Talk:School of Law, Christ University/Comments: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
RedHillian (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by 122.167.188.248 to last version by RedHillian (HG) |
←Blanked the page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There have been some facts about Christ University, School of Law which needs verification. This article on wikipedia makes Christ University sound like an academically sound place. But my personal verification of facts does not seem to cohere with the facts mentioned on wikipedia. Maybe someone in the management should clarify these bits? |
|||
1.Is it true that four of the founding faculty members have left the institution due to differences in opinion regarding critical policies at Christ College of Law ( now known as slcu). The specific name of the people and the order in thich they left being Olivia Rainford, Johann Chacko, John Thaliath and Dattathreya. Dattathreya himself is an arsehole so it doesn't make sense. Dattathreya left because he was charged with molestation of a very respected officer, Bindu Harikrishnan. He was caught with her in a compromising position in the cabin. |
|||
2. Is it true that Christ College of Law is not transparent about its admission policies. There was a rumour that the reason why they do not make their entrance exam results public is because they do not want to select students on the basis of pure merit. |
|||
3. Is it true that there is a gender bias in the admission procedure. Christ College of Law tries to select more boys than girls on the logic that we are a male dominated society and that girls should sit at home. Even if overall statistics in in India indicate that large no of women sit at home, aint universities the place where this much required social change is to be initiated? |
|||
4. Is it true that the departments where seats do not fill because of lack of demand, the university makes no gender distinction and admits as many women to fill seats? |
|||
5. Is it true that there was an allegation of molestation of a girl by Fr Varghese of the management who is the Chief Financial Officer. On enquiry, the allegation could not be proved for lack of evidence. And the management as an action dismissed the girl who complained from the college. Which part of the world is the person complaning punished if the complaint cannot be proved? Does this suggest any guilt on the part of the management?[[User:Legalexpert|Legalexpert]] ([[User talk:Legalexpert|talk]]) 07:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||