Talk:Paris Hilton: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 07:17, 7 February 2009

Her saggy Vagina loves the cock!

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+Her saggy Vagina loves the cock!
-{{Skiptotoctalk}}
-{{Talkheader}}
-{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
-|target=Talk:Paris Hilton/Archive index
-|mask=Talk:Paris Hilton/Archive <#>
-|leading_zeros=0
-|indexhere=yes}}
-{{autoarchivingnotice|bot=MiszaBot|age=30|small=no|dounreplied=yes}}
-<!-- Metadata: see [[User:MiszaBot I]] -->
-{{User:MiszaBot/config
-|archiveheader = {{Talkarchivenav}}
-|maxarchivesize = 150K
-|minthreadsleft = 10
-|algo = old(30d)
-|archive = Talk:Paris Hilton/Archive %(counter)d
-}}
-{{WikiProjectBannerShell |blp=yes |1=
-{{WikiProject Fashion
-| class= B
-| importance = Low |nested=yes|listas=Hilton, Paris}}
-{{WPBiography|living=yes|class=B|priority=mid|filmbio-work-group=yes |nested=yes|listas=Hilton, Paris}}
-}}
-{{notaforum|your personal opinions about Paris Hilton}}
-== Activism? ==
-Not wearing fur is far from activism. How does this warrant its own section? [[Special:Contributions/75.60.169.46|75.60.169.46]] ([[User talk:75.60.169.46|talk]]) 23:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
-::Her show "Paris Hilton's: My new BFF" showed her eating meat several times.  She ate a shrimp that was grilled to death in front of her at a restaurant in Tokyo, she ate caviar, among others. [[Special:Contributions/96.226.27.241|96.226.27.241]] ([[User talk:96.226.27.241|talk]]) 19:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
-== Vandalism of Photo in Article ==
-The 'booking photo' in the article appears to have been vandalized. It looks like a herpes bump has been photoshopped onto Paris Hiltons Lip. Can someone please replace with the original photo?
-[[Special:Contributions/24.8.106.182|24.8.106.182]] ([[User talk:24.8.106.182|talk]]) 16:41, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
-: Seems to have been taken care of, the current booking image is the same as the one that can be found a numerous news pages. --[[User talk:Amalthea|<span style="font-family:Verdana;font-variant:small-caps;color:#823824;font-weight:normal">Amalthea</span>]] 14:02, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
-== Petition to Governor Schwarzenegger to pardon Paris ==
-Hello. As the person who started the petition and who has met and spoken with Paris before, I wanted to contribute the following (see below) to the Paris Hilton page. Due to semi-protection, I can not add information into the article:
-Can this please be added in:
-"The petition to Governor Schwarzenegger was created and organized on May 5th, 2007 by Joshua Morales, a loyal fan of Ms. Hilton's who was upset by the sentence that Paris received from Judge Michael Sauer the day before on May 4th, 2007. "
-[http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20038172,00.html]Paris Hilton Asks For Schwarzenegger Pardon (People Magazine May 8, 2007) [[User:Musicfanjm|Musicfanjm]] 14:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
-:Could you perhapses enlighten us as to why you thought the governor should have pardoned her?  I've been trying to figure that out ever since I heard about the petition.[[User:The Goat|The Goat]] 21:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
-She didn't need a pardon, she needed a longer sentence...what she got was hardly even a slap on the wrist.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/65.33.59.183|65.33.59.183]] ([[User talk:65.33.59.183|talk]]) 15:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-== More parody ==
-[[Totally Spies]] featured an episode with a character called Milan Stilton. Complete with small(robotic) dog.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/202.156.10.12|202.156.10.12]] ([[User talk:202.156.10.12|talk]]) 04:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-:We would need an external source saying that it was indeed a parody of Paris Hilton, else that would be drawing conclusions based on your own opinions...-[[User:Localzuk|Localzuk]]<sup>[[User talk:Localzuk|(talk)]]</sup> 16:28, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
-That's both counter intuitive and counter productive. [[Special:Contributions/220.236.175.95|220.236.175.95]] ([[User talk:220.236.175.95|talk]]) 16:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
-== Why doesn't this article mention Paris Hilton's plastic surgery? ==
-Why doesn't this article mention Paris Hilton's plastic surgery?  [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0385296/bio Notable source IMDB mentions it.]  And [http://www.bigplansbigcrash.com/paris-hilton-as-a-teenager-plastic-surgery-rules.html here's actual pictures of the difference.]  And now [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Paris+Hilton%22+%22plastic+surgery%22 here's a lot more links due to google.] Discuss please!!! [[User:William Ortiz|William Ortiz]] 07:00, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
-:Thank you for your suggestion{{{{#if:notsubsted||subst:}}#if:{{{1|}}}|&#32;regarding [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a [[wiki]], so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the '''{{MediaWiki:edit}}''' link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|be bold in updating pages]]. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out [[Wikipedia:how to edit a page|''how to edit a page'']], or use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] to try out your editing skills.  [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|New contributors are always welcome]]. You don't even need to [[Special:Userlogin|log in]] (although there are [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|many reasons why you might want to]]).  <!-- Template:Sofixit --> &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 07:09, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
-::I wanted to be sure the article isn't ommitting it due to some BLP reason. [[User:William Ortiz|William Ortiz]] 10:39, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
-:::The site you refer to as "here's actual pictures of the difference" is a bit tacky IMO.  I suggest not using any reference to that site for BLP reasons.  [[User:Wanderer57|Wanderer57]] 22:06, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
-Paris hasn't had plastic surgery, she said it herself.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/92.15.7.6|92.15.7.6]] ([[User talk:92.15.7.6|talk]]) 20:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-== Paris Hiltons' age ==
-Paris Hilton is only 27 years old
-article 2 executve office requires 35 years old
-This may not be obvious to some people
-especially with her present "false president"
-campaign.
-Maybe this should be included in her main
-bio
-[[User:Blackbird1701|Blackbird1701]] ([[User talk:Blackbird1701|talk]]) 01:28, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
-: It says that she's 27 right at the top in the infobox, and the section is called "2008 ''parody'' Presidential campaign" (emphasis by me). I don't think it can be misread as an actual attempt to run for office. --<span style="font-family:Verdana;font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Amalthea|<span style='color:#823824'>Amalthea</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Amalthea|Talk]]</sup></span> 16:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
-== help ==
-how do you prevent someone from removing EVERY SINGLE POST that i add? everytime i bring up a valid point, someone who thinks that you can disagree with FACTS (impossible to do, by the way) deletes my edit. not edits to the article mind you. edits to the discussion page. so where do i take my complaints? since using wikipedia as a source is unreliable anyway, what is wrong with a little tabloid journalism, especially if it is true? wiki will NEVER be an encyclopedia , no matter how hard the overly serious wiki zealots try.  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Wellcraft11|Wellcraft11]] ([[User talk:Wellcraft11|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Wellcraft11|contribs]]) 12:59, 29 November 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-:As I said at your talk page after I removed your comment: ''Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons may '''not''' be added to articles or talk pages.''<br>The relevant policy and guideline pages at [[WP:V|Verifiability]], [[WP:BLP|Biographies of living persons]] and [[WP:RS|Reliable sources]] have been pointed out to you on your talk page, by Acalamari and myself. If you choose to ignore them and just keep on with it then I'm not sure how I can help you.<br>Cheers, <span style="font-family:Verdana;font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Amalthea|<span style='color:#823824'>Amalthea</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Amalthea|Talk]]</sup></span> 15:01, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
-you've been told multiple times about wikipedia's [[WP:BLP]] policy and the importance of reliable sources. calling something a fact doesn't mean it's a reliably sourced fact that is appropriate for this encyclopedia. i suggest that you become more familiar with the editing policy before trying to make any more claims or additions to the article. note: the rules apply to talk pages also. this isn't a message board. [[User:Theserialcomma|Theserialcomma]] ([[User talk:Theserialcomma|talk]]) 20:20, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
-== editors ==
-article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views. that's directly from the "talk page guidelines". now try to discuss adding something negative to the article about paris hilton and watch how quickly amalthea or acalamari remove your post. i simply asked if some negative info. about paris should be added to the article and my whole post was removed. but if you say "there's a rumor she's going to be in guinness..." as in the "controversy" section above, that's ok? a rumor about the guinness book is a reliable enough source to remain on the discussion page? i'm sure there is a more appropriate place for me to complain. anyone know where to do that? thanx.
-:Check out [[WP:BLP]]. That should provide the info on why your comments are being removed. And tabloids are not reliable sources for scandalous/ defamatory material.--[[User:Terrillja|<font color="003300">Terrillja</font>]][[User Talk:Terrillja|<font color="black"><sub> talk</sub></font>]] 19:14, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
-: Did you happen to notice that that very claim '''She will reportedly appear in the 2007 Guinness World Records as the world's "Most Overrated Celebrity''{{" '}} is backed up immediately with a source: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0608/16/sbt.01.html<br>That's something you failed to do even after being told so by three people. Give us one, and we ''have'' something to discuss, your thread is still here. Until you do though, per [[WP:BLP]], this discussion is moo[[Joey Tribbiani|t]]. --<span style="font-family:Verdana;font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Amalthea|<span style='color:#823824'>Amalthea</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Amalthea|Talk]]</sup></span> 19:20, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
-:Amalthea has actually been very patient with you, Wellcraft11, and a few months ago, even I gave you some advice regarding biographies of living persons. Unfortunately, despite our advice, you've continued to ask about why (unsourced) negative information keeps getting removed, and have added more of it to the talk page. As for the removal of comments, only comments that violate BLP or contain attacks [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Acalamari&diff=prev&oldid=251365535 like this] have been removed. In addition, now that you've [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AWellcraft11&diff=255039324&oldid=254630374 cleared our advice] from your talk page, I don't see how we can help you any further. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 20:14, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
-:: 1. both of you need to read the section above titled "comments about the editing process"
-:: 2. in your comments above, i don't care where or how it's sourced, the phrase "she will reportedly be featured..." reportedly, allegedly, possibly, maybe, might be....words that are used for things that are NOT FACTS, but NOT DELETED by paris' two wiki publicists.
-:: 3. i'm not trying to alter this persons biography. i'm just trying to ask why her herpes is not included in the article. paris herself has admitted that everything from the storage unit was hers, that includes the valtrex. again, i'm not trying to add it, but several people on this page have given good reason, yet it hasn't been added. simply asking the question is  NOT reason enough to continue removing my posts.
-:: 4. paris hilton is a product of tabloid tv and journalism. without E tv, we wouldn't know who paris is. therefore, what is wrong with including tabloid facts in the article? she is famous only for her scandalous life, so what is wrong with giving her what she wants, even if it is negative. the article itself talks about her becoming popular because of the tabloids
-:: 5. she wears a shirt with her personal catch phrase on it, and it is not spelled correctly. how better to source that? can we add that she is a notorious liar? she sat with david letterman and stated that she has never taken any money from her family. how can you source that any better? if i say the sky is blue, but don't have a source, does that make it untrue or is that info. so overwhelmingly understood that it doesn't require a source?
-:: let me summarize... paris hilton is famous for acting like a retard and doing whatever she can to land her face in the tabloids. she is not famous because a perfume has her name on it, or she picked a pattern for a purse. why shouldn't the article reflect that? you behave like an idiot, you get treated like an idiot. any article about her that does not focus on what a buffoon she is, is an incomplete article. since when is public knowledge not a reliable source of information? and again, i am not saying "take my word for it, and put it in the article". i am asking why this type of info. isn't in the article, and i am asking on the DISCUSSION page.
-:: <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Wellcraft11 |Wellcraft11 ]] ([[User talk:Wellcraft11 |talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Wellcraft11 |contribs]])  15:21, 4 December 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned2 -->
-::# Right back at you. In particular the parts about reading [[WP:BLP]] and "if in doubt, leave it out".
-::# Funnily enough, that's '''*all*''' we care about, per [[WP:VERIFIABILITY]].
-::# Because it's a) not reliably sourced, and b) even the speculation for which there might be sources are completely irrelevant to an encyclopadic biography
-::# [[WP:Reliable source]], [[WP:TABLOID]]
-::# [[WP:Original research]], [[WP:PRIMARY]]
-:::This is the last time I'm replying to this. Read and understand the guidelines and policies I've listed. And "public knowledge" a reliable source? Seriously? --[[User talk:Amalthea|<span style="font-family:Verdana;font-variant:small-caps;color:#823824;font-weight:normal">Amalthea</span>]] 01:34, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
-== Education ==
-What type of educated person is she? Only High School?  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/89.74.115.55|89.74.115.55]] ([[User talk:89.74.115.55|talk]]) 06:03, 22 December 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-: There's an education section higher up / in the archives, it had [http://www.usatoday.com/life/2003-12-01-paris-interview_x.htm] claiming that she didn't attend college after high school. That's nothing to point out in the article however, it already mentions the high schools she attended. --[[User talk:Amalthea|<span style="font-family:Verdana;font-variant:small-caps;color:#823824;font-weight:normal">Amalthea</span>]] 14:02, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
-== Alleged Discriminatory Remarks ==
-This section she be removed from the main page as it is not verifiable. Even if the remarks were said, we do not know if they were in just,or were said under some influence. It smears Ms. Hilton even though the word "alleged" is stated.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/64.228.94.148|64.228.94.148]] ([[User talk:64.228.94.148|talk]]) 16:31, 28 December 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-: It seems to me that it is easily verifiable, and it also mentions that "she had obviously been drinking". However, I agree that this is given [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]]. Similarily, the [[Paris Hilton#Activism and politics|paragraph above that]] is also no better, and the [[Paris Hilton#Standing as a celebrity|Standing as a celebrity]] section could then be merged into the rest of the prose. All of those things are relatively minor issues, not in my opinion worth its own "Activism" section.<br>Opinions? --[[User talk:Amalthea|<span style="font-family:Verdana;font-variant:small-caps;color:#823824;font-weight:normal">Amalthea</span>]] 16:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
-::BTW, I gave them those titles, originally it was all lumped together as a "controversy" section. BLP's aren't supposed to have controversy sections so I tried to do something more neutral with it. It's not great, but it's better than what it started off as. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 01:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)