time. In the pre-trail phases of the case in question, both the Office of the Special Council (Jack Smith) and the FBI admitted to the court that the materials had been mishandled and tampered with.

While the factual extent of the tampering would have had an opportunity to be established later in the case at another phase, the Judge dismissed the case prior to those facts being established, leaving us to await the possible appeal of that dismissal and the continuation or "reset" of the case.

Until such time as the materials can be established to be what the OSC and FBI allege them to be, it is objectively correct to identify the material as part of an allegation. TheRazgriz (talk) 18:13, 13 November 2024 (UTC)