Jump to content

Poshlost

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Poshlust)

Poshlost or poshlost' (Russian: по́шлость, IPA: [ˈpoʂləsʲtʲ]) is a Russian word for a particular negative human character trait or man-made thing or idea. It has been cited as an example of a so-called untranslatable word, as there is no single exact one-word English equivalent. The major flavors of the word are in the wide range: "amorality", "vulgarity", "banality", "tastelessness".[1] It carries much cultural baggage in Russia and has been discussed at length by various writers.

It is derived from the adjective póšlyj (пошлый).

Description

[edit]

It has been defined as "petty evil or self-satisfied vulgarity",[2] while Svetlana Boym[3] defines it briefly as "obscenity and bad taste".

Boym goes on to describe it at more length:[4]

Poshlost' is the Russian version of banality, with a characteristic national flavoring of metaphysics and high morality, and a peculiar conjunction of the sexual and the spiritual. This one word encompasses triviality, vulgarity, sexual promiscuity, and a lack of spirituality. The war against poshlost' was a cultural obsession of the Russian and Soviet intelligentsia from the 1860s to 1960s.

In his novels, Turgenev "tried to develop a heroic figure who could, with the verve and abandon of a Don Quixote, grapple with the problems of Russian society, who could once and for all overcome 'poshlost', the complacent mediocrity and moral degeneration of his environment".[5] Dostoyevsky applied the word to the Devil; Solzhenitsyn, to Western-influenced young people.[4]

D. S. Mirsky was an early user of the word in English in writing about Gogol; he defined it as "'self-satisfied inferiority,' moral and spiritual".[6] Vladimir Nabokov made it more widely known in his book on Gogol, where he romanized it as "poshlust" (punningly: "posh" + "lust"). Poshlust, Nabokov explained, "is not only the obviously trashy but mainly the falsely important, the falsely beautiful, the falsely clever, the falsely attractive. A list of literary characters personifying poshlust will include... Polonius and the royal pair in Hamlet, Rodolphe and Homais from Madame Bovary, Laevsky in Chekhov's 'The Duel', Joyce's Marion [Molly] Bloom, young Bloch in Search of Lost Time, Maupassant's 'Bel Ami', Anna Karenina's husband, and Berg in War and Peace".[7] Nabokov also listed:[8]

Corny trash, vulgar clichés, Philistinism in all its phases, imitations of imitations, bogus profundities, crude, moronic and dishonest pseudo-literature—these are obvious examples. Now, if we want to pin down poshlost in contemporary writing we must look for it in Freudian symbolism, moth-eaten mythologies, social comment, humanistic messages, political allegories, overconcern with class or race, and the journalistic generalities we all know.

Azar Nafisi mentions it and quotes the "falsely" definition in Reading Lolita in Tehran.[9][clarification needed]

Nabokov often targeted poshlost in his own work; the Alexandrov definition above of "petty evil or self-satisfied vulgarity" refers to the character of M'sieur Pierre in Nabokov's Invitation to a Beheading.

Another literary treatment is Fyodor Sologub's novel The Petty Demon. It tells the story of a provincial schoolteacher, Peredonov, notable for his complete lack of redeeming human qualities. James H. Billington[10] said of it:

The book puts on display a Freudian treasure chest of perversions with subtlety and credibility. The name of the novel's hero, Peredonov, became a symbol of calculating concupiscence for an entire generation... [Peredonov] seeks not the ideal world but the world of petty venality and sensualism, poshlost'. He torments his students, derives erotic satisfaction from watching them kneel to pray, and systematically befouls his apartment before leaving it as part of his generalized spite against the universe.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Mikheev, Alexey (29 May 2014). "A question of taste: The untranslatable word 'poshlost'". Russia Beyond The Headlines. Retrieved 12 February 2016.
  2. ^ Alexandrov 1991, p. 106.
  3. ^ Boym 2001, p. 279.
  4. ^ a b Boym 1994, p. 41.
  5. ^ Lindstrom 1966, p. 149.
  6. ^ Mirsky 1927, p. 158.
  7. ^ Nabokov 1944, p. 70. Brackets added.
  8. ^ Nabokov 1973.
  9. ^ "Books", The Guardian (review), UK.
  10. ^ Billington 1966, p. 494.

Bibliography

[edit]