Talk:Great Southern Bank: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Joel.grace (talk) to last version by Smurdah |
Joel.grace (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{WP Australia|class=Stub}} |
{{WP Australia|class=Stub}} |
||
{{cooperatives|class=stub|importance=low}} |
{{cooperatives|class=stub|importance=low}} |
||
This reads like an advert for CUA. I use CUA, and even I don't think they are ''that'' good! In fact, I have a deep suspicion that they are positioning themselves to turn into yet another dreadful Australian bank, exactly like St George did. Just my subjective cynicism, but this article strikes me as overly enthusiastic. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/122.110.180.37|122.110.180.37]] ([[User talk:122.110.180.37|talk]]) 13:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 06:30, 27 August 2009
![]() | Business Stub‑class | |||||||||
|
![]() | Australia Stub‑class ![]() ![]() | |||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Cooperatives Stub‑class (inactive) | ||||||
|