Jump to content

Red Dog mine: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
Pollution: add moss study - mine pollution is big issue now in Alaska - many websites and TV ads report flat wrong misreading of 2001 study.
Line 72: Line 72:
The Red Dog mine provides over a quarter of the borough's wage and salary payroll. While many of the borough's residents benefit from the mine and associated economic activities, virtually all of the borough's residents rely on subsistence activities which are dependent on a healthy environment.<ref>Alaska Economic Trends, Alaska Department of Labor, Vol. 19, Num. 1, January 1999.</ref>
The Red Dog mine provides over a quarter of the borough's wage and salary payroll. While many of the borough's residents benefit from the mine and associated economic activities, virtually all of the borough's residents rely on subsistence activities which are dependent on a healthy environment.<ref>Alaska Economic Trends, Alaska Department of Labor, Vol. 19, Num. 1, January 1999.</ref>


==Environmental Concerns==
==Pollution==
According to the [[United States Environmental Protection Agency|U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]] (EPA),<ref name="Scorecard">[http://www.scorecard.org/ranking/rank-facilities.tcl?fips_state_code=Entire%20United%20States&type=mass&category=total_env&modifier=na&sic_2=All%20reporting%20sectors&how_many=100 Pollution Rankings by Facility]. Scorecard.org</ref> Red Dog mine releases more toxic waste into the environment than any other operation in the United States. As the EPA notes, "No conclusions on the potential risks can be made based solely on this information."

More than 99% of the reported toxic waste from Red Dog consists of unprocessed rock fragments, i.e., waste rock. This waste rock is simply moved to access the underlying zinc ore. The waste rock contains relatively high concentrations of metals (1 to 2%). Leaching of these metals into the environment is a valid concern. The waste rock piles are contained and all runoff water is monitored and treated to water quality standards.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.allbusiness.com/legal/laws-government-regulations-environmental/359205-1.html
|title=Mining and the Environment:Mines in Alaska face Challenges Due to Environmental Regulations
|publisher=Alaska Business Monthly
|date=March 1, 2005
}}</ref>


On [[June 13]], [[2007]] the State of Alaska removed two creeks (Red Dog Creek and Ikalukrok Creek) near the Red Dog mine in Northwest Alaska from the most-polluted waters list with EPA's approval.<ref>{{cite web
On [[June 13]], [[2007]] the State of Alaska removed two creeks (Red Dog Creek and Ikalukrok Creek) near the Red Dog mine in Northwest Alaska from the most-polluted waters list with EPA's approval.<ref>{{cite web
Line 87: Line 79:
|publisher=Anchorage Daily News
|publisher=Anchorage Daily News
|date=June 14, 2007
|date=June 14, 2007
}}</ref> The mine discharges treated water into Red Dog Creek, a tributary of Ikalukrok Creek. Pre-mining studies on Red Dog Creek revealed naturally high concentrations of cadmium, lead, zinc, aluminum, and other metals. Before mining began, aquatic life uses were not present in the main stem of Red Dog Creek because of the natural toxic concentrations and low Ph. After mining began, treatment of mine wastewater allowed a population of Arctic Grayling to establish themselves in Red Dog Creek. That fish population is now protected by regulations.<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> The mine discharges treated water into Red Dog Creek, a tributary of Ikalukrok Creek. Pre-mining studies on Red Dog Creek revealed naturally high concentrations of cadmium, lead, zinc, aluminum, and other metals. Before mining began, aquatic life uses were not present in the main stem of Red Dog Creek because of the natural toxic concentrations and low Ph. After mining began, year-round release of treated mine wastewater allowed a population of Arctic Grayling to establish themselves in Red Dog Creek. That fish population is now protected by regulations.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/standards/uaa/casestudies/ak_reddog.htm
|url=http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/standards/uaa/casestudies/ak_reddog.htm
|title=Red Dog Mine UAA
|title=Red Dog Mine UAA
Line 93: Line 85:
|date=August 8, 2007
|date=August 8, 2007
}}</ref>
}}</ref>

===Toxic Waste releases===
According to the [[United States Environmental Protection Agency|U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]] (EPA),<ref name="Scorecard">[http://www.scorecard.org/ranking/rank-facilities.tcl?fips_state_code=Entire%20United%20States&type=mass&category=total_env&modifier=na&sic_2=All%20reporting%20sectors&how_many=100 Pollution Rankings by Facility]. Scorecard.org</ref> Red Dog mine releases more toxic waste into the environment than any other operation in the United States. As the EPA notes, "No conclusions on the potential risks can be made based solely on this information."

More than 99% of the reported toxic waste from Red Dog consists of unprocessed rock fragments, i.e., waste rock. This waste rock is simply moved to access the underlying zinc ore. The waste rock contains relatively high concentrations of metals (1 to 2%). Leaching of these metals into the environment is a valid concern. The waste rock piles are contained and all runoff water is monitored and treated to water quality standards.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.allbusiness.com/legal/laws-government-regulations-environmental/359205-1.html
|title=Mining and the Environment:Mines in Alaska face Challenges Due to Environmental Regulations
|publisher=Alaska Business Monthly
|date=March 1, 2005
}}</ref>

===Heavy metals (lead and cadmium) in mosses adjacent to the haul road===

A 2001 study for the National Park Service (NPS) reports in its Executive Summary that, "Concentrations of Cd and Pb...exceed medians (and in most cases maxima) from all 28 countries in the Nordic moss monitoring program, including many of the most polluted countries in Central and Eastern Europe and all areas of western Russia."<ref>''Heavy Metals in Mosses and Soils on Six Transects Along the Red Dog Mine Haul Road Alaska
Western Arctic National Parklands
National Park Service
Jesse Ford, Ph.D.,Linda Hasselbach, M.S.,May 2001,NPS/AR/NRTR-2001/38''
http://www.mveirb.nt.ca/upload/project_document/1192211966_Heavy%20Metals%20in%20Mosses%20and%20Soil%20report.pdf
</ref>

The 2001 NPS study does not address, nor compare, overall pollution or water pollution at Red Dog to pollution elsewhere. The 2001 NPS study does not conclude that the Red Dog area is more polluted than the worst-polluted areas of Central and Eastern Europe or western Russia, although it is often misread to mean this. The statement quoted above regards only the moss samples collected in 2001 along the industrial Red Dog haul road compared to the samples collected for the Nordic moss
monitoring program: samples which are deliberately collected far from urban and industrial areas. The Nordic moss monitoring program follows a protocol that demands that samples be collected at least 300 meters from a road and that samples be collected in non-urban areas. In addition, samples for the study at Red Dog included the dust on the moss, while the Nordic moss monitoring program moss samples were shaken to remove dust.<ref>Rühling Å and Steinnes E. 1998. Atmospheric heavy metal deposition in Europe 1995-
1996. NORD 98:15. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen</ref> There are hundreds of sites in Central and Eastern Europe and western Russia that are incomparably more polluted than the Red Dog area, e.g., Dzerzinsk and Norilsk in Russia,<ref>http://www.francnord.ca/archives1/Norilsk.htm</ref>Chernobyl in Ukraine, and Baia Mare in Romania
<ref>''Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Vol. 254, No. 1 (2002) 109–115
Atmospheric deposition of heavy metals around the lead and copper-zinc
smelters in Baia Mare, Romania, studied by the moss biomonitoring technique,
neutron activation analysis and flame atomic absorption spectrometry
O. A. Culicov,1 M. V. Frontasyeva,1* E. Steinnes,2 O. S. Okina,3 Zs. Santa,4 R. Todoran4''http://www.geo.edu.ro/sgr/mod/downloads/PDF/Culicov-JRNCh-2002.pdf</ref><ref>http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N12252332.htm</ref>

The 2001 NPS study also collected and analyzed soil samples at the moss-collection sites and found none with elevated levels of lead and cadmium. Other studies indicate that the concentrations of heavy metals detected in water, soil, caribou, fish, and berry samples collected from the Red Dog mine area do not pose a public health hazard.<ref>http://www.epi.hss.state.ak.us/pubs/reddogmine/RDM_ACAT_%20071904.pdf
</ref>

It is well understood and generally agreed that years of operation of open-top haul trucks (one every 15 minutes) carrying lead-zinc concentrate resulted in lead and cadmium-bearing dust contamination alongside the haul road. Fortunately this poor practice has not resulted in a threat to human safety. The entire concentrate-haulage system has been improved,
including tight-fitting lids on the trucks and enclosure of conveyer belts at the port site.


==Transportation==
==Transportation==

Revision as of 19:42, 15 February 2008

Red Dog mine
CountryUnited States
StateAlaska
BoroughNorthwest Arctic
Time zoneUTC-9 (Alaska (AKST))
 • Summer (DST)UTC-8 (AKDT)
Area code907

The Red Dog mine is a zinc and lead mine located in a remote region of the Arctic, within the boundaries of the Red Dog Mine census-designated place in the Northwest Arctic Borough of the U.S. state of Alaska.

The mine is the world's largest producer of zinc and has the world's largest zinc reserves.[1] Red Dog accounts for 10% of the world's zinc production.[2]. In 2006 the mine produced 557,500 M/T[convert: unknown unit] of zinc, 123,500 M/T[convert: unknown unit] of lead, and 75 M/T[convert: unknown unit] of silver, for a total metal value of over one billion dollars. [3] At the end of 2006 the mine had reserves of 12,022,500 M/T[convert: unknown unit] of zinc and 3,160,200 M/T[convert: unknown unit] of lead, as well as significant additional zinc and lead in the less well-measured resource category [4]

Red Dog is located on land owned by the NANA Regional Corporation and is operated by the commercial mining company Teck Cominco in partnership with NANA.[5] Ore concentrate taken from the mine is trucked westward to a shipping facility on the Chukchi Sea and stored there until the shipping season.

The mine, which produces from an open pit, is expected to exhaust its currently-permitted ore in 2012. Teck Cominco has applied for permits to expand mining into the Aqqaluk orebody, immediately adjacent to the current pit, containing an additional 56 million metric tonnes (62 million short tons) of lead and zinc ore. The expansion would keep the mine operating until 2031.[6]

History

In the mid-1950s, pilots and geologists noted mineral staining in the region. In 1968 a U.S. Geological Survey geologist sampled rocks and stream sediments in the area, including samples from the future site of the Red Dog mine, and named Red Dog Creek after the red dog of local pilot Bob Baker, a frequent flier in the area (Tailleur; USGS Open File 70-319).[7] In the mid and late 1970s, interest in the area from major mining companies and NANA intensified. In 1980 the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) became law and NANA officially selected the land underlying the deposits. Drill exploration of the deposits began in 1980, by Cominco American. In 1982 NANA and Cominco American (a mining company that had staked the land, and later became Teck Cominco) signed an agreement to develop the deposit. In 1986 the State of Alaska agreed to fund and take ownership of a road (DeLong Mts. Transportation System) from Red Dog to the coast, and a shallow-water port site. Also in 1986, residents of Kotzebue and 10 other area villages vote to form the Northwest Arctic Borough, to be economically based on taxing the Red Dog mine. Construction of the road, port site, and mine began in July 1987. Mine operations commenced in December 1989.[8]

Economics

Under the terms of the Teck Cominco/NANA agreement, NANA received royalties of 4.5% until the capital costs of the mine were recovered, which occurred in late 2007. At this point, the royalty due to NANA increased to 25%, and will increase by an additional 5% every year, to a maximum of 50%. Under the terms of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971 (ANSCA), which created NANA and the other native corporations in Alaska, NANA must share approximately half of its profits from natural resources with the other twelve regional native corporations. If the mine remains profitable at the current level, this will mean a distribution of several hundred million dollars a year of mine profits to the regional native corporations.[9][10]

Geology

Red Dog is an example of a sedimentary exhalative deposit, with the zinc-lead ore considered to have been deposited on the sea floor as a strata of sulphide sediment.[11] Zinc, lead, silver, and barium were deposited in black muds and shales on or beneath the seafloor, in a deep quiet ocean basin, some 338 million years ago in the Mississippian period.[12]

These metals were precipitated, by chemical and/or biological agents, from a fluid that probably percolated through a huge mass (hundreds of square kilometers) of sediments, before emerging on/in the seafloor to form the Red Dog deposits. The nature of the fluid caused it to absorb and concentrate the trace amounts of zinc and lead contained in the rocks the fluid passed through.

One model holds that very saline brines formed in a restricted ocean basin within a hundred kilometers of the site of the Red Dog deposits. The brine fluid infiltrated the subsurface and was tectonically pumped through the rock mass, becoming enriched in metals as it stripped those metals from the rocks it passed through. The fluid traveled several kilometers below the earths surface. The fluid eventually reemerged through fault systems focused on the location of the Red Dog deposits, in a manner somewhat similar to the process surrounding black smokers.[13]

Long after the formation of the Red Dog deposits, the tectonic activities that built the Brooks Range deformed and thrust faulted the sedimentary strata that host the deposits, and the deposits themselves. Subsequent uplift and erosion exposed parts of the deposits at today's earth surface.[14]

Reserves and resources

Ore bodies and contained zinc at Red Dog consist of;

  • Main pit ore body with 19.5 M/T[convert: unknown unit] of ore containing 20.5% zinc. The figures represent the orebody before mining began in 1989. This is the currently permitted area of active mining, which is expected to be mined out by 2012. The ultimate size of this pit will be 5,200 ft by 3,000 ft by 400 ft (~1,585 m x 915 m x 122 m) deep.
  • Aqqaluk ore body with 55.7 M/T[convert: unknown unit] at 16% zinc. This is adjacent to the Main pit. It is well understood geologically and metallurgically. A Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement is expected to be produced in 2008 as part of the process of permitting the development of this ore body. Most of the waste rock from this operation is expected to be placed in the depleted Main pit.
  • Qanaiyaq ore body with 4.7 M/T[convert: unknown unit] at 23.7% zinc. Also an open-pit target, studies of the ore characteristics of Qanaiyaq continue.
  • The Paalaaq ore body with 13 M/T[convert: unknown unit] at 15% zinc and the Anarraaq ore body with 17.2 M/T[convert: unknown unit] at 15% zinc are both deep underground and will be accessed by tunnels and shafts, if they are eventually mined.[15][16]

Geography

Red Dog mine is located at 68°4′19″N 162°52′34″W / 68.07194°N 162.87611°W / 68.07194; -162.87611 (68.071989, -162.876044).Template:GR It is in the DeLong Mountains in the remote western Brooks Range about 90 miles (144 km) north of Kotzebue and 55 miles (88 km) from the Chukchi Sea.

Regional

The mine lies within the Northwest Arctic Borough, the boundaries of which are exactly coincident with the boundaries of the NANA Regional Corporation. The borough, which is approximately the size of Indiana, has only 11 communities and a population of only 7,208 people, 84% of which are native or part native, and 40% of which report speaking Eskimo at home. No roads connect the communities. The nearest permanent settlements to the mine, roughly 60 miles (100 km) west and 50 miles (80 km) south respectively, are the villages of Kivalina, population 377, and Noatak, population 428, at the 2000 census.Template:GR

Although native populations have historically used areas around the mine and port for seasonal food-gathering there are no permanent residents at the mine or port site. The workforce consists of about 460 employees and contractors, of which somewhat more than half will be on-site at any given time. All staff work on a rotation, most on either a 4 weeks on/2 weeks off or 2 week on/1 week off schedule. At the mine, everybody stays in the single large housing unit, tucked in among the process buildings near the edge of the open pit. A small portion of the work force stays at the port site. NANA shareholders comprise 56% of the mine's workforce.[17]

The Red Dog mine provides over a quarter of the borough's wage and salary payroll. While many of the borough's residents benefit from the mine and associated economic activities, virtually all of the borough's residents rely on subsistence activities which are dependent on a healthy environment.[18]

Environmental Concerns

On June 13, 2007 the State of Alaska removed two creeks (Red Dog Creek and Ikalukrok Creek) near the Red Dog mine in Northwest Alaska from the most-polluted waters list with EPA's approval.[19] The mine discharges treated water into Red Dog Creek, a tributary of Ikalukrok Creek. Pre-mining studies on Red Dog Creek revealed naturally high concentrations of cadmium, lead, zinc, aluminum, and other metals. Before mining began, aquatic life uses were not present in the main stem of Red Dog Creek because of the natural toxic concentrations and low Ph. After mining began, year-round release of treated mine wastewater allowed a population of Arctic Grayling to establish themselves in Red Dog Creek. That fish population is now protected by regulations.[20]

Toxic Waste releases

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),[21] Red Dog mine releases more toxic waste into the environment than any other operation in the United States. As the EPA notes, "No conclusions on the potential risks can be made based solely on this information."

More than 99% of the reported toxic waste from Red Dog consists of unprocessed rock fragments, i.e., waste rock. This waste rock is simply moved to access the underlying zinc ore. The waste rock contains relatively high concentrations of metals (1 to 2%). Leaching of these metals into the environment is a valid concern. The waste rock piles are contained and all runoff water is monitored and treated to water quality standards.[22]

Heavy metals (lead and cadmium) in mosses adjacent to the haul road

A 2001 study for the National Park Service (NPS) reports in its Executive Summary that, "Concentrations of Cd and Pb...exceed medians (and in most cases maxima) from all 28 countries in the Nordic moss monitoring program, including many of the most polluted countries in Central and Eastern Europe and all areas of western Russia."[23]

The 2001 NPS study does not address, nor compare, overall pollution or water pollution at Red Dog to pollution elsewhere. The 2001 NPS study does not conclude that the Red Dog area is more polluted than the worst-polluted areas of Central and Eastern Europe or western Russia, although it is often misread to mean this. The statement quoted above regards only the moss samples collected in 2001 along the industrial Red Dog haul road compared to the samples collected for the Nordic moss monitoring program: samples which are deliberately collected far from urban and industrial areas. The Nordic moss monitoring program follows a protocol that demands that samples be collected at least 300 meters from a road and that samples be collected in non-urban areas. In addition, samples for the study at Red Dog included the dust on the moss, while the Nordic moss monitoring program moss samples were shaken to remove dust.[24] There are hundreds of sites in Central and Eastern Europe and western Russia that are incomparably more polluted than the Red Dog area, e.g., Dzerzinsk and Norilsk in Russia,[25]Chernobyl in Ukraine, and Baia Mare in Romania [26][27]

The 2001 NPS study also collected and analyzed soil samples at the moss-collection sites and found none with elevated levels of lead and cadmium. Other studies indicate that the concentrations of heavy metals detected in water, soil, caribou, fish, and berry samples collected from the Red Dog mine area do not pose a public health hazard.[28]

It is well understood and generally agreed that years of operation of open-top haul trucks (one every 15 minutes) carrying lead-zinc concentrate resulted in lead and cadmium-bearing dust contamination alongside the haul road. Fortunately this poor practice has not resulted in a threat to human safety. The entire concentrate-haulage system has been improved, including tight-fitting lids on the trucks and enclosure of conveyer belts at the port site.

Transportation

A 52-mile (84 km) long haul road connects the mine to the mine's port site on the Chukchi Sea. The mine and port site are accessible only by air, except during the 100-day shipping season. Mine workers from remote villages in the region are ferried to the mine on small aircraft. Alaska Airlines is contracted by the mine to fly other mine workers out of Anchorage. Until 2007, gravel-strip capable Boeing 737-200 Combi aircraft were used. These ships have a cargo door in the front part of the aircraft and a separate rear passenger cabin. In 2005 the runway was paved, in anticipation of newer Boeing 737-400 Combi aircraft which are not equipped to land on gravel.[29][30]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Plant Operation News: North America". MEI Online. September 12, 2002.
  2. ^ The Giant Red Dog Massive Sulfide Deposit. Dr. David Leach. Pesquisador do USGS e Conferencista da Society of Economic Geologists
  3. ^ D.J. Szumigala, Alaska, Mining Engineering, May 2007, p.66.
  4. ^ Teck Cominco, Annual Report 2006
  5. ^ Zinc Mining – Red Dog Mine. Teck Cominco Ltd.
  6. ^ Environmental Protection Agency pulls approval of Red Dog water permit, Mining Engineering, Nov. 2007, p.16.
  7. ^ Tailleur; USGS Open File 70-319
  8. ^ Alaska Resource Data File, USGS Open File 00-23, p.2.
  9. ^ http://www.alaskajournal.com/stories/090907/foc_20070909003.shtmlwebpage, Red Dog mine tightens belt, produces record profit, Alaska Journal of Commerce, 9 Sept, 2007
  10. ^ http://www.adn.com/money/industries/native_corporations/story/9480170p-9391345c.htmlNatives in for big Royalty Boost as mine reaches Profitability; Anchorage Daily News; 26 Nov 2007
  11. ^ "Lava Lamp-Like Process Caused World's Largest Zinc Deposit". Johns Hopkins University. April 28, 2005.
  12. ^ LRombach and Layer;Economic Geology;Nov 2004;v.99;no.7;p.1307-1322.
  13. ^ Leach, et.al.;Economic Geology;Nov 2004;v.99;no.7;p.1449-1480.
  14. ^ http://econgeol.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/99/7/1415Structure of the Red Dog District, WesternBrooks Range Alaska; DeVera, J., etal; Economic Geology; Nov 2004, v.9; n.7; p.1451-1434
  15. ^ Alaska Resource Data File,USGS Open File 00-23,p.2.
  16. ^ [1]Alaska Journal of Commerce, 4 Nov, 2007
  17. ^ (Operation and Site Performance 2006 Red Dog Mine, Teck Cominco Limited)
  18. ^ Alaska Economic Trends, Alaska Department of Labor, Vol. 19, Num. 1, January 1999.
  19. ^ "Kenai River and Big Lake designated heavily polluted". Anchorage Daily News. June 14, 2007.
  20. ^ "Red Dog Mine UAA". EPA. August 8, 2007.
  21. ^ Pollution Rankings by Facility. Scorecard.org
  22. ^ "Mining and the Environment:Mines in Alaska face Challenges Due to Environmental Regulations". Alaska Business Monthly. March 1, 2005.
  23. ^ Heavy Metals in Mosses and Soils on Six Transects Along the Red Dog Mine Haul Road Alaska Western Arctic National Parklands National Park Service Jesse Ford, Ph.D.,Linda Hasselbach, M.S.,May 2001,NPS/AR/NRTR-2001/38 http://www.mveirb.nt.ca/upload/project_document/1192211966_Heavy%20Metals%20in%20Mosses%20and%20Soil%20report.pdf
  24. ^ Rühling Å and Steinnes E. 1998. Atmospheric heavy metal deposition in Europe 1995- 1996. NORD 98:15. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen
  25. ^ http://www.francnord.ca/archives1/Norilsk.htm
  26. ^ Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Vol. 254, No. 1 (2002) 109–115 Atmospheric deposition of heavy metals around the lead and copper-zinc smelters in Baia Mare, Romania, studied by the moss biomonitoring technique, neutron activation analysis and flame atomic absorption spectrometry O. A. Culicov,1 M. V. Frontasyeva,1* E. Steinnes,2 O. S. Okina,3 Zs. Santa,4 R. Todoran4http://www.geo.edu.ro/sgr/mod/downloads/PDF/Culicov-JRNCh-2002.pdf
  27. ^ http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N12252332.htm
  28. ^ http://www.epi.hss.state.ak.us/pubs/reddogmine/RDM_ACAT_%20071904.pdf
  29. ^ "Arctic Eagles Bid Mud Hens Farewell at Alaska Airlines". Wall Street Journal. April 13, 2007. p. 1.
  30. ^ Red Dog - Airport Fact Sheet. FareCompare.com

Template:Geolinks-US-streetscale