Talk:Lanny A. Breuer: Difference between revisions
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Hello. A bit unhappy and also a bit sceptical as to the unbiassed bent of Wiki now. Breuer def needs a thorough section on his obvious involvement in Operation Fast & Furious. There are PLENTY of subjects on this website where suspicions of involvement are parsed and detailed. This page on Breuer should be no exception. When Americans are killed with guns the DEA gave to Mexican thugs, they should be able to know that. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Scrapette Jones|Scrapette Jones]] ([[User talk:Scrapette Jones|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Scrapette Jones|contribs]]) 01:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Hello. A bit unhappy and also a bit sceptical as to the unbiassed bent of Wiki now. Breuer def needs a thorough section on his obvious involvement in Operation Fast & Furious. There are PLENTY of subjects on this website where suspicions of involvement are parsed and detailed. This page on Breuer should be no exception. When Americans are killed with guns the DEA gave to Mexican thugs, they should be able to know that. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Scrapette Jones|Scrapette Jones]] ([[User talk:Scrapette Jones|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Scrapette Jones|contribs]]) 01:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== |
== 'Fast and Furious' scandal information is censorship-banned on Wikipedia == |
||
Some helpful person named [[Edinburgh Wanderer]] removed my edits related to Senator Grassley asking for the resignation of Breuer, and the articles stating (in clear language, in the title) that Breuer got caught lying. "Contributions not constructive". Really. |
Some helpful person named [[Edinburgh Wanderer]] removed my edits related to Senator Grassley asking for the resignation of Breuer, and the articles stating (in clear language, in the title) that Breuer got caught lying. "Contributions not constructive". Really. |
||
Revision as of 18:04, 8 January 2012
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | Biography Unassessed | ||||||
| |||||||
Untitled
Hey, regarding the speedy deletion tag, I made this page because I looked him up after the NY Times ran a story about Roger Clemens' upcoming testimony to Congress -- Breuer was retained to represent Clemens. All that came up was http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton in which Breuer is one of only two lawyers on Clinton's defense team with no individual page.Shayanakadidal (talk) 05:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Lanny Breuer needs sections added on Fast & Furious and Roger Clemmons defense
Hello. A bit unhappy and also a bit sceptical as to the unbiassed bent of Wiki now. Breuer def needs a thorough section on his obvious involvement in Operation Fast & Furious. There are PLENTY of subjects on this website where suspicions of involvement are parsed and detailed. This page on Breuer should be no exception. When Americans are killed with guns the DEA gave to Mexican thugs, they should be able to know that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scrapette Jones (talk • contribs) 01:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
'Fast and Furious' scandal information is censorship-banned on Wikipedia
Some helpful person named Edinburgh Wanderer removed my edits related to Senator Grassley asking for the resignation of Breuer, and the articles stating (in clear language, in the title) that Breuer got caught lying. "Contributions not constructive". Really.
Maybe in Edinburgh, that's how things work. But in the United States, we call that censorship.
Dudes, this is an encyclopedia. Not the.... I don't know what. Whatever it is that you edit at-will and erase at-will in Edinburgh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turtlewaxingmycar (talk • contribs) 17:55, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- i suggest you read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. if you can comply with that then go ahead but it must be neutral. Also the reason your edits were reverted were because [[1]] gloo identified them as vandalism. Edinburgh Wanderer 17:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)