Jump to content

Nanook of the North: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 21: Line 21:
.
.


==Film==
Film==
The film was shot near [[Inukjuak, Quebec|Inukjuak]], on [[Hudson Bay]] in Arctic [[Quebec]], Canada. Having worked as a prospector and explorer in Arctic Canada among the Inuit, Flaherty was familiar with his subjects and set out to document their lifestyle. Flaherty had shot film in the region prior to this period, but that footage was destroyed in a fire started when Flaherty dropped a cigarette onto the [[original camera negative]] (which was highly flammable [[nitrate]] stock). Flaherty therefore made ''Nanook of the North'' in its place. Funded by [[France|French]] fur company [[Revillon Frères]], the film was shot from August 1920 to August 1921.
The film was shot near [[Inukjuak, Quebec|Inukjuak]], on [[Hudson Bay]] in Arctic [[Quebec]], Canada. Having worked as a prospector and explorer in Arctic Canada among the Inuit, Flaherty was familiar with his subjects and set out to document their lifestyle. Flaherty had shot film in the region prior to this period, but that footage was destroyed in a fire started when Flaherty dropped a cigarette onto the [[original camera negative]] (which was highly flammable [[nitrate]] stock). Flaherty therefore made ''Nanook of the North'' in its place. Funded by [[France|French]] fur company [[Revillon Frères]], the film was shot from August 1920 to August 1921.



Revision as of 23:40, 28 January 2010

Nanook of the North
Directed byRobert J. Flaherty
Written byRobert J. Flaherty
Produced byRobert J. Flaherty
StarringAllakariallak (Nanook)
Nyla
Cunayou
CinematographyRobert J. Flaherty
Edited byRobert J. Flaherty
Charles Gelb
Music byStanley Silverman
Release date
United States June 11, 1922
Running time
79 min.
CountryUnited States
LanguagesSilent film
English intertitles

Nanook of the North: A Story Of Life and Love In the Actual Arctic (1922) is a silent documentary film by Robert J. Flaherty. In the tradition of what would later be called salvage ethnography, Flaherty captured the struggles of the Inuk Nanook and his family in the Canadian arctic. The film is considered the first feature-length documentary, though Flaherty has been criticized for staging several sequences and thereby distorting the reality of his subjects' lives.[1]

In 1989, this film was one of the first 25 films to be selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".

Nyla, wife of Nanook

.

Film== The film was shot near Inukjuak, on Hudson Bay in Arctic Quebec, Canada. Having worked as a prospector and explorer in Arctic Canada among the Inuit, Flaherty was familiar with his subjects and set out to document their lifestyle. Flaherty had shot film in the region prior to this period, but that footage was destroyed in a fire started when Flaherty dropped a cigarette onto the original camera negative (which was highly flammable nitrate stock). Flaherty therefore made Nanook of the North in its place. Funded by French fur company Revillon Frères, the film was shot from August 1920 to August 1921.

As the first nonfiction work of its scale, Nanook of the North was ground-breaking cinema. It captured a foreign culture in a remote location, rather than a facsimile of reality using actors and props on a studio set. Traditional Inuit methods of hunting, fishing, igloo-building, and other customs were shown with accuracy, and the compelling story of a man and his family struggling against nature met with great success in North America and abroad.

Assessment

Flaherty has been criticized for deceptively portraying staged events as reality, although staging events for the camera was the norm of documentary filmmakers of the time[2]. "Nanook" was in fact named Allakariallak, while the "wife" shown in the film was not really his wife. And although Allakariallak normally used a gun when hunting, Flaherty encouraged him to hunt after the fashion of his recent ancestors in order to capture the way the Inuit lived before European influence. On the other hand, while Flaherty made his Inuit actors use spears instead of guns during the walrus and seal hunts, the hunting actually involved wild animals. Flaherty also exaggerated the peril to Inuit hunters with his claim, often repeated, that Allakariallak had died of starvation two years after the film was completed, whereas in fact he died at home, likely of tuberculosis.[3][4]

Flaherty defended his work by stating that a filmmaker must often distort a thing to catch its true spirit. Later filmmakers have pointed out that the only cameras available to Flaherty at the time were both large and immobile, making it impossible to effectively capture most interior shots or unstructured exterior scenes without significantly modifying the environment and subject action. For example, the Inuit crew had to build a special three-walled igloo for Flaherty's bulky camera so that there would be enough light for it to capture interior shots.

At the time, few documentaries had been filmed and there was little precedent to guide Flaherty's work. Since Flaherty's time both staging action and attempting to steer documentary action have come to be considered unethical amongst cinéma vérité purists, because they believe such reenactments deceive the audience.

Other works

The story of the film and the people it was made among is told in The Long Exile: A True Story of Deception and Survival Amongst the Inuit of the Canadian Arctic, by Melanie McGrath.[5][6][7] (See also High Arctic relocation.)

Kabloonak is a 1994 film about the making of Nanook of the North. Charles Dance plays Flaherty and Adamie Quasiak Inukpuk (a relative of Nanook) plays Nanook.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Essay by Dean W. Duncan". Criterion Collection. Retrieved May 18, 2007.
  2. ^ "Richard Leacock Essay (Flaherty's Cameraman in the '40's and later MIT professor of film studies)".
  3. ^ Pamela R. Stern, Historical Dictionary of the Inuit (Lanham, MD:Scarecrow Press, 2004), p. 23.
  4. ^ Robert J. Christopher, Robert and Frances Flaherty: A Documentary Life, 1883-1922 (Montréal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2005), pp. 387-388
  5. ^ Amazon review of The Long Exile
  6. ^ The Observer review
  7. ^ New York Times review