Talk:2011–12 UEFA Europa League qualifying phase

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Europe

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Attendance figures

Since the UEFA site, which is official source for this page does not have the attendance figures, the attendance figures given on this page are unsourced and will be deleted. Is there any reason why they should stay on the page without a valid reference? Brudder Andrusha (talk) 15:13, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, we must provide a source for any information that could be contested. Since attendance figures are often vague, we must provide a source for them. If we can't do that, they must be removed. – Pee Jay 16:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The parameter "unsourced_attendence" can be globally modified if a reference can be provided. One reference to the source of where the attendance is found is adequate. Brudder Andrusha (talk) 21:15, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Split article

four of the sections (and perhaps the list of teams) should be split off, as this article is well over 100 kB.--Jax 0677 (talk) 22:55, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While I can see the reason for suggesting a split, the article could be slimmed down without reducing its utility. For example, in the first round, there are a list of matches with scores. Below, the matches are repeated with summary details and a link to the UEFA web site. Maybe, there only needs to be a matches section and the scores link directly to the UEFA website. If am not violently opposed to splitting (as long as some one else does it). However, recent bitter experience suggests that the split articles may get deleted once created. Op47 (talk) 19:53, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2011–12 UEFA Europa League qualifying phase and play-off round. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120312175418/http://www.uefa.com/uefa/management/newsid%3D1651736.html to http://www.uefa.com/uefa/management/newsid%3D1651736.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]