Talk:Shironamhin: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 11:27, 7 November 2008

Bangladesh Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shironamhin article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{WP Bangladesh}}
 {{talkpage}}
-==Improvement tags==
-Hi Ukhome<br>Can you explain why you are so vigorously against adding any improvement tags to the article? Do you disagree that it ''can'' be improved? I think that, at the moment, the article is not structured as well as it could be (Band history too far down), the lead section doesn't tell the reader why the band is important or notable in the first place, the members-section contains too much [[WP:V|unsourced]] trivia, and the grammar in almost all sections is rather bad ("They made a good style of music", "The album got a good popularity and became a good albums of the year 2004", "They have seen to performed in mainstream open air concerts mostly").<br>Do you disagree that the article can still use work, or do you intend to fix all those problems yourself, or do you have some other reason why you don't want any improvement tags on the article? Please also note that you do not [[WP:OWN]] this article.<br><span style="font-family:Verdana;font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Amalthea|<span style='color:#823824'>Amalthea</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Amalthea|Talk]]</sup></span> 11:16, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
-: Since you didn't answer but instead chose to [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Shironamhin&diff=249162911&oldid=249074228 remove my question] I have restored the issue tag. If you disagree with it I urge you to discuss it here first, per [[WP:Consensus]] and [[WP:BRD]]. --<span style="font-family:Verdana;font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Amalthea|<span style='color:#823824'>Amalthea</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Amalthea|Talk]]</sup></span> 12:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC)