Jump to content

Steptoean positive carbon isotope excursion

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Steptoean positive carbon isotope excursion (SPICE) is a global chemostratigraphic event which occurred during the upper Cambrian period between 497 and 494 million years ago.[1] This event corresponds with the ICS Guzhangian-Paibian Stage boundary and the Marjuman-Steptoean stage boundary in North America.[2] The general signature of the SPICE event is a positive δ13C excursion, characterized by a 4 to 6 ‰ (per mille) shift in δ13C values[1][2] within carbonate successions around the world.[3] SPICE was first described in 1993,[4] and then named later in 1998.[3] In both these studies, the SPICE excursion was identified and trends were observed within Cambrian formations of the Great Basin of the western United States.[3]

Age

[edit]

The age of the SPICE is dated to between 497 to 494 MA, where it has primarily been identified through the use of relative dating and biostratigraphy. The onset of SPICE is generally accepted to correspond with the second wave of the End-Marjuman Biomere Extinction, and its termination corresponds to the End-Steptoean Biomere Extinction.[1] Using trilobite and brachiopod index fossils linked to these extinctions, the upper and lower boundaries of the event can be defined. The beginning of the SPICE is identified by the extinction of shallow water polymerid trilobites, later replaced by deep water olenimorph trilobites following the observed peak δ13C value of the SPICE event.[5] The age of SPICE can also be determined based on its correlation with the well-known Sauk II- Sauk III Sequence boundary in North America. Furthermore, in addition to biostratigraphic markers the 3 million year time frame of the SPICE event has also been determined using calculated deposition rates and the length of some of the more extensively studied SPICE sequences.[2]

Localities, geology and δ13C characteristics

[edit]

Localities

[edit]
A map of SPICE localities during the upper Cambrian (500 Ma). Modified from the map published by Pulsipher et al., 2021.
A map of SPICE localities during the upper Cambrian (500 Ma). Points on the map denote the locations of formations and the color indicates the paleo-water depth. Modified image is originally sourced from Pulsipher et al., 2021.[2]

The SPICE event is expressed globally with known formations in 11 countries: United States, China, Australia, South Korea, Argentina, Canada, France, Kazakhstan, Scotland and Sweden (ordered by greatest to least number of localities). These locations span 4 modern continents (North America, Asia, Australia, Europe and South America), and represent 5 upper Cambrian paleocontinents: Laurentia, Gondwana, Kazakhstania, Siberia,[2] and Baultica.[6] All formations containing SPICE intervals formed between the paleolatitudes of 30°N and 60°S.[2] For a full list of SPICE localities and formation see the following maps and table.

Map
Modern localities of formations containing the SPICE excursion. See accompanying table for more detail.
Localities where the SPICE has been observed
(average shifts in δ13C values are derived from the Pulsipher et al. SPICEraq dataset[2])
Modern country Paleocontinent Average shift
in δ13C
values (‰) 		Formation
United States
(14 localities) 		Laurentia +3.18 ‰ Nevada:

Utah:

Southern Appalachians:

Other Areas:

  • Eau Claire Formation, Kentucky[17]
  • Franconia Formation, Illinois[18]
  • Rhinehart A-1 corehole (Hollandale "Embayment"), central Iowa[11]
  • Schodack Formation, New York[19]
  • Upper Bonneterre & Davis Formation, Southern Missouri[20][21]
  • Wind River Range, Wyoming[7]
China
(8 localities) 		Gondwana +3.15 ‰ North China:
  • Changshan Formation, Tangwangzhai section, Gushan, Shangdong Province[22]
  • Chaomidian Formation, Shandong Province[23][24]
  • Gushan Formation[23][24]
  • Huangyangshan (HYS) section, Shandong Province[25][26]

South China:

  • Huaqiao Formation, Wangcun & Paibi section, Hunan Province[22][27]
  • Huayansi Formation, Duibian A and B sections, western Zhejiang[25][26]
  • Upper Chefu & lower Bitiao Formation, Wa'ergang section, Northern Hunan Province[27][26]

Other Areas:

  • Yaerdang Mountain profile, North-West China[28]
Australia
(4 localities)
[Looks like 5] 		Gondwana +4.16 ‰ Queensland:

Northern Australia:

  • Arrinthrunga Formation, southern Georgina Basin[29]

Central Australia:

  • Upper Shannon Formation, NE Amadeus Basin[30]
  • Goyder Formation, Amadeus Basin[31]
South Korea
(2 localities) 		Gondwana +2.89 ‰
  • Machari Formation, Gangweon Province[32]
  • Sesong Formation[33]
Argentina
(2 localities) 		Gondwana +4.15 ‰
  • La Flecha Formation[34]
  • Zonda Formation[34]
Canada
(2 localities) 		Laurentia +3.02 ‰
  • March Point formation, Port au Port group, Newfoundland[11][35][36]
  • Petit Jadin formation, Port au Port group, Newfoundland[36]
France
(2 localities) 		Gondwana +5.11 ‰
  • Val d'Homs formation, Montagne Noire[37]
  • La Gardie formation, Montagne Noire[37]
Kazakhstan
(1 locality) 		Kazakhstania +5.34 ‰
  • Furongian Kyrshabakty section, southern Kazakhstan[38]
Scotland
(1 locality) 		Laurentia +3.42 ‰
  • Eilean Dubh Formation, Northern Scotland[39]
Russia
(1 locality) 		Siberia +4.32 ‰
  • Kulyumbe Formation, Siberian Platform, Siberia[40]
Sweden
(1 locality) 		Baltica +1.5 ‰[41]
  • Alum Shale Formation[6]

Geology

[edit]

Formations containing SPICE excursions are highly variable with geologic characteristics varying greatly amongst localities. Stratigraphic thickness in particular has very large ranges between locations, with the smallest being the Wangliangyu section of China which is less than 3m. This thickness is in contrast to the Kulyumbe section of Siberia which is greater than 800m. This variability of stratigraphic thickness suggests that the regional deposition rates during the 497 Ma to 494 Ma SPICE period were not globally uniform and more regionally dependent.[2]

Furthermore, formations containing the SPICE excursion represent a wide variety of lithologies, facies and water depths. In terms of lithology, all SPICE intervals are contained within carbonate units within carbonate and silicate sequences. The most common lithology for SPICE intervals are micritic limestones, or carbonate shales, generally interbedded with thin layers of calcareous mudstone.[21][1] SPICE intervals have also been observed in dolostone units, however these are not as common as the carbonate rocks.[2] SPICE intervals are also highly variable when it comes to facies, with examples for shallow, intermediate and deep water settings (see map in the localities section).[2] Considering the two most prominent areas of study, Laurentian formations (USA) tend to have stronger representation from shallow and intermediate facies (shallow/ near shore, shelf, intrashelf basin),[5][21] while Gondwanan sections (China & Australia) have better representation of deep water facies (slope and basin), along with shallow and intermediate facies.[2]

Stages of SPICE

[edit]
Figure showing the six stages of the SPICE: pre-SPICE, early SPICE, rising SPICE, plateau, falling SPICE, and post SPICE. Graph line shows how values of δ13C shift through each stage.
The six stages of the SPICE. The red line indicates the δ13C value. Plot modified from Pulsipher et al., 2021[2] and Zhang et al., 2023.[1]

Defining standard δ13C values of the SPICE interval, it can be noted the magnitude is highly variable from location to location, with maximum excursion values ranging from 0.64 ‰ to 8.03 ‰. Regardless of values though, the SPICE interval can be identified based on a similar pattern observed in each sequence. This pattern is identified based on 6 distinct stages: pre-SPICE, early SPICE, rising SPICE,[1] plateau,[2] falling SPICE, and post SPICE[1] (see figure for visual representation of each stage).

Stage 1: Pre-SPICE

[edit]

All areas of the section prior to the onset of the SPICE interval. δ13C values remain near 0 ‰, similar to modern marine dissolved inorganic carbon.[1][2]

Stage 2: Early SPICE

[edit]

Onset of SPICE, characterized by a slow increase in δ13C from 0 to approximately 1 ‰, suggesting a gradual increase in organic carbon burial and decrease in oceanic 12C.[1][2]

Stage 3: Rising SPICE

[edit]

Rapid increase in δ13C from the early SPICE value to the max value. This shift in value is generally between 3 ‰ and 6 ‰, suggesting a rapid increase in organic carbon burial.[1][2] The onset of the rising SPICE also generally corresponds to fossil indicators for the 2nd stage of the end-Marjuman biomere extinction.

Stage 4: Plateau

[edit]

δ13C values fluctuate but remain near the maximum value for a period of time. This stage is not observed in all SPICE intervals. After reaching the maximum value, most intervals proceed immediately into stage 5, the falling SPICE.[2]

Stage 5: Falling SPICE

[edit]

Rapid decrease from the maximum δ13C value to near the standard ocean water value (0 ‰). The rate of decrease in the falling SPICE is generally more rapid then the rate of increase in the Rising SPICE. Generally interpreted as ocean water returning to standard δ13C levels.[1][2]

Stage 6: Post SPICE

[edit]

All areas of the section immediately following the termination of SPICE.[1][2]

Factors affecting the magnitude of the δ13C anomaly

[edit]

Despite being a global event, the magnitude of δ13C values observed within a SPICE interval appear to be highly affected by a variety of local conditions. A few common trends that have been determined are as follows:

  1. Higher paleolatitude formations (greater than 30°S) tend to have lower δ13C values throughout the sequence.
  2. Shallower facies have lower values than deeper facies.
  3. Limestone tends to have marginally higher δ13C than dolostone.[2]

Proposed mechanism

[edit]

Regional sea level changes,[22][11] cooling of upper sea water from the deep ocean,[1] ocean anoxia/euoxia,[9][1] and trilobite and brachiopod extinctions[5][30] are all associated with the SPICE event. This combination of factors creates the conditions for the primary mechanism of formation for the SPICE, an increase in the burial of organic carbon, caused by increased primary productivity (e.g. photosynthesis).

The spread of deep ocean anoxia or euxinia, indicated by a positive correlated δ34SCAS excursion and increased pyrite burial,[9] created conditions encouraging the preservation of deposited organic material and stressful conditions for the marine organisms.[1] Initially, these conditions would have spread slowly, limited to deep environments and having small impacts on the global carbon system. This slow initial change is represented by the gradual and small δ13C changes of the early SPICE. As time passed though, causes of anoxic/euxinia conditions increased and moving up the shelf into shallower facies. This combined with other factors such as ocean level regression (such as the Sauk II-Sauk III in North America),[11] and global cooling of the atmosphere and oceans, increased pressure was imposed on ocean ecosystems. This increase in pressure likely triggered the second wave of the End-Marjuman Biomere Extinction,[1] resulting in the disappearance of many shallow-water trilobite and brachiopod species from the fossil record at this time.[5]

With the extinction of these trilobites and brachiopods, photosynthetic primary producers likely flourished as a result of decreased predation. This combined with an increase in burial from expanding anoxic conditions and less bioturbation from now extinct ocean floor dwelling organisms would likely cause δ13C values to sharply rise.[1] This sharp rise is captured in the SPICE through the rising SPICE stage, in which δ13C values reflect this rapid change in primary productivity and burial following the extinction.[2] Finally, moving out of the End-Marjuman Biomere Extinction and into the falling SPICE, oceans likely experience significant recovery in biodiversity. Following the extinction of shallow water taxa, the better adapted deep water olenimorph trilobite fauna begin to diversify. Filling the shallow water environments left vacant by the End-Marjuman Biomere extinction.[5] This return of secondary producers, along with reductions in anoxic conditions caused by changes in climate and stabilizing ocean levels causing reductions in primary productivity and organic carbon burial.[1] Rapidly reducing δ13C values, and stabilizing to more standard ocean δ13C values observed in the post SPICE stage.[2]

Controversies

[edit]

One question still being researched in relation to the SPICE is the potential of an undescribed negative δ13C excursion directly before the early SPICE stage. This undetermined negative excursion does not appear at all localities. It is theorized this excursion may have remained undetected as a result of sampling discrepancies or because it only represents a local event.[2] Another key controversy of the SPICE is its exact timing in relation to the end-Marjuman biomere extinction, and the end-Steptoean biomere extinction. Currently research can only link the onset of the SPICE to the second wave of the end-Marjuman extinction. More research is required to determine if and how the first wave of the extinction relates to SPICE.[5] Furthermore, there is still a great deal of questions about SPICE and its implication for large biodiversity events occurring in the post SPICE such as the end-Steptoean biomere extinction and Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE). Some research suggests that the turnover in trilobite and brachiopod species that occurred during the SPICE may have a direct correlation with these subsequent events.[2]

Comparison to other anomalies

[edit]

Hirnantian Isotopic Carbon Excursion (HICE)

[edit]

Similar to the SPICE, the HICE event is linked to changes in the climate and falls in global sea level, resulting in anoxic conditions and an increase in organic carbon burial. δ13C values for the HICE have a similar positive magnitude, ranging from ~+2‰ to ~+7‰. Furthermore, similar to SPICE, the HICE event likely occurred over a small time period. Occurring in the upper Ordovician and lasting less than 1.3 Ma. One difference between the HICE and SPICE though, is the HICE is generally restricted to shallow water carbonate facies.[42]

Silurian Ireviken event

[edit]

This early Silurian (431 Ma) δ13C excursion also shows similarities to the SPICE event, with positive max δ13C values around 4.5‰. Similar to the SPICE, research suggests this event is linked to falling ocean levels and a faunal turnover. Similar to SPICE, the Ireviken event also has a positive δ34SCAS excursion correlated with the δ13C excursion. Suggesting the influence of anoxic conditions and increased organic carbon burial. Furthermore, the Ireviken event also has global occurrences, but their expression is highly influenced by local facies characteristics, similar to SPICE.[43]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Zhang, Lei; Algeo, Thomas J.; Zhao, Laishi; Dahl, Tais W.; Chen, Zhong-Qiang; Zhang, Zihu; Poulton, Simon W.; Hughes, Nigel C.; Gou, Xueqing; Li, Chao (2023-05-12). "Environmental and trilobite diversity changes during the middle-late Cambrian SPICE event". Geological Society of America Bulletin. doi:10.1130/b36421.1. ISSN 0016-7606.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x Pulsipher, Mikaela A.; Schiffbauer, James D.; Jeffrey, Matthew J.; Huntley, John Warren; Fike, David A.; Shelton, Kevin L. (2021-01-01). "A meta-analysis of the Steptoean Positive Carbon Isotope Excursion: The SPICEraq database". Earth-Science Reviews. 212: 103442. Bibcode:2021ESRv..21203442P. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103442. ISSN 0012-8252.
  3. ^ a b c d e Saltzman, Matthew; Runnegar, Bruce; Lohmann, Kyger (1998-03-01). <0285:CISOUC>2.3.CO;2 "Carbon isotope stratigraphy of Upper Cambrian (Steptoean Stage) sequences of the eastern Great Basin: Record of a global oceanographic event". Geological Society of America Bulletin - GEOL SOC AMER BULL. 110 (3): 285–297. Bibcode:1998GSAB..110..285S. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1998)110<0285:CISOUC>2.3.CO;2.
  4. ^ Brasier, M. D. (1993-01-01). "Towards a carbon isotope stratigraphy of the Cambrian System: potential of the Great Basin succession". Geological Society, London, Special Publications. 70 (1): 341–350. Bibcode:1993GSLSP..70..341B. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.1993.070.01.22. ISSN 0305-8719.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h Gerhardt, Angela M.; Gill, Benjamin C. (2016-11-01). "Elucidating the relationship between the later Cambrian end-Marjuman extinctions and SPICE Event". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 461: 362–373. Bibcode:2016PPP...461..362G. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.08.031.
  6. ^ a b Rooney, Alan D.; Millikin, Alexie E.G.; Ahlberg, Per (2022-03-24). "Re-Os geochronology for the Cambrian SPICE event: Insights into euxinia and enhanced continental weathering from radiogenic isotopes". Geology. 50 (6): 716–720. Bibcode:2022Geo....50..716R. doi:10.1130/g49833.1. ISSN 0091-7613.
  7. ^ a b c Saltzman, Matthew R.; Davidson, Jon P.; Holden, Peter; Runnegar, Bruce; Lohmann, Kyger C. (1995-10-01). "Sea-level-driven changes in ocean chemistry at an Upper Cambrian extinction horizon". Geology (Boulder). 23 (10): 893–896. Bibcode:1995Geo....23..893S. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<0893:SLDCIO>2.3.CO;2.
  8. ^ a b Baker, Jonathan Lloyd (2010). "Carbon isotopic fractionation across a late Cambrian carbonate platform: A regional response to the spice event as recorded in the Great Basin, United States". ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  9. ^ a b c d e Gill, Benjamin C.; Lyons, Timothy W.; Young, Seth A.; Kump, Lee R.; Knoll, Andrew H.; Saltzman, Matthew R. (2011-01-06). "Geochemical evidence for widespread euxinia in the Later Cambrian ocean". Nature. 469 (7328): 80–83. Bibcode:2011Natur.469...80G. doi:10.1038/nature09700. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 21209662.
  10. ^ Olsen, Amelia E. (2022-10-10). "Skeletal Abundance During the Cambrian Spice Event, Western Utah". Geological Society of America. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. 54 (4). GSA. doi:10.1130/abs/2022am-378780.
  11. ^ a b c d e Saltzman, Matthew R.; Cowan, Clinton A.; Runkel, Anthony C.; Runnegar, Bruce; Stewart, Michael C.; Palmer, Allison R. (2004-05-01). "The Late Cambrian Spice (δ13C) Event and the Sauk II-SAUK III Regression: New Evidence from Laurentian Basins in Utah, Iowa, and Newfoundland". Journal of Sedimentary Research. 74 (3): 366–377. Bibcode:2004JSedR..74..366S. doi:10.1306/120203740366.
  12. ^ a b Glumac, Bosiljka; Walker, Kenneth R (1998-11-01). "A Late Cambrian positive carbon-isotope excursion in the Southern Appalachians; relation to biostratigraphy, sequence stratigraphy, environments of deposition, and diagenesis". Journal of Sedimentary Research. 68 (6): 1211–1222. Bibcode:1998JSedR..68.1212G. doi:10.2110/jsr.68.1212.
  13. ^ Glumac, Bosiljka (2011-10-01). "High-resolution stratigraphy and correlation of Cambrian strata using carbon isotopes: an example from the southern Appalachians, USA". Carbonates and Evaporites. 26 (3): 287–297. Bibcode:2011CarEv..26..287G. doi:10.1007/s13146-011-0065-2. ISSN 1878-5212.
  14. ^ Mackey, Justin E.; Stewart, Brian W. (2019-08-15). "Evidence of SPICE-related anoxia on the Laurentian passive margin: Paired δ13C and trace element chemostratigraphy of the upper Conasauga Group, Central Appalachian Basin". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 528: 160–174. Bibcode:2019PPP...528..160M. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.04.018.
  15. ^ Gerhardt, Angela M.; Gill, Benjamin C. (2016-11-01). "Elucidating the relationship between the later Cambrian end-Marjuman extinctions and SPICE Event". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 461: 362–373. Bibcode:2016PPP...461..362G. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.08.031. ISSN 0031-0182.
  16. ^ LeRoy, Matthew A.; Gill, Benjamin C. (2019-07-01). "Evidence for the development of local anoxia during the Cambrian SPICE event in eastern North America". Geobiology. 17 (4): 381–400. Bibcode:2019Gbio...17..381L. doi:10.1111/gbi.12334. ISSN 1472-4677. PMID 30729650.
  17. ^ LeRoy, Matthew A.; Gill, Benjamin C. (2019-07-01). "Evidence for the development of local anoxia during the Cambrian SPICE event in eastern North America". Geobiology. 17 (4): 381–400. Bibcode:2019Gbio...17..381L. doi:10.1111/gbi.12334. ISSN 1472-4677. PMID 30729650.
  18. ^ Labotka, Dana M.; Freiburg, Jared T. (2020). "Geochemical Preservation of the Steptoean Positive Carbon Isotope Excursion (SPICE) Event in Dolomites of the Furongian Franconia Formation in the Illinois Basin". Illinois State Geological Survey, Prairie Research Institute. 600.
  19. ^ Glumac, Bosiljka; Mutti, Laurel E. (2007-05-01). "Late Cambrian (Steptoean) sedimentation and responses to sea-level change along the northeastern Laurentian margin: Insights from carbon isotope stratigraphy". Geological Society of America Bulletin. 119 (5–6): 623–636. Bibcode:2007GSAB..119..623G. doi:10.1130/B25897.1.
  20. ^ He, Zhenhao (1995). "Sedimentary Facies and Variation of Stable Isotope Composition of Upper Cambrian to Lower Ordovician Strata in Southern Missouri: Implications for the Origin of MVT Deposits, and the Geochemical and Hydrological Features of Regional Ore-Forming Fluids". University of Missouri-Rolla. 9611858.
  21. ^ a b c Schiffbauer, James D; Huntley, John Warren; Fike, David A; Jeffrey, Matthew Jarrell; Gregg, Jay M; Shelton, Kevin L (2017-03-03). "Decoupling biogeochemical records, extinction, and environmental change during the Cambrian SPICE event". Science Advances. 3 (3): e1602158. Bibcode:2017SciA....3E2158S. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602158. PMC 5336349. PMID 28275734 – via 10.1126/ sciadv.1602158.
  22. ^ a b c d Saltzman, Matthew R.; Ripperdan, Robert L.; Brasier, M.D.; Lohmann, Kyger C.; Robison, Richard A.; Chang, W.T.; Peng, Shanchi; Ergaliev, E.K.; Runnegar, Bruce (2000-10-01). "A global carbon isotope excursion (SPICE) during the Late Cambrian: relation to trilobite extinctions, organic-matter burial and sea level". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 162 (3–4): 211–223. Bibcode:2000PPP...162..211S. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00128-0.
  23. ^ a b Chen, Jitao; Chough, S.K.; Han, Zuozhen; Lee, Jeong-Hyun (2011-01-01). "An extensive erosion surface of a strongly deformed limestone bed in the Gushan and Chaomidian formations (late Middle Cambrian to Furongian), Shandong Province, China: Sequence–stratigraphic implications". Sedimentary Geology. 233 (1–4): 129–149. Bibcode:2011SedG..233..129C. doi:10.1016/j.sedgeo.2010.11.002.
  24. ^ a b Wang, Zhaopeng; Chen, Jitao; Liang, Taitao; Yuan, Jinliang; Han, Chao; Liu, Jiaye; Zhu, Chenlin; Zhu, Decheng; Han, Zuozhen (2020-05-15). "Spatial variation in carbonate carbon isotopes during the Cambrian SPICE event across the eastern North China Platform". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 546: 109669. Bibcode:2020PPP...54609669W. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2020.109669.
  25. ^ a b Zuo, Jingxun; Peng, Shanchi; Qi, Yuping; Zhu, Xuejian; Bagnoli, Gabriella; Fang, Huaibin (2018-06-01). "Carbon-Isotope Excursions Recorded in the Cambrian System, South China: Implications for Mass Extinctions and Sea-Level Fluctuations". Journal of Earth Science. 29 (3): 479–491. Bibcode:2018JEaSc..29..479Z. doi:10.1007/s12583-017-0963-x. ISSN 1674-487X.
  26. ^ a b c Li, Dandan; Zhang, Xiaolin; Hu, Dongping; Chen, Xiaoyan; Huang, Wei; Zhang, Xu; Li, Menghan; Qin, Liping; Peng, Shanchi; Shen, Yanan (2018-07-01). "Evidence of a large δ13Ccarb and δ13Corg depth gradient for deep-water anoxia during the late Cambrian SPICE event". Geology. 46 (7): 631–634. Bibcode:2018Geo....46..631L. doi:10.1130/G40231.1. ISSN 0091-7613.
  27. ^ a b Zhu, Mao-Yan; Zhang, Jun-Ming; Li, Guo-Xiang; Yang, Ai-Hua (2004-03-01). "Evolution of C isotopes in the Cambrian of China: implications for Cambrian subdivision and trilobite mass extinctions". Geobios. 37 (2): 287–301. Bibcode:2004Geobi..37..287Z. doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2003.06.001.
  28. ^ Liu, Hu; Liao, Zewen; Zhang, Haizu; Tian, Yankuan; Cheng, Bin; Yang, Shan (2017-01-01). "Stable isotope (δ13Cker, δ13Ccarb, δ18Ocarb) distribution along a Cambrian outcrop section in the eastern Tarim Basin, NW China and its geochemical significance". Geoscience Frontiers. 8 (1): 163–170. doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2016.02.004.
  29. ^ Lindsay, John F.; Kruse, Peter D.; Green, Owen R.; Hawkins, Elizabeth; Brasier, Martin D.; Cartlidge, Julie; Corfield, Richard M. (2005-12-01). "The Neoproterozoic–Cambrian record in Australia: A stable isotope study". Precambrian Research. 143 (1–4): 113–133. Bibcode:2005PreR..143..113L. doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2005.10.002.
  30. ^ a b Smith, Patrick M.; Brock, Glenn A.; Paterson, John R. (2020-01-02). "Shelly fauna from the Cambrian (Miaolingian, Guzhangian) Shannon Formation and the SPICE event in the Amadeus Basin, Northern Territory". Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology. 44 (1): 1–24. Bibcode:2020Alch...44....1S. doi:10.1080/03115518.2019.1660405. ISSN 0311-5518.
  31. ^ Schmid, Susanne (2017-02-20). "Chemostratigraphy and palaeo-environmental characterisation of the Cambrian stratigraphy in the Amadeus Basin, Australia". Chemical Geology. 451: 169–182. Bibcode:2017ChGeo.451..169S. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.01.019.
  32. ^ Chung, Gong-Soo; Lee, Jeong-Gu; Lee, Kwang-Sik (2011-09-30). "Stable Carbon Isotope Stratigraphy of the Cambrian Machari Formation in the Yeongweol Area, Gangweon Province, Korea". Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society. 32 (5): 437–452. doi:10.5467/JKESS.2011.32.5.437. ISSN 1225-6692.
  33. ^ Lim, Jong Nam; Chung, Gong Soo; Park, Tae-Yoon S. (2015-12-31). "Lithofacies and Stable Carbon Isotope Stratigraphy of the Cambrian Sesong Formation in the Taebaeksan Basin, Korea". Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society. 36 (7): 617–631. doi:10.5467/JKESS.2015.36.7.617. ISSN 1225-6692.
  34. ^ a b Sial, A.N.; Peralta, S.; Ferreira, V.P.; Toselli, A.J.; Aceñolaza, F.G.; Parada, M.A.; Gaucher, C.; Alonso, R.N.; Pimentel, M.M. (2008-07-01). "Upper Cambrian carbonate sequences of the Argentine Precordillera and the Steptoean C-Isotope positive excursion (SPICE)". Gondwana Research. 13 (4): 437–452. Bibcode:2008GondR..13..437S. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2007.05.001. hdl:11336/70755.
  35. ^ Hurtgen, Matthew T.; Pruss, Sara B.; Knoll, Andrew H. (2009-05-15). "Evaluating the relationship between the carbon and sulfur cycles in the later Cambrian ocean: An example from the Port au Port Group, western Newfoundland, Canada". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 281 (3–4): 288–297. Bibcode:2009E&PSL.281..288H. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2009.02.033.
  36. ^ a b Barili, Rosalia; Neilson, Joyce Elaine; Brasier, Alexander Thomas; Goldberg, Karin; Pastro Bardola, Tatiana; De Ros, Luiz Fernando; Leng, Melanie (2018-11-01). "Carbon isotopes, stratigraphy, and environmental change: the Middle–Upper Cambrian Positive Excursion (SPICE) in Port au Port Group, western Newfoundland, Canada". Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 55 (11): 1209–1222. Bibcode:2018CaJES..55.1209B. doi:10.1139/cjes-2018-0025. hdl:1807/90557. ISSN 0008-4077.
  37. ^ a b Alvaro, J. J.; Bauluz, B.; Subias, I.; Pierre, C.; Vizcaino, D. (2008-07-01). "Carbon chemostratigraphy of the Cambrian-Ordovician transition in a midlatitude mixed platform, Montagne Noire, France". Geological Society of America Bulletin. 120 (7–8): 962–975. Bibcode:2008GSAB..120..962A. doi:10.1130/B26243.1. ISSN 0016-7606.
  38. ^ Wotte, Thomas; Strauss, Harald (2015-11-01). "Questioning a widespread euxinia for the Furongian (Late Cambrian) SPICE event: indications from δ 13 C, δ 18 O, δ 34 S and biostratigraphic constraints". Geological Magazine. 152 (6): 1085–1103. Bibcode:2015GeoM..152.1085W. doi:10.1017/S0016756815000187. ISSN 0016-7568.
  39. ^ Pruss, Sara B.; Jones, David S.; Fike, David A.; Tosca, Nicholas J.; Wignall, Paul B. (2019-05-01). "Marine anoxia and sedimentary mercury enrichments during the Late Cambrian SPICE event in northern Scotland". Geology. 47 (5): 475–478. Bibcode:2019Geo....47..475P. doi:10.1130/G45871.1. ISSN 0091-7613.
  40. ^ Kouchinsky, Artem; Bengtson, Stefan; Gallet, Yves; Korovnikov, Igor; Pavlov, Vladimir; Runnegar, Bruce; Shields, Graham; Veizer, Jan; Young, Edward; Ziegler, Karen (2008-05-23). "The SPICE carbon isotope excursion in Siberia: a combined study of the upper Middle Cambrian–lowermost Ordovician Kulyumbe River section, northwestern Siberian Platform". Geological Magazine. 145 (5): 609–622. Bibcode:2008GeoM..145..609K. doi:10.1017/S0016756808004913. ISSN 0016-7568.
  41. ^ Ahlberg, Per; Axheimer, Niklas; Babcock, Loren E.; Eriksson, Mats E.; Schmitz, Birger; Terfelt, Fredrik (2009-03-01). "Cambrian high-resolution biostratigraphy and carbon isotope chemostratigraphy in Scania, Sweden: first record of the SPICE and DICE excursions in Scandinavia". Lethaia. 42 (1): 2–16. Bibcode:2009Letha..42....2A. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.2008.00127.x. ISSN 0024-1164.
  42. ^ Jones, David S.; Brothers, R. William; Crüger Ahm, Anne-Sofie; Slater, Nicholas; Higgins, John A.; Fike, David A. (2020-02-01). "Sea level, carbonate mineralogy, and early diagenesis controlled δ13C records in Upper Ordovician carbonates". Geology. 48 (2): 194–199. Bibcode:2020Geo....48..194J. doi:10.1130/G46861.1. ISSN 0091-7613.
  43. ^ Rose, Catherine V.; Fischer, Woodward W.; Finnegan, Seth; Fike, David A. (2019-02-01). "Records of carbon and sulfur cycling during the Silurian Ireviken Event in Gotland, Sweden". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 246: 299–316. Bibcode:2019GeCoA.246..299R. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2018.11.030. hdl:10023/19002.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Steptoean_positive_carbon_isotope_excursion&oldid=1242230573"