Jump to content

Lady Jane Grey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Nine Days Queen)
"Jane Grey" redirects here. For other uses, see Jane Grey (disambiguation).

Lady Jane Grey
The Streatham portrait, believed to be based on a contemporary woodcut
Queen of England and Ireland
(more...)
(disputed)
Reign10 July 1553 – 19 July 1553[1]
PredecessorEdward VI
SuccessorMary I
Born1536 or 1537
Possibly London or Bradgate Park, Leicestershire, England
Died12 February 1554 (aged 16 or 17)[2][3][4][5]
Tower of London, London, England
Burial
Church of St Peter ad Vincula, Tower of London
Spouse
​
​
(m. 1553; died 1554)​
HouseGrey
FatherHenry Grey, 1st Duke of Suffolk
MotherLady Frances Brandon
ReligionProtestantism
SignatureLady Jane Grey's signature

Lady Jane Grey (1536/7 – 12 February 1554), also known as Lady Jane Dudley after her marriage[3] and as the "Nine Days' Queen",[6] was an English noblewoman who claimed the throne of England and Ireland from 10 to 19 July 1553.

Jane was the great-granddaughter of Henry VII, through his youngest daughter, Mary, a grand-niece of Henry VIII, and cousin to Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I. Under the will of Henry VIII, Jane was in line to the throne after her cousins. She had a humanist education and a reputation as one of the most learned young women of her day.[7] In May 1553, she was married to Lord Guildford Dudley, a younger son of Edward VI's chief minister, John Dudley, Duke of Northumberland. In June 1553 the dying Edward VI wrote his will, nominating Jane and her male heirs as successors to the Crown, in part because his half-sister Mary was Catholic whilst Jane was a committed Protestant and would support the reformed Church of England, whose foundation Edward laid. The will removed his half-sisters, Mary and Elizabeth, from the line of succession on account of their illegitimacy, subverting their lawful claims under the Third Succession Act. Through Northumberland, Edward's letters patent in favour of Jane were signed by the entire privy council, bishops, and other notables.

After Edward's death, Jane was proclaimed queen on 10 July 1553 and awaited coronation in the Tower of London. Support for Mary grew rapidly and most of Jane's supporters abandoned her. The Privy Council of England suddenly changed sides and proclaimed Mary as queen on 19 July 1553, deposing Jane. Her primary supporter, her father-in-law, the Duke of Northumberland, was accused of treason and executed less than a month later. Jane was held prisoner in the Tower and in November 1553 was also convicted of treason, which carried a sentence of death.

Mary initially spared her life, but Jane soon became viewed as a threat to the Crown when her father, Henry Grey, 1st Duke of Suffolk, became involved with Wyatt's rebellion against Queen Mary's intention to marry Philip of Spain. Jane and her husband were executed on 12 February 1554. At the time of her execution, Jane was either 16 or 17 years old.

Early life and education

[edit]
Lady Frances Brandon and Henry Grey, Duke of Suffolk, Jane's parents
Lady Margaret Wotton, Lady Mary Tudor and Charles Brandon, 1st Duke of Suffolk, Jane's paternal and maternal grandparents

Lady Jane Grey was the eldest daughter of Henry Grey, 1st Duke of Suffolk, and his wife, Frances Brandon. The traditional view is that she was born at Bradgate Park in Leicestershire in October 1537, but more recent research indicates that she was born somewhat earlier, possibly in London, sometime before May 1537[8][9] or between May 1536 and February 1537.[10] This would coincide with the fact that she was noted as being in her seventeenth year at the time of her execution.[9][11] Frances was the eldest daughter of Henry VIII's younger sister, Mary. Jane had two younger sisters: Lady Katherine and Lady Mary. Through their mother the three sisters were great-granddaughters of Henry VII; great-nieces of Henry VIII; and first cousins once removed of the future Edward VI, Mary I and Elizabeth I.

Jane received a humanist education from John Aylmer, speaking Latin and Greek from an early age, also studying Hebrew with Aylmer and Italian with Michelangelo Florio.[12] She was particularly fond, throughout her life, of writing letters in Latin and Greek.[13] Through the influence of her father and her tutors, she became a committed Protestant and also corresponded with the Zürich reformer Heinrich Bullinger.[14]

She preferred academic studies to activities such as hunting parties[15] and allegedly regarded her strict upbringing, which was typical of the time,[16] as harsh. To the visiting scholar Roger Ascham, who found her reading Plato, she is said to have complained:

For when I am in the presence either of father or mother, whether I speak, keep silence, sit, stand or go, eat, drink, be merry or sad, be sewing, playing, dancing, or doing anything else, I must do it as it were in such weight, measure and number, even so perfectly as God made the world; or else I am so sharply taunted, so cruelly threatened, yea presently sometimes with pinches, nips and bobs and other ways (which I will not name for the honour I bear them) ... that I think myself in hell.[17]

Around February 1547 Jane was sent to live in the household of Edward VI's uncle, Thomas Seymour, 1st Baron Seymour of Sudeley, who soon married Henry VIII's widow, Katherine Parr. After moving there, Jane was able to receive educational opportunities available in court circles.[3] Jane lived with the couple at Sudeley Castle in Gloucestershire as an attendant to Katherine until Katherine died in childbirth in September 1548.[18][19] About eleven years old at the time, Jane was chief mourner at Katherine's funeral.[3] After Thomas Seymour's arrest for treason, Jane returned to Bradgate and continued her studies.[3]

Contracts for marriage

[edit]
17th century portrait of a lady in the collection of Audley End House, labelled as Jane Grey, copy of the original at Syon House. Based on a portrait type identified as Lady Katherine Grey or Elizabeth I, it is believed that the Syon Portrait was created by William Seymour, 2nd Duke of Somerset, with the help of his grandfather, Lady Katherine Grey's widower, who had also known Lady Jane Grey, tweaking the portrait type into a genuine resemblance of her.[20][21][22][23]
John Dudley, 1st Duke of Northumberland, Jane's father-in-law and strongman who led much of his daughter-in-law's brief reign

Lady Jane acted as chief mourner at Katherine Parr's funeral. Thomas Seymour showed continued interest in keeping her in his household, and she returned there for about two months before he was arrested at the end of 1548.[24] Seymour's brother, the Lord Protector, Edward Seymour, 1st Duke of Somerset, felt threatened by Thomas' popularity with the young King Edward. Among other things, Thomas Seymour was charged with proposing Jane as a bride for the king.[25]

In the course of Thomas Seymour's following attainder and execution, Jane's father was lucky to stay largely out of trouble. After his fourth interrogation by the King's Council, he proposed his daughter Jane as a bride for the Protector's eldest son, Lord Hertford.[26] Nothing came of this, however, and Jane was not engaged until 25 May 1553, her bridegroom being Lord Guildford Dudley, a younger son of John Dudley, 1st Duke of Northumberland.[27] The Duke, Lord President of the King's Council from late 1549, was then the most powerful man in the country.[28] On 25 May 1553, the couple were married at Durham House in a triple wedding, in which Jane's sister Katherine was matched with the heir of the Earl of Pembroke, Lord Herbert, and another Katherine, Lord Guildford's sister, with Henry Hastings, the Earl of Huntingdon's heir.[29]

Claim to the throne and accession

[edit]
See also: Third Succession Act and 1553 succession crisis

Illness and death of Edward VI, and accession of Jane to the throne

[edit]
"My devise for the Succession" by Edward VI. The draft will was the basis for the letters patent, which declared Lady Jane Grey successor to the Crown.[30] Edward's autograph shows his alteration of his text, from "L Janes heires masles" to "L Jane and her heires masles".[31] Inner Temple Library, London.

Henry VIII had three children: Mary, who was raised Roman Catholic, and Elizabeth and Edward, the last from the King's third marriage, to Jane Seymour (who died in 1537 after complications arising from the pregnancy and birth of Edward), who were raised as Protestant. Following divorces from his first two wives, Catherine of Aragon in 1533 and Anne Boleyn in 1536, Henry rewrote the Act of Succession twice, declaring his daughters Mary and Elizabeth illegitimate. Although Jane Seymour managed to reconcile Henry briefly with his daughters,[32] the monarch's formal reconciliation with them would come only in 1543, at the urging of his sixth and last wife, Catherine Parr. The princesses were reinstated in the line of succession in the Final Act of 1544, although they were still regarded as illegitimate.[33] Furthermore, this Act authorised Henry VIII to alter the succession by his will. Henry's will reinforced the succession of his three children and then declared that, should none of them leave descendants, the throne would pass to heirs of his younger sister, Mary, which included Jane. For reasons still unknown, Henry excluded his niece and Jane's mother, Lady Frances Brandon, from the succession,[34] and also bypassed the claims of the descendants of his elder sister, Margaret, who had married into the Scottish royal house and nobility.

In February 1553 Edward VI fell ill (many historians believe it was tuberculosis[35][36][37][38]). Although he briefly recovered,[39] in May he suffered a relapse again, and by early June his health had seriously deteriorated to the point that royal doctors informed Regent Dudley and other noblemen close to the young monarch that he had only a few weeks to live.[40][41] At the time, Edward's heir presumptive was his Catholic half-sister, Mary. Edward, in a draft will ("My devise for the Succession") composed earlier in 1553, had first restricted the succession to (non-existent) male descendants of Jane's mother and her daughters, before he named his Protestant cousin "Lady Jane and her heirs male" as his successors, probably in June 1553. Aware of his impending death and still with a clear conscience, Edward, guided primarily by Dudley, planned the exclusion of his older half-sister from the line of succession.[42] The king's intentions aligned closely with Dudley's fears: Dudley, who had become a symbol of the hated Reformation for Mary, reasonably believed that Mary might seek to eliminate both him and his family once she came to power.[43][44] Both the King and Protector Dudley knew of Mary's intense devotion to the Catholic faith; The Princess had half accepted some of her father's reforms,[45] but bitterly disapproved of all those made by Edward, and the fear of both Edward and Dudley is that if she came to the throne, she would reestablish Catholicism, reversing all the reforms made.[46][31][47][48] However, his advisors warned the monarch that he could not disinherit just one of his two older half-sisters: he would also have to disinherit Elizabeth, although she, like her half-brother, was also a Protestant. Instigated by Northumberland, Edward decided to disinherit both Mary and Elizabeth, thus contravening the Succession Act of 1544, and appointed Jane Grey as his heir.[49][37]

The essence of Edward's will was to give priority to the throne to the unborn sons of Lady Frances Brandon, followed by the unborn sons of her daughter Jane Grey. The choice of the descendants of Henry VII's youngest daughter was easy: Edward had no choice. He could not follow Salic law because of the paucity of men in the Tudor line: the only such man, the Scotsman Henry Stewart, Lord Darnley, barely 6 or 7 years old and son of the King's first cousin, Lady Margaret Douglas, was Catholic and therefore unacceptable to the monarch.[50] The Plantagenet men were also unacceptable: Edward Courtenay descendant of Catherine of York, great-aunt of Edward VI, not only was he Catholic, but he had also spent many years imprisoned in the Tower. Reginald Pole and his relatives were also Catholics and political emigrants.[51] Having excluded from consideration the descendants of the Plantagenets, the descendants of his aunt Margaret (the Scottish Stewarts) and his own older half-sisters Mary and Elizabeth, Edward was forced to choose from the descendants of his aunt Mary, Widow Queen of France and Duchess of Suffolk. There were no male descendants in this branch of the Tudors, and the oldest woman of childbearing age was Mary's thirty-five-year-old daughter Frances Grey. If Frances could not bear a child, Frances's eldest daughter, Jane, could. She was young, healthy, and brought up in the Protestant faith, and her other qualities were of no importance.

Edward VI personally supervised the copying of his will which was finally issued as letters patent on 21 June and signed by 102 notables, among them the whole Privy Council, peers, bishops, judges, and London aldermen.[52] Edward also announced to have his "declaration" passed in parliament in September, and the necessary writs were prepared.[37] The King died on 6 July 1553, but his death was not announced until four days later.[5] On 9 July, Jane was informed that she was now Queen. She was initially reluctant to accept the crown, although she later relented after pressure from an assembly of nobles, including her parents and her parents in-laws, while Guildford chimed in with a lovelier approach, with "prayers and caresses".[53] On 10 July she was officially proclaimed Queen of England, France and Ireland and that same day, she and her husband Guildford made their ceremonial entry into the Tower of London, where English monarchs customarily resided from the time of accession until coronation. After the young couple's arrival at the Tower, Guildford began demanding to be made King Consort.[54] Jane had a long discussion about this with Guildford, who "assented that if he were to be made king, he would be so by me, by Act of Parliament".[55] However, Jane would agree only to make him Duke of Clarence; Guildford replied that he did not want to be a duke, but the king.[55] When the Duchess of Northumberland heard of the argument, she became furious and forbade Guildford to sleep any longer with his wife. She also commanded him to leave the Tower and go home, but Jane insisted that he remain at court at her side.[56]

Mary's claim and Jane's final downfall

[edit]

Princess Mary was last seen by Edward in mid-February, but both her advisers and the imperial ambassador were keeping her informed about the state of her brother's health.[57] At the end of June, Mary was invited to visit her dying brother. However her advisers warned her that it was a plan devised by Northumberland to capture her and thus facilitate Jane's accession to the throne.[58][59] Therefore, a few days before Edward's death, the Princess left Hunsdon House, near London, and sped to her extensive estates around Kenninghall in Norfolk, where she could count on the support of her tenants.[60][61] Northumberland sent part of the Royal Navy to the Norfolk coasts to prevent their escape or the arrival of reinforcements from the Continent.[62]

Mary Tudor, who became Queen, with a coup d'état within the Privy Council, after the brief nine-day reign of Jane

To claim her right to the throne, Mary began assembling her supporters in East Anglia. Northumberland soon realised that he had made a grave mistake in failing to capture and neutralise the Princess before she fled to her estates in Norfolk.[63] Although many of those who rallied to Mary were Catholics hoping to reestablish the traditional faith and defeat Protestantism, among her supporters there were also Protestants who were dissatisfied with the governance of both Edward and Dudley,[64] and many for whom the Princess's legitimate claim to the throne overrode religious considerations.[65] On 9 July, from Kenninghall, she sent a letter saying that she was now Queen and demanded the obedience of the Council.[66][67] The letter arrived on 10 July, the same day as Jane's proclamation in London.[66] Jane's proclamation in London was greeted by the public with murmurs of discontent.[62] The council replied to Mary's letter that Jane was queen by Edward's authority and that Mary, by contrast, was illegitimate and supported only by "a few lewd, base people".[68] Dudley interpreted the letter as a threat, although at that time he had not prepared for resolute action on Mary's part since he needed at least a week to try to build up a larger force.[69] He was in a dilemma over who should lead the troops. He was the most experienced general in the Kingdom, but he did not want to leave the government in the hands of his colleagues, in some of whom he had little confidence.[70] Jane decided the issue by demanding that her father should remain with her and the Council.[71]

On the night of 10 July, during dinner, the Duchess of Suffolk, Jane's mother, and the Duchess of Northumberland broke into tears, due to the arrival of Mary's letter, as the duchesses knew that they could be left in a vulnerable position if Mary triumphed and acceded to the throne.[66]

On 12 July, Mary and her supporters gathered an army of nearly twenty thousand at Framlingham Castle, Suffolk, Duke of Norfolk's property, eventually to confront the forces led by Dudley.[72][73]

On 14 July, Northumberland was obliged to relinquish control of a nervous Council in London to pursue Mary into East Anglia.[74] That same day, Northumberland, accompanied by his sons John, Earl of Warwick, the Duke's heir apparent, and Lord Ambrose, left London and headed to Cambridge with 1,500 troops and some artillery, having reminded his colleagues of the gravity of the cause, "what chance of variance soever might grow amongst you in my absence".[70][75]

After marching to East Anglia, the Northumberland army spent a week practically without action, until on 20 July the Duke learned that the previous day the Council had declared for Mary. Supported by the gentry and nobility of East Anglia and the Thames Valley, Mary's support grew daily and, through luck, came into possession of powerful artillery from the Royal navy. Given the circumstances and the fact that the Council had changed sides, the Duke felt that launching a final attack against Mary meant fighting a hopeless campaign. The army proceeded from Cambridge to Bury St Edmunds and retreated again to Cambridge.[76] Stranded in Cambridge, Northumberland surrendered and proclaimed Mary in the Marketplace, as he had been ordered in a letter from the Council. After proclaiming Mary, the Duke raised his cap and "laughed to try to hide the tears that fell down his pain-filled cheeks."[77] Two members of the Council, the Catholics William Paget and Henry FitzAlan, 12th Earl of Arundel, rode to Framlingham to beg Mary's pardon, on behalf of the majority of the councillors, for having signed the document removing her from the succession and placing Jane Grey on the throne. A large group of townsmen and university scholars surrounded King's College to arrest the Duke, who was with his sons, lodged on the premises. In contrast to his father and his brother, Warwick resisted arrest.[78] A letter from the Council arrived that everyman could go his way, so the Duke asked to be set free, "and so continued they all night [at liberty]".[79]

At dawn on 21 July, the Duke and his sons "was booted ready to have ridden in the morning", and escape.[80] However it was too late, as that same morning Arundel arrived to once again arrest the Duke, his sons, and his entourage.[81] The prisoners returned riding side by side through London to the Tower on 25 July, the guards having difficulties protecting them against the hostile populace.[82][83][84] A pamphlet appearing shortly after Northumberland's arrest illustrated the general hatred of him: "the great devil Dudley ruleth, Duke I should have said".[85] He was now commonly thought to have poisoned King Edward while Mary "would have been as glad of her brother's life, as the ragged bear is glad of his death".[86] Dumbfounded by the turn of events, the French ambassador Antoine de Noailles wrote: "I have witnessed the most sudden change believable in men, and I believe that God alone worked it."[87] The Council switched their allegiance and proclaimed Mary queen in London, on 19 July. A majority of the councillors moved out of the Tower before switching their allegiance.[88] Becoming aware of his colleagues' change of mind, Jane's father abandoned his command of the fortress and proclaimed Mary I on nearby Tower Hill. The historical consensus assumes that this was in recognition of overwhelming support of the population for Mary. However there is no clear evidence for that outside Norfolk and Suffolk, where Northumberland had put down Kett's Rebellion, and many adherents to the Catholic faith and opponents of Northumberland lived there.[89][90] Rather, it seems the Earl of Arundel, together with William Herbert, Earl of Pembroke orchestrated a coup d'état in the Privy Council in Northumberland's absence. Arundel, one of the leaders of the Conservative faction within the Council and a staunch opponent of the reformist religious policies of both the King and Northumberland,[91] had been imprisoned twice by Dudley for having sided with the previous Protector, Somerset; but it is not clear why Pembroke participated in the coup, especially since his son and heir, Henry, had married Jane's sister, Katherine, the same day as Jane and Guildford Dudley's wedding.[92] Once the coup was consummated, the rest of the councillors, including those who were still loyal to Jane, accepted it.[93] On 19 July, the Council met at Baynard's Castle, Pembroke's property, to end the claim of Lady Jane Grey to the throne and proclaim Mary as Queen of England.[94] That same day, a few hours before Queen Mary's proclamation in London, the baptism of one of the Gentlemen Pensioners' children took place. Jane had agreed to be the godmother and wished the child's name to be Guildford.[95] The Bishop of Winchester, Stephen Gardiner, who had been imprisoned in the Tower for five years, took great offence at this fact as he heard of it.[96]

Mary I entering London triumphantly, 15 days after the Council deposed Jane Grey and proclaimed Mary the new Queen. Portrait made by Byam Shaw in 1910.

Mary rode triumphantly into London on 3 August, on a wave of popular support. She was accompanied by her half-sister Elizabeth and a procession of over 800 nobles and gentlemen.[97]

Jane is often called the Nine-Day Queen; however, if her reign is dated from the moment of Edward's death on 6 July 1553, it could be reckoned to have lasted for almost two weeks (13 days).[98] On 19 July 1553, Jane was imprisoned in the Tower's Gentleman Gaoler's apartments, and Guildford was imprisoned in the Bell Tower. There he was soon joined by his brother, Robert.[99][100] His remaining brothers were imprisoned in other towers, as was Northumberland, who was for the moment the only prominent person to go to the scaffold. Despite the Duchess of Northumberland's desperate pleas to the Queen not to execute him, nothing changed the final sentence and Dudley was beheaded on 22 August 1553.[101] Also executed that same day was Sir John Gates, Northumberland's friend and intimate, and one of the instigators of the plan for Edward VI to modify his will to facilitate Jane's succession.[102] The day before their executions, Northumberland and Gates were escorted to the Chapel of St. Peter ad Vincula, in the Tower grounds, where they both attended a Catholic Mass, took the communion and returned to that faith, abjuring Protestantism.[103] Northumberland's religious retraction outraged Jane, who was a fervent Protestant.[104][105] In September, the first Parliament of Mary's reign revoked the provisions of Edward's will that favoured Jane Grey's succession, declaring Mary her brother's rightful heir, and denounced and revoked Jane's proclamation as a usurper.[106]

For centuries, the attempt to alter the succession was mostly seen as a one-man plot by Northumberland.[107] Since the 1970s, however, many historians have attributed the inception of the "devise" and the insistence on its implementation to the king's initiative.[108] Diarmaid MacCulloch has made out Edward's "teenage dreams of founding an evangelical realm of Christ",[109] while David Starkey has stated that "Edward had a couple of co-operators, but the driving will was his".[110] Among other members of the Privy Chamber, Northumberland's intimate Sir John Gates has been suspected of suggesting to Edward to change his devise so that Lady Jane Grey herself—not just any sons of hers—could inherit the Crown.[111] Whatever the degree of his contribution, Edward was convinced that his word was law[112] and fully endorsed disinheriting his half-sisters: "barring Mary from the succession was a cause in which the young King believed".[113]

Trial and execution

[edit]
The Execution of Lady Jane Grey, by the French painter Paul Delaroche, 1833. National Gallery.

Referred to by the court as Jane Dudley, wife of Guildford, Jane was charged with high treason, as were her husband, two of his brothers, and the former archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Cranmer.[114] Their trial, by a special commission, took place on 13 November 1553, at Guildhall in the City of London. The commission was chaired by Sir Thomas White, Lord Mayor of London, and Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk. Other members included Edward Stanley, 3rd Earl of Derby, and John Bourchier, 2nd Earl of Bath. As was to be expected, all defendants were found guilty and sentenced to death. The Duke of Suffolk was also accused of high treason and sentenced to death, but thanks to his wife's close friendship with Mary, he was temporarily saved from being executed, although he remained under house arrest.[115][116] Jane's guilt, of having treacherously assumed the title and the power of the monarch, was evidenced by a number of documents she had signed as "Jane the Quene [sic]".[114] Her sentence was to "be burned alive on Tower Hill or beheaded as the Queen pleases" (burning was the traditional English punishment for treason committed by women).[117] The imperial ambassador reported to Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, that her life was to be spared.[3]

Jane submitted a letter of explanation to the Queen, "asking forgiveness ... for the sin she was accused of, informing her majesty about the truth of events."[118] In this account, she spoke of herself as "a wife who loves her husband".[119]

In December, Jane was allowed to walk freely in the Queen's Garden.[120] Lord Robert and Lord Guildford had to be content with taking the air on the leads of the Bell Tower.[121] Jane and Guildford may have had some contact with each other,[122] and at some point Guildford wrote a message to his father-in-law in Jane's prayer book:

Your loving and obedient son wishes unto your grace long life in this world with as much joy and comfort as ever I wish to myself, and in the world to come joy everlasting. Your humble son to his death, G. Dudley[123]

Official letter of Lady Jane Grey signing herself as "Jane the Quene [sic]". Inner Temple Library, London.

Mary initially decided to spare the lives of Jane and her husband, assuming that they had been mere pawns in the midst of a much larger political plan designed and orchestrated by Northumberland, and the Duke was executed on 22 August 1553, a month after Mary's accession to the throne. However, the Wyatt's Rebellion in January 1554 against Queen Mary's marriage plans with Philip of Spain ultimately sealed Jane's fate. The Queen's marriage plan was greeted with widespread opposition, not just among the populace but also among Members of Parliament and some of the privy councillors, and the Rebellion, which was joined by the Duke of Suffolk and Guildford's brothers, Robert and Henry Dudley, resulted from this dislike.[124] It was not the intention of the conspirators to bring Jane to the throne again. Nevertheless, at the height of the crisis, the Government decided to continue with the sentence against Jane and her husband. The former Queen was becoming a serious threat to Mary,[125] so the executions of Grey and Guildford Dudley were also an opportunity to remove possible inspirations for future unrest and unwelcome reminders of the past.[126] It troubled Queen to let her cousin die, but she accepted the Privy Council's advice. [127] Mary signed the order on 19 January.[128] Bishop and Lord Chancellor Gardiner pressed for the young couple's execution in a court sermon,[129] and the Imperial ambassador Simon Renard was happy to report that "Jane of Suffolk and her husband are to lose their heads."[130] Their execution was initially scheduled for 9 February 1554, but was postponed for three days to give Jane the opportunity to convert to Catholicism. Jane asked for a visit from Protestant divine, but the Queen denied her request,[129] and instead Mary sent her chaplain, Father John Feckenham to see Jane, who was initially not pleased about this.[131] Though she would not give in to his efforts "to save her soul", she became friends with him and allowed him to accompany her to the scaffold.[132]

The day before their executions, Lord Guildford asked Jane to have one last meeting, which she refused, explaining it "would only ... increase their misery and pain, it was better to put it off ... as they would meet shortly elsewhere, and live bound by indissoluble ties."[133]

Around ten o'clock in the morning of 12 February, Guildford was led towards Tower Hill, where "many ... gentlemen" waited to shake hands with him.[134] Guildford made a short speech to the assembled crowd, as was customary.[135] "Having no ghostly father with him",[136][note 1] he knelt, prayed, and asked the people to pray for him, "holding up his eyes and hands to God many times".[137] He was killed with one stroke of the axe, after which his body was conveyed on a cart to the Chapel of St Peter ad Vincula for burial. Watching the scene from her window, Jane exclaimed: "Oh, Guildford, Guildford!"[138] She was then taken out to Tower Green, inside the Tower, to be beheaded.[139] According to the account of her execution given in the anonymous Chronicle of Queen Jane and of Two Years of Queen Mary, which formed the basis for Raphael Holinshed's depiction, Jane gave a speech upon ascending the scaffold:

Good people, I am come hither to die, and by a law I am condemned to the same. The fact, indeed, against the Queen's highness was unlawful, and the consenting thereunto by me: but touching the procurement and desire thereof by me or on my behalf, I do wash my hands thereof in innocency, before God, and the face of you, good Christian people, this day.[140]

While admitting to action considered unlawful, she declared that "I do wash my hands thereof in innocence".[141][142] Jane then recited Psalm 51 (Have mercy upon me, O God) in English, and handed her gloves and handkerchief to her maid. The executioner asked her for forgiveness, which she granted him, pleading: "I pray you dispatch me quickly." Referring to her head, she asked, "Will you take it off before I lay me down?", and the axeman answered, "No, madam." She then blindfolded herself. Jane then failed to find the block with her hands, and cried, "What shall I do? Where is it?" Probably Sir Thomas Brydges, the Deputy Lieutenant of the Tower, helped her find her way. With her head on the block, Jane spoke the last words of Jesus as recounted in the Gospel of Luke: "Lord, into thy hands I commend my spirit!"[140]

Memorial tablet for Lady Jane Grey, in St Peter ad Vincula

Jane and Guildford are buried in the Chapel of St Peter ad Vincula on the north side of Tower Green. No memorial stone was erected at their grave.[143] Jane's father, the Duke of Suffolk, was executed 11 days after Jane, on 23 February 1554.[144]

The executions did not contribute to Mary's or the government's popularity.[145] Five months after the couple's death, John Knox, the famous Scottish reformer, wrote of them as "innocents ... such as by just laws and faithful witnesses can never be proved to have offended by themselves."[129] Of Guildford Dudley, the chronicler Grafton wrote ten years later: "even those that never before the time of his execution saw him, did with lamentable tears bewail his death."[145] Jane was considered a martyr by Protestants, appearing on several pages of Acts and Monuments, better known as the Book of Martyrs, written by John Foxe.[146]

Jane's mother, the Duchess of Suffolk, maintained good relations with Mary, who allowed her to reside in Richmond, although at the time she was still viewed with some suspicion by the Queen, and employed the Duchess's two surviving daughters as maids of honour. She married her Master of the Horse and chamberlain, Adrian Stokes, in March 1555.[147] She died in 1559.[148]

Legacy

[edit]
Main article: Cultural depictions of Lady Jane Grey

In 1836, American poet Lydia Sigourney published a poem, "Lady Jane Grey", in her volume Zinzendorff and Other Poems. In 1911, the British historian Albert Pollard called Jane "the traitor-heroine of the Reformation".[149] During the Marian persecutions and its aftermath, Jane became viewed as a Protestant martyr,[146] featuring prominently in the several editions of Foxe's Book of Martyrs (Actes and Monuments of these Latter and Perillous Dayes) by John Foxe.

Family tree

[edit]
Jane's relationship to the House of Tudor and other claimants to the English throne

Italics indicate people who predeceased Edward VI;
Arabic numerals (1–5) indicate Edward VI's line of succession at his death according to Henry VIII's will; and
Roman numerals (I–III) indicate Edward VI's line of succession at his death according to Edward's will.[150]

Henry VIIElizabeth of York
Henry VIIIMargaret TudorMary TudorCharles Brandon
Edward VIMary I
(1)		Elizabeth I
(2)		James V of ScotlandFrances BrandonHenry Grey
Mary, Queen of ScotsJane Grey
(3, I)		Katherine Grey
(4, II)		Mary Grey
(5, III)

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Williamson, David (2010). Kings & Queens. National Portrait Gallery Publications. p. 95. ISBN 978-1-85514-432-3
  2. ^ Ives 2009, p. 36; Florio 1607, p. 68
  3. ^ a b c d e f Plowden, Alison (2004). "Grey, Lady Jane (1537–1554), noblewoman and claimant to the English throne". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/8154. ISBN 0-19-861362-8. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  4. ^ "Lady Jane Grey". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 10 July 2021.
  5. ^ a b Potter, Philip J. (2014). Monarchs of the Renaissance: The Lives and Reigns of 42 European Kings and Queens. McFarland. pp. 83–84. ISBN 978-0-7864-9103-2.
  6. ^ Ives 2009, p. 2
  7. ^ Ascham 1863, p. 213
  8. ^ de Lisle 2008, pp. 5–8
  9. ^ a b Ives 2009, pp. 36, 299
  10. ^ Edwards, J. Stephan (28 September 2007). "On the Date of Birth of Lady Jane Grey Dudley". Some Grey Matter. Retrieved 15 June 2021.
  11. ^ Florio 1607, p. 68
  12. ^ Ives 2009, pp. 51, 65, Morrill 2021
  13. ^ "Page: A cyclopaedia of female biography.djvu/369" – via Wikisource, the free online library.
  14. ^ Ives 2009, pp. 63–67
  15. ^ Ives 2009, p. 51
  16. ^ Ives 2009, p. 53
  17. ^ Ives 2009, p. 52
  18. ^ Ives 2009, pp. 42–45
  19. ^ Dent, Emma (1877). Annals of Winchcombe and Sudeley. Sudeley Castle: J. Murray. p. 186.
  20. ^ "Early Portrait Of Elizabeth I Sells For $158,661 At Butterscotch". Antiques and the Arts Weekly. November 2021.
  21. ^ "Children of England: The Heirs of King Henry VIII/The Children of Henry VIII (1996)". Alison Weir. Retrieved 8 October 2023.
  22. ^ "Lady Jane Grey Revealed – The Syon Portrait". J. Stephan Edwards. 30 September 2010. Archived from the original on 13 February 2012. Retrieved 8 October 2023.
  23. ^ Edwards, J. Stephan (2015). A Queen of a New Invention – Portraits of Lady Jane Grey, England's 'Nine Days Queen'. Palm Springs, California: Old John. pp. 168–176. ISBN 978-0-9863873-0-2.
  24. ^ Ives 2009, pp. 45–47
  25. ^ Ives 2009, pp. 47–49
  26. ^ Ives 2009, p. 47
  27. ^ Loades 1996, pp. 238–239
  28. ^ Loades 1996, p. 179
  29. ^ de Lisle 2008, pp. 93, 304; Ives 2009, p. 321.
  30. ^ Ives 2009, p. 137
  31. ^ a b Alford 2002, pp. 171–172
  32. ^ Porter 2007, p. 121; Waller, p. 33; Whitelock, p. 81.
  33. ^ Ives (2009, p. 2)
  34. ^ Ives 2009, p. 35
  35. ^ Starkey 2001, pp. 111–112.
  36. ^ Ives (2009, p. 140)
  37. ^ a b c Dale Hoak: "Edward VI (1537–1553)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004, online edn. January 2008, Retrieved 4 April 2010 (subscription required)
  38. ^ Loades 1996, p. 239
  39. ^ Loades (1996, p. 230)
  40. ^ Porter (2010, p. 3461)
  41. ^ Ives (2009, pp. 144–145, 157)
  42. ^ Ives (2009, p. 155)
  43. ^ Lee (2006, p. 25)
  44. ^ Ives (2009, p. 107)
  45. ^ Loades 1996, p. 105; Porter 2007, pp. 119–123; Waller, pp. 34–36; Whitelock, pp. 90–91.
  46. ^ Porter 2007, pp. 188–189.
  47. ^ Lindsay, Thomas Martin (1882). The Reformation. T&T. Clark. p. 149.
  48. ^ Tallis, Nicola (2016). Crown of Blood: The Deadly Inheritance of Lady Jane Grey. Pegasus Books. ISBN 978-1-68177-287-5 – via Google Books.
  49. ^ Loades 1996, p. 240; Alford 2014, pp. 75–56; Loach 2002, pp. 163–164
  50. ^ Ives (2009, p. 141)
  51. ^ Ives (2009, pp. 139–141)
  52. ^ Ives 2009, pp. 145, 165–166
  53. ^ Ives 2009 p. 187
  54. ^ Ives 2009 p. 188
  55. ^ a b Ives 2009 p. 189
  56. ^ Chapman 1962 pp. 117–118; Ives 2009 p. 189
  57. ^ Loades 1996, pp. 239–240, 237.
  58. ^ Waller 2006, pp. 48–49.
  59. ^ Whitelock 2009, p. 165.
  60. ^ Loades 1996, pp. 257–258.
  61. ^ Loach 2002, p. 170.
  62. ^ a b Jordan 1970, p. 521.
  63. ^ Elton 1977, p. 375; Dickens 1967, p. 353.
  64. ^ Ives (2009, pp. 235, 237)
  65. ^ Jordan 1970, p. 524; Elton 1977, p. 375.
  66. ^ a b c Chapman 1962, p. 122.
  67. ^ Loades 1996 pp. 259–261
  68. ^ Jordan 1970, p. 522.
  69. ^ Loades 1996 pp. 258–261
  70. ^ a b Loades 1996 p. 261
  71. ^ Ives 2009 p. 198
  72. ^ Porter 2007 p. 203; Waller 2006 p. 52
  73. ^ Tittler 1991, p. 10; Erickson 1978, pp. 292–293.
  74. ^ Erickson 1978, p. 291.
  75. ^ Adams 2008a; Loades 2008
  76. ^ Ives 2009 pp. 209–212; Loach 2002 p. 172
  77. ^ Ives 2009 p. 242
  78. ^ Ives 2009 pp. 241–242, 243–244
  79. ^ Nichols 1850 p. 10
  80. ^ Nichols 1850 p. 10; Ives 2009 p. 243
  81. ^ Ives 2009 pp. 243–244
  82. ^ Chapman 1962 pp. 150–151
  83. ^ Ives 2009 pp. 246, 241–242, 243–244
  84. ^ Loades 2004, p. 134.
  85. ^ Alford 2002 p. 7
  86. ^ Alford 2002 p. 8; Loades 1996 p. 257
  87. ^ Loades 1996 p. 265
  88. ^ Ives 2009 p. 214
  89. ^ Waller 2006, pp. 51–53
  90. ^ Whitelock 2009, pp. 138–165
  91. ^ Chisholm 1911, p. 707.
  92. ^ Ives 2009, pp. 222–223, 225–227, 233–236
  93. ^ Loades 2004, p. 135.
  94. ^ Stow, John. "Of Towers and Castels." A Survey of London. Reprinted From the Text of 1603. Ed. C L Kingsford. Oxford: Clarendon, 1908. 44–71. British History Online. Web. 17 March 2023. http://www.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/survey-of-london-stow/1603/pp44-71.
  95. ^ Ives 2009 p. 215
  96. ^ Ives 2009 pp. 184, 241
  97. ^ Waller 2006, pp. 57–59
  98. ^ Ives 2009, p. 1
  99. ^ Ives 2009, p. 249.
  100. ^ Wilson 1981, p. 59.
  101. ^ Gunn, S. J. (1999). "A Letter of Jane, Duchess of Northumberland, 1553". English Historical Review. CXIV: 1267–1271. doi:10.1093/ehr/114.459.1267.
  102. ^ Nichols p. 21; Ives pp. 150–151
  103. ^ Nichols pp. 19–20
  104. ^ Ives 2009 p. 249
  105. ^ Loades 1996 p. 268
  106. ^ Potter, Philip J. (2014). Monarchs of the Renaissance: The Lives and Reigns of 42 European Kings and Queens. McFarland. pp. 88–89. ISBN 978-0-7864-9103-2.
  107. ^ Ives 2009, p. 128.
  108. ^ e.g.: Jordan 1970, pp. 514–517; Loades 1996, pp. 239–241; Starkey 2001, pp. 112–114; MacCulloch 2002, pp. 39–41; Alford 2002, pp. 171–174; Skidmore 2007, pp. 247–250; Ives 2009, pp. 136–142, 145–148; Dale Hoak (2004). "Edward VI (1537–1553)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/8522. Retrieved 4 April 2010. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.) (subscription required)
  109. ^ MacCulloch 2002, p. 41.
  110. ^ Starkey 2001, p. 112.
  111. ^ Dale Hoak (2004). "Edward VI (1537–1553)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/8522. Retrieved 4 April 2010. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.) (subscription required)
  112. ^ Mackie 1952, p. 524.
  113. ^ Hoak 1980, p. 49.
  114. ^ a b Tallis, Nicola (2016). Crown of Blood: The Deadly Inheritance of Lady Jane Grey. Pegasus. ISBN 978-1-68177-287-5 – via Google Books.
  115. ^ Grey, Henry, duke of Suffolk (1517–1554), magnate by Robert C. Braddock in Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford University Press, 2004)
  116. ^ Bradley, Emily Tennyson (1890). "Grey, Henry (d.1554)" . Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 23. pp. 201–202.
  117. ^ Ives 2009, pp. 251–252, 334; Bellamy 1979, p. 54
  118. ^ Ives 2009 p. 18
  119. ^ Ives 2009 p. 186
  120. ^ Ives 2009 pp. 252, 355
  121. ^ Nichols 1850 p. 33
  122. ^ Ives 2009 p. 252; Wilson 1981 p. 59
  123. ^ Ives p. 185
  124. ^ Ives 2009 pp. 261–262
  125. ^ Froude (1910, p. 102)
  126. ^ Ives 2009 pp. 265–268
  127. ^ Porter 2007, p. 302.
  128. ^ Waller 2006, p. 62
  129. ^ a b c Ives 2009 p. 268
  130. ^ Chapman 1962 p. 190
  131. ^ Ives 2009, pp. 267, 268
  132. ^ Ives 2009, pp. 268–270
  133. ^ Ives 2009 p. 274
  134. ^ Nichols 1850 p. 55; Ives 2009 p. 274–275
  135. ^ Chapman 1962 p. 204
  136. ^ Nichols 1850 p. 55
  137. ^ Ives 2009, p. 275
  138. ^ Ives 2009, pp. 274–275
  139. ^ Ives, Eric (2011). Lady Jane Grey: A Tudor Mystery. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4443-5426-3 – via Google Books.
  140. ^ a b Anonymous (1997) [1850]. "1554, The Execution of Lady Jane Grey and Lord Guildford Dudley". In Nichols, John Gough (ed.). Chronicle of Queen Jane and of Two Years of Queen Mary. The Camden Society; Marilee Hanson.
  141. ^ de Lisle 2008, p. 138
  142. ^ Ives, Eric (2011). Lady Jane Grey: A Tudor Mystery. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4443-5426-3 – via Google Books.
  143. ^ Tallis, Nicola (2016). Crown of Blood: The Deadly Inheritance of Lady Jane Grey. Pegasus. ISBN 978-1-68177-287-5 – via Google Books.
  144. ^ Cokayne, George (1982). The complete peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain, and the United Kingdom, extant, extinct, or dormant. Vol. 2. Gloucester: A. Sutton. p. 421. ISBN 0-904387-82-8.
  145. ^ a b Ives 2009, p. 276
  146. ^ a b Marsden, Jean I. (2002). "Sex, Politics, and She-Tragedy: Reconfiguring Lady Jane Grey". SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900. 42 (3): 501–522. ISSN 0039-3657. JSTOR 1556177.
  147. ^ Ives 2009, p. 38
  148. ^ Warnicke, Retha M. (2008). "Grey [other married name Stokes], Frances [née Lady Frances Brandon], duchess of Suffolk". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/65987. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  149. ^ Pollard, Albert J. (1911). The History of England. London: Longmans, Green. p. 111. Archived from the original on 30 April 2009. Retrieved 2 September 2017.
  150. ^ Ives 2009, Figures 1–5

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Guildford had probably refused to be attended by a Catholic priest and been denied a Protestant divine (Nichols p. 55).

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Wikisource has original works on the topic: House of Tudor
Lady Jane Grey
Born: 1537 Died: 12 February 1554
Regnal titles
Preceded byas undisputed king — DISPUTED —
Queen of England and Ireland
10–19 July 1553
Disputed by Mary I 		Succeeded byas undisputed queen
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Lady_Jane_Grey&oldid=1263559866"