Talk:Violence against Indians in Australia controversy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Violence against Indians in Australia controversy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 31 days

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

A news item involving Violence against Indians in Australia controversy was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 9 June 2009.

Wikipedia

Australia: Crime Low‑importance

	Australia portal Violence against Indians in Australia controversy is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discrimination Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 (June 2009)

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Violence against Indians in Australia controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Violence against Indians in Australia controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 - (Deletion of this section)

Detailed reasons why this section has been deleted; 1) I’ve followed the ongoing reports of the terrible crime this section refers to, and I’ve checked the most recent reports on the consequent court case. This court case has made clear that the murder was a random attack and was not driven by racism. 2) Evidence tendered to the court showed that the cause of the attack was extreme psychiatric illness, including schizophrenia and psychosis, & the attacker was found unfit to stand trial for this reason. Since the core theme of the article is racially motivated violence (a fact that should be reflected in the title, but is not), this makes the mention of this crime superfluous to this article. 3) In addition, the current text is about 2 years out of date and does not reflect the court’s findings. For these reasons, the section does not deserve to be in this article and should be deleted. I hope you accept my good faith in making this edit. Cheers! 203.39.222.146 (talk) 12:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Visits by publicity hounds

Why are visits by various publicity seekers more important than the chronology and details of the attacks? I think the previous structure was much more logical. Greglocock (talk) 21:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]