Jump to content

Project Chanology: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Piepie (talk | contribs)
CoS litigation/YouTube reposting
Hannabee (talk | contribs)
Truth added
Line 15: Line 15:


== Criticism ==
== Criticism ==
[[Andreas Heldal-Lund]], founder of the Scientology-critical website and [[non-profit organization]], [[Operation Clambake]], released a statement criticizing the digital assault against Scientology.<ref>George-Cosh, ''[[National Post]]'', [[January 25]], [[2008]].</ref> Heldal-Lund commented "People should be able to have easy access to both sides and make up their own opinions. Freedom of speech means we need to allow all to speak -- including those we strongly disagree with."<ref>George-Cosh, ''[[National Post]]'', [[January 25]], [[2008]].</ref>
Though it is unclear why anyone would oppose something so inherently incredible as this, [[Andreas Heldal-Lund]], founder of the Scientology-critical website and [[non-profit organization]], [[Operation Clambake]], released a statement criticizing the digital assault against Scientology.<ref>George-Cosh, ''[[National Post]]'', [[January 25]], [[2008]].</ref> Heldal-Lund commented "People should be able to have easy access to both sides and make up their own opinions. Freedom of speech means we need to allow all to speak -- including those we strongly disagree with."<ref>George-Cosh, ''[[National Post]]'', [[January 25]], [[2008]].</ref>


The church briefly responded to the attacks claiming they where misguided. In a [[January 25]], [[2008]] statement made to ''[[News.com.au]]'' A spokesman for the Church of Scientology said "These types of people have got some wrong information about us."<ref>Schliebs, ''[[News.com.au]]'', [[January 25]], [[2008]].</ref>
The church briefly responded to the attacks claiming they where misguided. In a [[January 25]], [[2008]] statement made to ''[[News.com.au]]'' A spokesman for the Church of Scientology said "These types of people have got some wrong information about us."<ref>Schliebs, ''[[News.com.au]]'', [[January 25]], [[2008]].</ref>

Revision as of 00:03, 26 January 2008

"Project Chanology" is the name given to a digital assault on the controversial Church of Scientology by "Anonymous" -a loose confederation of online pranksters and Internet trolls.

Coinciding with the publication of Tom Cruise: An Unauthorized Biography, material from an exclusive Scientology interview with Tom Cruise was leaked onto YouTube on January 16, 2008. According to The Daily Telegraph the video features "a manic-looking Cruise" who "gushes" about his appreciation of Scientology.[1] During the video, music from Cruise's Mission Impossible films plays in the background, and Cruise makes claims including saying that Scientologists are the only people who can help at the scene of a car accident, and that Scientologists are the authority on getting addicts off drugs.[2][3] The Church of Scientology stated that the video was produced to be shown to members of Scientology, and that the leaked version was a "pirated and edited" version taken from a three-hour event.[4][5]

Formation

Denizens of various Internet forums formulated "Project Chanology" after the Church of Scientology issued a copyright violation claim against the video, and successfully coerced YouTube into removing it from their site under threat of litigation.[6] The effort has also been referred to by group members as "Operation Chanology".[7] Members of the group refer to each other and to the group as a whole as "Anonymous", and frequent the forums, boards and IRC channels of websites such as 4chan, 711chan.org and partyvan.info.[8][9][10][11] As of January 25, 2008, the web site Gawker.com was still hosting a copy of the Tom Cruise video (despite CoS legal threats), and other sites have posted the entire video.[12][13] Various forms of the video have since been re-posted on YouTube including a full-length version of the piece [14]and various parodies.

Attack

Calling the action by the Church of Scientology a form of Internet censorship, a series of DDoS attacks against Scientology websites, prank calls, and black faxes to Scientology centers were organized.[15][16] They call for this to continue until they have "total and complete destruction of the present form of the Church of Scientology".[17] Members of "Anonymous" were directed via a web site set up for the group to download denial of service software in order to take down the website Scientology.org.[18] The group was successful in taking down a Scientology website on January 18, 2008.[19] Local Church of Scientology chapter sites were also affected.[20] The "Project Chanology" website is set up in the form of a collaborative wiki.[21] On January 21, 2008, a statement was released in the form of a press release by "Anonymous" declaring a "War on Scientology" against both the Church of Scientology and the Religious Technology Center.[22] Speaking to Sky News, the chief executive of Internet security firm 7safe.com said that it was possible that the group used a denial-of-service attack, in order to take down the Scientology website.[23]

On January 21, 2008 "Anonymous" posted a video to YouTube which said "We shall proceed to expel you from the Internet and systematically dismantle the church of scientology in its present form ... We are anonymous. We are legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us."[24] The Tom Cruise video is specifically named at the beginning of the "Anonymous" YouTube posting, and is referred to as a "propaganda video".[25][26] As of January 25, 2008 the video had been watched 600,000 times.[27] Anonymous escalated their attacks against Scientology on January 25, 2008.[28] In a different video posted to YouTube, Anonymous speaks to the news organizations covering the conflict, and criticizes the media's reporting of the incident.[29]

Criticism

Though it is unclear why anyone would oppose something so inherently incredible as this, Andreas Heldal-Lund, founder of the Scientology-critical website and non-profit organization, Operation Clambake, released a statement criticizing the digital assault against Scientology.[30] Heldal-Lund commented "People should be able to have easy access to both sides and make up their own opinions. Freedom of speech means we need to allow all to speak -- including those we strongly disagree with."[31]

The church briefly responded to the attacks claiming they where misguided. In a January 25, 2008 statement made to News.com.au A spokesman for the Church of Scientology said "These types of people have got some wrong information about us."[32]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ The Daily Telegraph staff, AFP, The Daily Telegraph, January 16, 2008.
  2. ^ Warne, APC Magazine, January 24, 2008.
  3. ^ KNBC, January 24, 2008.
  4. ^ KNBC, January 24, 2008.
  5. ^ (January 23, 2008). "Report: Church of Scientology Slams German Tabloid for Publishing Comments Comparing Tom Cruise to Nazi Minister". FoxNews. Retrieved on January 26, 2008.
  6. ^ Vamosi, CNET News, January 24, 2008
  7. ^ Landers, Baltimore City Paper, January 25, 2008.
  8. ^ George-Cosh, David (January 25, 2008). "Online group declares war on Scientology. National Post. Retrieved on January 26, 2008.
  9. ^ Singel, Wired, January 23, 2008.
  10. ^ Feran, The Plain Dealer, January 24, 2008.
  11. ^ Chan Enterprises, Press Release, January 21, 2008.
  12. ^ Landers, Baltimore City Paper, January 25, 2008.
  13. ^ Vamosi, CNET News, January 24, 2008.
  14. ^ "[1]. YouTube. Retrieved on January 26, 2008.
  15. ^ Vamosi, CNET News, January 24, 2008
  16. ^ Vamosi, CNET News, January 24, 2008.
  17. ^ Dingman, National Post, January 24, 2008.
  18. ^ KNBC, January 24, 2008.
  19. ^ Richards, FOX News, January 25, 2008.
  20. ^ Vamosi, CNET News, January 24, 2008.
  21. ^ Singel, Wired, January 23, 2008.
  22. ^ Chan Enterprises, Press Release, January 21, 2008.
  23. ^ Schliebs, News.com.au, January 25, 2008.
  24. ^ Dodd, Xinhua News Agency, January 25, 2008.
  25. ^ United Press International, January 25, 2008.
  26. ^ Warne, APC Magazine, January 24, 2008.
  27. ^ Richards, FOX News, January 25, 2008.
  28. ^ Vamosi, CNET News, January 25, 2008.
  29. ^ Vamosi, CNET News, January 25, 2008.
  30. ^ George-Cosh, National Post, January 25, 2008.
  31. ^ George-Cosh, National Post, January 25, 2008.
  32. ^ Schliebs, News.com.au, January 25, 2008.

References

Template:Wikinewshas