Jump to content

Talk:102nd Intelligence Wing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:102d Fighter Wing)
Good article102nd Intelligence Wing has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 27, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
June 10, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
July 15, 2008Good article nomineeListed
July 23, 2008WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
August 11, 2008WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
November 23, 2008WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
January 8, 2009WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
October 31, 2009WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
May 9, 2010WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
March 8, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 14, 2011WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
December 14, 2016WikiProject A-class reviewDemoted
Current status: Good article

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 102d Intelligence Wing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:16, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 102d Intelligence Wing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:

  • There are uncited statements throughout the article, including almost the entire "History" section.
  • The lead does not summarise all major aspects of the article.

Is anyone interested in addressing the above concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 04:14, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result pending

The article contains numerous uncited statements, including almost the entire "History" section. The lead does not summarise all major aspects of the article. Globalsecurity.com is used numerous times as a reference, but per WP:GLOBALSECURITY it is considered an unreliable source; these inline citations will need to be replaced with reliable sources or the information it is verifying removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:56, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]