Talk:Sunday Night Show: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 86.144.5.228 - "→Multiple Issues: " |
→Mr.Naughty needs to be added a regular caller: new section |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:If it is a flagship show on an important national station (I didn't recognise Absolute as Virgin Radio), then I suspect you're correct about it being notable. However, it still strictly needs [[WP:Reliable sources|Reliable sources]] to ensure [[WP:V]], [[WP:NPOV]], and [[WP:NOR]]. I am also more than tempted to remove the sections on regular callers and jokes; It seems [[WP:NOT|unencyclopedic]] [[WP:fancruft|fancruft]] which is unlikely to have reliable sources. Cheers! [[User:DoubleBlue|<font color="darkblue">'''Double'''</font><font color="blue">Blue</font>]] ([[User talk:DoubleBlue|Talk)]] 21:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC) |
:If it is a flagship show on an important national station (I didn't recognise Absolute as Virgin Radio), then I suspect you're correct about it being notable. However, it still strictly needs [[WP:Reliable sources|Reliable sources]] to ensure [[WP:V]], [[WP:NPOV]], and [[WP:NOR]]. I am also more than tempted to remove the sections on regular callers and jokes; It seems [[WP:NOT|unencyclopedic]] [[WP:fancruft|fancruft]] which is unlikely to have reliable sources. Cheers! [[User:DoubleBlue|<font color="darkblue">'''Double'''</font><font color="blue">Blue</font>]] ([[User talk:DoubleBlue|Talk)]] 21:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Mr.Naughty needs to be added a regular caller == |
|||
Mr.Naughty needs to be added a regular caller |
|||
now. |
|||
Revision as of 23:15, 20 July 2009
- Longest Pradeep ever needs to be added - 15th March 2009. Don't know the length but it was very very long! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.5.228 (talk) 23:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Multiple Issues
OK, seems that the page has been tagged with multiple issues, which mean that the article could be deleted.
I personally believe that the article should remain, as it is a flagship show on a UK national radio station. However, I do believe that some of the criticism is fair, and needs to be addressed.
It does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve it by citing reliable sources.
In fairness, I can't see much there that can be referenced, bar the odd link to Absolute's website, and maybe a link or two to some of Rob and Paulies pranks that have appeared on Youtube.
It resembles a fan site. Tagged since October 2008.
Not yet it doesn't, but it is going that way. If establishing notability for this article will be a problem, then establishing notability for the regular callers will be a nightmare.
The notability of this article's subject is in question. If notability cannot be established, it may be listed for deletion or removed.
The notability of this article should not be in question. It's consistently linked from the front page of Absolute's website, and is comparable with shows with similar formats such as The Geoff Show
It may need copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone or spelling.
Guilty as charged. Doctorbob (talk) 12:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- If it is a flagship show on an important national station (I didn't recognise Absolute as Virgin Radio), then I suspect you're correct about it being notable. However, it still strictly needs Reliable sources to ensure WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:NOR. I am also more than tempted to remove the sections on regular callers and jokes; It seems unencyclopedic fancruft which is unlikely to have reliable sources. Cheers! DoubleBlue (Talk) 21:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Mr.Naughty needs to be added a regular caller
Mr.Naughty needs to be added a regular caller
now.