Talk:1979 Gillette Cup final

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is within the scope of the Somerset County Cricket Club task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

1979 Gillette Cup final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 4, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 9, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that by winning the 1979 Gillette Cup Final, Somerset County Cricket Club won their first trophy since forming 104 years earlier?

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1979 Gillette Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sarastro1 (talk) 19:52, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"It was the seventeenth final of the Gillette Cup, which had been the first domestic tournament to pit first-class cricket sides against each other in a knock-out competition.": Should specify "English domestic tournament" as there were overseas ones before this. What about "…the first English domestic knock-out competition between first-class sides"?

Changed as suggested.

Why do we need to specify best and worst bowling in Somerset's innings in the lead? Maybe just the best, or better still leave this out.

Removed.

First paragraph of "Route to the final" is a little repetitive: "Northamptonshire… They… They… Northamptonshire".
"Northamptonshire entered the competition in the second round…": Could we say why neither county played in the first round? (What happened to the good old days of losing to minor counties?)

I can't actually find any source stating why they got first round byes. I'll do some digging though.

"Northamptonshire batted first for the first time…" I don't think we need "for the first time" as the reader can work that out.

Removed.

"Willey was then instrumental…" How?

Added in that it was due to his economical bowling.

"and Somerset's Vic Marks reflected his captain, Brian Rose was glad when Northamptonshire won the toss." This reads oddly. I assume this means that Marks remembered Rose was glad to lose the toss, but it is a little garbled. I'd leave it as "Brian Rose was glad when Northants won the toss".

Changed as suggested.

Overlinking in "Build-up" and "Match": E.g: Both counties and Rose already linked; Marks not linked on first mention, but linked in second. There are a few other examples.

Removed some of the overlinking; which also meant I removed the lovely [[Northamptonshire County Cricket Club|Somerset]].

Should it be chanceless rather than chance-less?

Probably: changed.

Spot-checks fine, no problems with sourcing and referencing. Everything else checks out.
I cleaned up a couple of prose things: Mainly noun verbing.
There may be a few problems with jargon, but I don't see this as an issue for GA.

I'll put it on hold for the moment but shouldn't take long at all. --Sarastro1 (talk) 19:52, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that it took me a while to get to this, I've been pretty busy with RL, Wikipedia is taking something of a back seat at the moment. Harrias ^talk 13:46, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looking good now. Passing. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]