Talk:Territorial control during the Russo-Ukrainian War

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Territorial control during the Russo-Ukrainian War article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, the following pages redirect here:

Rules for editing the map

A reliable source for that specific edit should be provided.
1. A well-known source that has a reputation for neutral (not biased) territorial control coverage, can be used (is deemed reliable) for all edits.
2. A well-known source that does not have a reputation for neutral (not biased) territorial control coverage, can be used (is deemed reliable) only for edits that are unfavorable to the side it prefers (favorable to the side it opposes).
3. A source that is not well-known (or that has proven inaccurate for all edits) cannot be used (is deemed unreliable) for any edit. This includes all maps (see item 2. next).
4. Do not put source URLs in edit summaries. The references at Territorial control during the Russo-Ukrainian War must be updated before the map is edited.
Copying from maps is strictly prohibited.
Maps from mainstream media are approximate and therefore unreliable for any edit. Maps from amateur sources are below the standards of Wikipedia for any edit. They violate WP:SPS and WP:CIRCULAR.
WP:SPS: "Anyone can create a personal web page, self-publish a book, or claim to be an expert. That is why self-published material, such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs, Internet forum postings, and tweets, are largely not acceptable as sources."
WP:CIRCULAR: "Do not use websites that mirror Wikipedia content or publications that rely on material from Wikipedia as sources."
See also: Wikipedia:Top 10 reasons why copying from maps is strictly prohibited on the Wikipedia Syria war map
WP:POV pushing and intentional misinterpretation of sources will not be tolerated.
If you are not sure what the source is saying (or its reliability), post it on the talk page first so that it will be discussed.
See also: Wikipedia:Top 10 myths about the Wikipedia Syria war map

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Military history: Russian & Soviet / Post-Cold War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Ukraine Mid‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

On 26 February 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Cities and towns during the Russo-Ukrainian War. The result of the discussion was Moved to Control of cities during the Russo-Ukrainian War.

On 30 September 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Control of localities during the Russo-Ukrainian War. The result of the discussion was Moved to Territorial control during the Russo-Ukrainian War.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 13 April 2022, see discussion.
keep, 28 February 2022, see discussion.

Krasnohorivka

On the map, Krasnohorivka should be shown as mostly captured (red circle with a spinning icon in the top left, similar to Toretsk or Selydove currently).

~< Valentinianus I (talk) >~ 11:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 17:32, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vyimka

Vyimka is captured according to Russian MOD: "Russia says it has captured two more settlements in east Ukraine". Reuters.

~< Valentinianus I (talk) >~ 11:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and that's what they claim; it's not yet confirmed by any reliable source. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 17:37, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kursk Oblast

Kurchatov and the KNPP are missing from the territorial control list and the detailed map. They, together with Lgov and Rylsk, were seemingly the end goals for the Kursk offensive.

Further more, Belaya and Bolshoye Soldatskoye are on the list, but not on the map. Adding them would make the approximate extent of the Sudzha salient/incursion more visible.

~< Valentinianus I (talk) >~ 13:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 14:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Toretsk urban hromada

The capture of Pivdenne is missing from the timeline. I'd suggest going with the Russian date, as there is no alternative Ukrainian date. The "confirmed capture" date is just ISW admitting it was captured, not when.
The capture of Zalizne is also missing from the timeline. I'd again suggest going with the Russian date, as there is no alternative Ukrainian date. The "confirmed capture" date is just ISW admitting it was captured, not when.
Pivnichne is claimed captured since at least 31 August 2024: "7 killed by Russian attacks as Moscow pushes ahead in Ukraine's east". AP News.

~< Valentinianus I (talk) >~ 08:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with all 3 suggestions. Asigooo (talk) 22:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About Timeline of total controlled territory section - Crimea

I think it'd be better if u stated that "territory" in this part includes crimea, since crimea is seen autonomous by some people. Asigooo (talk) 21:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Verkhniokamianske

Claimed captured by russian MoD 2 days ago Asigooo (talk) 10:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Updated. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 23:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has most likely been a lie made by the local commanders, because Rybar disputed the capture.

Link to their Telegram post: https://t.me/rybar/64284

The German Focus online has been the only newspaper I know that has covered this:

"Russische Militärblogger decken Lügen auf, die viele Soldaten das Leben kosten". FOCUS online. [According to British military historian Chris Owen, the military bloggers claim that a few days ago, Russian Telegram channels reported that areas in the Siversk region were being conquered. These included the villages of Hryhorivka and Verkhnokamianske. The troops had advanced as far as Serebrianka, it said. A false report. The military blogger ‘Militärinformant’ writes: ‘The commanders have labelled conquests where there were no successes by the Russian army. Their aim was to announce victories in the media and send success stories to their superiors.’]

Zirkusradler (talk) 16:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to have been false, yes, but the source used (ISW) maintained that the village had been captured despite reports otherwise from milbloggers. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 16:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because of the flag that was apparently drone-dropped.

The ISW is not very reliable, it just repeats claims from Telegram channels, but somehow it's considered a WP:RS and Telegram channels are not. Zirkusradler (talk) 17:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with @Zirkusradler Village is not under RF control. Asigooo (talk) 10:27, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New timeline additions

Greetings!

There are a bunch of villages and towns missing from the timeline:

September: Russia captured Pivdenne, Donetsk Oblast between around 30 July – 5 September 2024.; Russia captured Zalizne, Donetsk Oblast between around 19 August – 5 September 2024.

October: Russia recaptured Makiivka, Luhansk Oblast by 16 October 2024.; Russia recaptured Nevske, Luhansk Oblast on 16 October 2024.; Russia captured Zolota Nyva, Donetsk Oblast [uk] between around 8–26 October 2024.; Russia recaptured Levadne, Zaporizhzhia Oblast between around 14–27 October 2024.

Missing sources

Nevske:

claimed captured: "Russian Military Says Captured Village Near Ukaine's Pokrovsk". The Moscow Times. Russia's Defense Ministry said it captured the village of Nevske
captured: "Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, October 16, 2024". Institute for the Study of War. Geolocated footage published on October 16 indicates that Russian forces recently advanced in northern Nevske and suggests that widespread Russian claims that Russian forces seized the settlement are accurate.

Zolota Nyva [uk]:

claimed captured: "With Vuhledar lost and another Ukrainian stronghold in danger, Russia could take southern Donbas by year's end". Meduza. Russian troops attacked and achieved a localized breakthrough on October 8, capturing the village of Zolota Nyva
captured: "Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, October 26, 2024". Institute for the Study of War. Geolocated footage published on October 26 showing a Russian reinforced platoon-sized assault and another Russian reduced company-sized assault indicates that Russian forces recently advanced north of Zolota Nyva

Levadne:

claimed captured: "Russia says it's captured a southern Ukraine village in a push before winter". Euronews. Russia claimed on Monday that it captured the Ukrainian village of Levadne
captured: "Occupation of Levadne in Zaporizhzhia region. Armed Forces update". RBC-Ukraine. on October 27, DeepState reported that the Russian army has occupied the village of Levadne

Trivia

Stelmakhivka was a recapture. Please adjust this as well.

Nevske has been recently renamed to Balka Zhuravka. Since this was an in-war rename and Russia doesn't recognize Ukrainian renames, I don't think it matters.

Nevske and Zolota Nyva are also not present in the Donetsk Oblast table.

On the map, the dot for Levadne is way too big. This hamlet with one guy pre-war population should have the smallest dot possible.

Cheers. Zirkusradler (talk) 15:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most of these have been fixed. I can add Levadne and Zolota Nyva to the table sometime if you think it's a pressing issue, though adding a settlement with one person to the table seems a bit excessive. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 02:59, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

I agree, they are not important. Though Levadne is "one of the 14" and is already present in the Zaporizhzhia Oblast table and the timeline as a Ukrainian capture.

Unrelated: Could you also remove the "likely" from the recapture of Staromaiorske in the timeline? The capture has been confirmed since a while and near-captures shouldn't be in the timeline IMO anyway. Zirkusradler (talk) 11:39, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 November 2024

This edit request to Module:Russo-Ukrainian War detailed map has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The longitude of Metiolkine in Luhansk is wrong. { lat = "48.930", long = "39.550", mark = "Location dot red.svg", marksize = 6, label = "Metiolkine", link = "Territorial control during the Russo-Ukrainian War#Metiolkine", label_size = 50},

It should be changed to: { lat = "48.930", long = "38.550", mark = "Location dot red.svg", marksize = 4, label = "Metiolkine", link = "Territorial control during the Russo-Ukrainian War#Metiolkine", label_size = 0}, 帕迪沙 (talk) 09:41, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 10:08, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]