Newton–Gauss line

In geometry, the Newton–Gauss line (or Gauss–Newton line) is the line joining the midpoints of the three diagonals of a complete quadrilateral.

The midpoints of the two diagonals of a convex quadrilateral with at most two parallel sides are distinct and thus determine a line, the Newton line. If the sides of such a quadrilateral are extended to form a complete quadrangle, the diagonals of the quadrilateral remain diagonals of the complete quadrangle and the Newton line of the quadrilateral is the Newton–Gauss line of the complete quadrangle.

Complete quadrilaterals

Any four lines in general position (no two lines are parallel, and no three are concurrent) form a complete quadrilateral. This configuration consists of a total of six points, the intersection points of the four lines, with three points on each line and precisely two lines through each point.^[1] These six points can be split into pairs so that the line segments determined by any pair do not intersect any of the given four lines except at the endpoints. These three line segments are called diagonals of the complete quadrilateral.

Existence of the Newton−Gauss line

It is a well-known theorem that the three midpoints of the diagonals of a complete quadrilateral are collinear.^[2] There are several proofs of the result based on areas ^[2] or wedge products^[3] or, as the following proof, on Menelaus's theorem, due to Hillyer and published in 1920.^[4]

Let the complete quadrilateral $ABCA'B'C'$ be labeled as in the diagram with diagonals $AA', BB', CC'$ and their respective midpoints $L, M, N$ . Let the midpoints of $BC, CA', A'B$ be $P, Q, R$ respectively. Using similar triangles it is seen that $QR$ intersects $AA'$ at $L$ , $RP$ intersects $BB'$ at $M$ and $PQ$ intersects $CC'$ at $N$ . Again, similar triangles provide the following proportions,

{\frac {\overline {RL}}{\overline {LQ}}}={\frac {\overline {BA}}{\overline {AC}}},\quad {\frac {\overline {QN}}{\overline {NP}}}={\frac {\overline {A'C'}}{\overline {C'B}}},\quad {\frac {\overline {PM}}{\overline {MR}}}={\frac {\overline {CB'}}{\overline {B'A'}}}.

However, the line $A’B'C$ intersects the sides of triangle $△ ABC$ , so by Menelaus's theorem the product of the terms on the right hand sides is −1. Thus, the product of the terms on the left hand sides is also −1 and again by Menelaus's theorem, the points $L, M, N$ are collinear on the sides of triangle $△ PQR$ .

Applications to cyclic quadrilaterals

The following are some results that use the Newton–Gauss line of complete quadrilaterals that are associated with cyclic quadrilaterals, based on the work of Barbu and Patrascu.^[5]

Equal angles

Given any cyclic quadrilateral $ABCD$ , let point $F$ be the point of intersection between the two diagonals $AC$ and $BD$ . Extend the diagonals $AB$ and $CD$ until they meet at the point of intersection, $E$ . Let the midpoint of the segment $EF$ be $N$ , and let the midpoint of the segment $BC$ be $M$ (Figure 1).

Theorem

If the midpoint of the line segment $BF$ is $P$ , the Newton–Gauss line of the complete quadrilateral $ABCDEF$ and the line $PM$ determine an angle $∠ PMN$ equal to $∠ EFD$ .

Proof

First show that the triangles $△ NPM, △ EDF$ are similar.

Since $BE ∥ PN$ and $FC ∥ PM$ , we know $∠ NPM = ∠ EAC$ . Also, ${\tfrac {\overline {BE}}{\overline {PN}}}={\tfrac {\overline {FC}}{\overline {PM}}}=2.$

In the cyclic quadrilateral $ABCD$ , these equalities hold:

{\begin{aligned}\angle EDF&=\angle ADF+\angle EDA,\\&=\angle ACB+\angle ABC,\\&=\angle EAC.\end{aligned}}

Therefore, $∠ NPM = ∠ EDF$ .

Let $R 1, R 2$ be the radii of the circumcircles of $△ EDB, △ FCD$ respectively. Apply the law of sines to the triangles, to obtain:

{\frac {\overline {BE}}{\overline {FC}}}={\frac {2R_{1}\sin \angle EDB}{2R_{2}\sin \angle FDC}}={\frac {R_{1}}{R_{2}}}={\frac {2R_{1}\sin \angle EBD}{2R_{2}\sin \angle FCD}}={\frac {\overline {DE}}{\overline {DF}}}.

Since $BE = 2 \cdot PN$ and $FC = 2 \cdot PM$ , this shows the equality ${\tfrac {\overline {PN}}{\overline {PM}}}={\tfrac {\overline {DE}}{\overline {DF}}}.$ The similarity of triangles $△ PMN, △ DFE$ follows, and $∠ NMP = ∠ EFD$ .

Remark

If $Q$ is the midpoint of the line segment $FC$ , it follows by the same reasoning that $∠ NMQ = ∠ EFA$ .

Isogonal lines

Theorem

The line through $E$ parallel to the Newton–Gauss line of the complete quadrilateral $ABCDEF$ and the line $EF$ are isogonal lines of $∠ BEC$ , that is, each line is a reflection of the other about the angle bisector.^[5] (Figure 2)

Proof

Triangles $△ EDF, △ NPM$ are similar by the above argument, so $∠ DEF = ∠ PNM$ . Let $E'$ be the point of intersection of $BC$ and the line parallel to the Newton–Gauss line $NM$ through $E$ .

Since $PN ∥ BE$ and $NM ∥ EE',$ $∠ BEF = ∠ PNF$ , and $∠ FNM = ∠ E'EF$ .

Therefore,

{\begin{aligned}\angle CEE'&=\angle DEF-\angle E'EF,\\&=\angle PNM-\angle FNM,\\&=\angle PNF=\angle BEF.\end{aligned}}

Two cyclic quadrilaterals sharing a Newton-Gauss line

Lemma

Let $G$ and $H$ be the orthogonal projections of the point $F$ on the lines $AB$ and $CD$ respectively.

The quadrilaterals $MPGN$ and $MQHN$ are cyclic quadrilaterals.^[5]

Proof

$∠ EFD = ∠ PMN$ , as previously shown. The points $P$ and $N$ are the respective circumcenters of the right triangles $△ BFG, △ EFG$ . Thus, $∠ PGF = ∠ PFG$ and $∠ FGN = ∠ GFN$ .

Therefore,

{\begin{aligned}\angle PGN+\angle PMN&=(\angle PGF+\angle FGN)+\angle PMN\\[4pt]&=\angle PFG+\angle GFN+\angle EFD\\[4pt]&=180^{\circ }\end{aligned}}.

Therefore, $MPGN$ is a cyclic quadrilateral, and by the same reasoning, $MQHN$ also lies on a circle.

Theorem

Extend the lines $GF, HF$ to intersect $EC, EB$ at $I, J$ respectively (Figure 4).

The complete quadrilaterals $EFGHIJ$ and $ABCDEF$ have the same Newton–Gauss line.^[5]

Proof

The two complete quadrilaterals have a shared diagonal, $EF$ . $N$ lies on the Newton–Gauss line of both quadrilaterals. $N$ is equidistant from $G$ and $H$ , since it is the circumcenter of the cyclic quadrilateral $EGFH$ .

If triangles $△ GMP, △ HMQ$ are congruent, and it will follow that $M$ lies on the perpendicular bisector of the line $HG$ . Therefore, the line $MN$ contains the midpoint of $GH$ , and is the Newton–Gauss line of $EFGHIJ$ .

To show that the triangles $△ GMP, △ HMQ$ are congruent, first observe that $PMQF$ is a parallelogram, since the points $M, P$ are midpoints of $BF, BC$ respectively.

Therefore,

{\begin{aligned}&{\overline {MP}}={\overline {QF}}={\overline {HQ}},\\&{\overline {GP}}={\overline {PF}}={\overline {MQ}},\\&\angle MPF=\angle FQM.\end{aligned}}

Also note that

\angle FPG=2\angle PBG=2\angle DBA=2\angle DCA=2\angle HCF=\angle HQF.

Hence,

{\begin{aligned}\angle MPG&=\angle MPF+\angle FPG,\\&=\angle FQM+\angle HQF,\\&=\angle HQF+\angle FQM,\\&=\angle HQM.\end{aligned}}

Therefore, $△ GMP$ and $△ HMQ$ are congruent by SAS.

Remark

Due to $△ GMP, △ HMQ$ being congruent triangles, their circumcircles $MPGN, MQHN$ are also congruent.

= Relation with the Miquel point

The point at infinity along the Newton line is the isogonal conjugate of the Miquel point.

History

The Newton–Gauss line proof was developed by the two mathematicians it is named after: Sir Isaac Newton and Carl Friedrich Gauss.^{[citation needed]} The initial framework for this theorem is from the work of Newton, in his previous theorem on the Newton line, in which Newton showed that the center of a conic inscribed in a quadrilateral lies on the Newton–Gauss line.^[6]

The theorem of Gauss and Bodenmiller states that the three circles whose diameters are the diagonals of a complete quadrilateral are coaxal.^[7]

Notes

^ Alperin, Roger C. (6 January 2012). "Gauss–Newton Lines and Eleven Point Conics". Research Gate.
^ ^a ^b Johnson 2007, p. 62
^ Pedoe, Dan (1988) [1970], Geometry A Comprehensive Course, Dover, pp. 46–47, ISBN 0-486-65812-0
^ Johnson 2007, p. 152
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Patrascu, Ion. "Some Properties of the Newton–Gauss Line" (PDF). Forum Geometricorum. Retrieved 29 April 2019.
^ Wells, David (1991), The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Geometry, Penguin Books, p. 36, ISBN 978-0-14-011813-1
^ Johnson 2007, p. 172

References

Johnson, Roger A. (2007) [1929], Advanced Euclidean Geometry, Dover, ISBN 978-0-486-46237-0
- (available on-line as) Johnson, Roger A. (1929). "Modern Geometry: An Elementary Treatise on the Geometry of the Triangle and the Circle". HathiTrust. Retrieved 28 May 2019.

External links

Bogomonly, Alexander. "Theorem of Complete Quadrilateral: What is it?". Retrieved 11 May 2019.

[:1-1] Alperin, Roger C. (6 January 2012). "Gauss–Newton Lines and Eleven Point Conics". Research Gate.

[Johson62-2] Johnson 2007, p. 62

[3] Pedoe, Dan (1988) [1970], Geometry A Comprehensive Course, Dover, pp. 46–47, ISBN 0-486-65812-0

[4] Johnson 2007, p. 152

[:2-5] Patrascu, Ion. "Some Properties of the Newton–Gauss Line" (PDF). Forum Geometricorum. Retrieved 29 April 2019.

[6] Wells, David (1991), The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Geometry, Penguin Books, p. 36, ISBN 978-0-14-011813-1

[7] Johnson 2007, p. 172

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]