Pharmacological Calvinism: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m WP:CHECKWIKI error fix for #61. Punctuation goes before References. Do general fixes if a problem exists. - using AWB (8853) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<br /><br /> |
|||
'''Pharmacological Calvinism''' is a term describing the disapproving or condemning attitude of some [[People of the United States|Americans]] to the use of [[psychiatric medication]]. It reflects a perceived general distrust of [[drug]] use for purposes of restoring or attaining [[pleasure]] or [[happiness]]. The term was first used in 1972<ref>Klerman, G.L. (1972), "Psychotropic hedonism vs. pharmacological Calvinism", ''[[Hastings Cent Rep.]]'' Sep;2(4):1-3.</ref> by the late [[psychiatrist]] [[Gerald L.Klerman]] (1929-1992<ref>Lambert, Bruce (1992),[http://www.nytimes.com/1992/04/05/nyregion/gerald-l-klerman-63-an-expert-on-depression-and-schizophrenia.html?pagewanted=1 “Gerald L. Klerman, 63, an Expert On Depression and Schizophrenia”] (Obit), ''[[The New York Times]]'' (April 5).</ref>). According to this view, the only legitimate use of drugs is for the purpose of [[cure|curing]] or [[therapy|treating]] [[illness]] and [[disease]]. |
|||
<div style="text-align: center"><font style="color: #e5e4e2; background: #315b84; font-family: sans-serif; padding: .1em .25em .75em .25em; font-size: 5em;">G</font> <font style="color: #e5e4e2; background: #315b84; font-family: sans-serif; padding: .1em .25em .75em .25em; font-size: 5em;">N</font> <font style="color: #e5e4e2; background: #315b84; font-family: sans-serif; padding: .1em .25em .75em .25em; font-size: 5em;">A</font> <font style="color: #e5e4e2; background: #315b84; font-family: sans-serif; padding: .1em .25em .75em .25em; font-size: 5em;">A</font><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /></div> |
|||
[[Peter D. Kramer]] defined the concept of [[pharmacology|pharmacological]] Calvinism as “a general distrust of drugs used for non-therapeutic purposes and a conviction that if a drug makes you feel good it must be morally bad”.<ref>Kramer, Peter (1993), ''Listening to Prozac'', [[New York, NY]]: [[Viking Press|Viking]]</ref> |
|||
Those advocating this outlook may see [[pain]] and suffering as vital aspects of the [[human condition]] and take the view that to absolve people of these experiences would remove an essential aspect of their humanity. Thus, this use of [[pharmaceutical]]s is seen by some as dangerously [[dehumanizing]]. Klerman wrote at a time when there was growing concern about American drug use, both legal ([[tranquilizer]]s) and illegal ([[cannabis]], [[LSD]], etc.) The [[stoicism|stoic]] attitude that strong people tough it out, while weak, self-indulgent people give in and seek an artificial, chemical release from life’s travails, persists among many Americans today. This manifests itself in the current controversies surrounding the widespread use of [[antidepressant]]s (especially [[SSRI]]s) and other [[cognitive enhancer]]s, such as ''[[Ritalin]]'' for [[attention deficit disorder]]. |
|||
It has been pointed out that, strictly speaking, Klerman misrepresents [[Calvinism|Calvinist theology]] in the use of this term.<ref>[[Louis Menand|Menand, Louis]] (2010) |
|||
[http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2010/03/01/100301crat_atlarge_menand "Head Case"], ''[[The New Yorker]]''; March 1 issue.</ref> |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
Revision as of 21:37, 16 April 2013
G N A A
References