Jump to content

Talk:2010 G20 Toronto summit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2010 G20 Toronto summit has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 20, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
April 4, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article



Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 G20 Toronto summit/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: – Plarem (User | talk | contribs) 20:43, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    – Plarem (User | talk | contribs) 20:43, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]

I concur with Eelamstylez77's edit here. --Tenmei (talk) 00:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Justice (talk) 08:11, 31 December 2014 (UTC) Review by Gary Justice not fulfilling the criteria of : scope : main aspects covered.[reply]

This article is missing reasonable coverage of the controversy of human rights violations fully expressed by mainstream government officials and mainstream press. This has bearing on Canada's overall aggressive and progressive affront to fundamentals of democracy and its changing position internationally as a nation of peace and positive influence. Secondly, the coverage in this article of the economic and social impact of choices made to spend this exorbitant funding of security in a very peaceful territory seems biased in that it details government officials' statements defending the cost allocation and very briefly mentions dissenting views which were huge in volume and quality of articulation.

Similarly the article only mentions, in one sentence, that detainees expressed they "weren't well treated", an immense understatement of the well documented abuses, easily found and supported by a simple google search such as "g-20 propaganda". Police hiding their identity, detainees robbed of crucial medications, a quadriplegic who was left on the floor to defecate on himself and a man whose last name was "Nobody" severely beaten for answering the question "what is your name?". Video footage showing that "black bloc" members may have been police officers, in that they all wore regulation police boots ,and many other details, are unbalanced to be left out of this article.

The lack of information to the public about the actual content of the G-20 meetings, and how the subjects of the meeting were dealt with, other than sparse headlines, is another feature of importance that, left unmentioned, render this article lacking in fulfilling the criteria of "good article" broadly covering the scope.

Proposal: someone who has time and skill to add a section called "Controversy" with links to video, articles and support sources would help to balance this article closer towards "neutral" and would bring attention to these very important features of the event.

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:G-20 major economies which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:14, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2010 G20 Toronto summit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2010 G20 Toronto summit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on 2010 G20 Toronto summit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:2010_G20_Toronto_summit&oldid=1196566885"