Jump to content

Talk:Omar Abdullah: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Undid revision 384709586 by 99.229.4.120 (talk)
Line 65: Line 65:
Democratically elected Chief Minster cannot be called a puppet. The shopian case was finally proved to be a fraud.Lacks neutrality to say the least
Democratically elected Chief Minster cannot be called a puppet. The shopian case was finally proved to be a fraud.Lacks neutrality to say the least
[[User:Gs44631|Gs44631]] ([[User talk:Gs44631|talk]]) 07:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
[[User:Gs44631|Gs44631]] ([[User talk:Gs44631|talk]]) 07:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

== FREE KASHMIR FROM INDIA !!! ==

Revision as of 02:35, 14 September 2010

WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
WikiProject iconIndia: Jammu and Kashmir / Politics Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup.


IP 70.78.86.89

Pls do not keep adding point of views to the page. Pls discuss on the discussion page before adding non verifiable information. Lost 01:35, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


From the current editor:

  • I fail to see how stating facts is vandalizing.
  • It is a fact that:
  • -Most people consider the election of Mr Abdullah as undemocratic.
  • -It is a fact that he suffered a humiliting defeat in the assembly elections.
  • -It is a fact that most senior party members defected from the NC after his nomination as peresident.
  • -If I were vandalizing, I would delete most other facts such as his election to the Lok Sabha (Which I did not).
  • -Please research the topic first, before considering my points as "nonsense".
  • Have yourself a good one.
All I am saying is that wikipedia needs sources to cite whatever you are citing. If you can cite sources for your additions, its ok. Else the comments will be reverted again. -- Lost 17:39, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The general public using Wikipedia and wanting to research Mr Omar Abdullah would benefit from knowing his political standing in Kashmir.

  • I wonder how it would benefit a Wikipedia user to know that Mr Omar Abdullah likes horseback riding? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.78.86.89 (talkcontribs)
Yes, to improve the quality of the stub, such trivial info can be taken out. However, comments added by you, such as:
  • Many see his take over of the NC party leadership as a non-democratic carry-over of an autocratic system
  • His nomination as the new president of the NC party saw many resignations from senior party leaders
  • As a sign of the discontent with the Abdullah Familie's monopoly on the party
  • remains active, although shunned by the local populace

need citations from good sources, else they will be considered points of view. -- Lost 17:50, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

I will shortly be rewriting the entire article as per MoS:BIO. Please feel free to add your valuable inputs. -- Lost 19:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 18:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pro-pakistani Vandalism on Omar Abdullah article

Today, I have come across vandalism at Omar Abdullah page from Last edit to Last edit after Vandalism by 91.72.158.111 Changing all Jammu and Kashmir wiki links to Indian administered Kashmir etc, which is blatant vandalism --Ekabhishek (talk) 05:14, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


This is not pro-pakistani vandalism, this is pro-Kashmiri vandalism.

OMAR ABDULLAH IS NOT A KASHMIRI, HE WILL NEVER BE A KASHMIRI.


LANNAH ON OMAR ABDULLAH FOR FAILING TO PROTECT THE MODESTY AND LIVES OF KASHMIRI WOMEN.

BLAH BLAH BLAH, BLAH BLAH BLAH, honor, modesty, blah blah blah, siktir putka. Please stay far away Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.213.215 (talk) 14:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


==

Democratically elected Chief Minster cannot be called a puppet. The shopian case was finally proved to be a fraud.Lacks neutrality to say the least Gs44631 (talk) 07:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]