Jump to content

Lucas v. United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Lucas v United States)

Lucas v. United States
Argued November 19, 1895
Decided May 25, 1896
Full case nameLucas v. United States
Docket no.692
Citations163 U.S. 612 (more)
16 S. Ct. 1168; 41 L. Ed. 282
Case history
PriorUnited States v. Lucas, (C.C.W.D. Ark.)
Holding
Whether a Negro Freeman who was murdered was a member of the Choctaw Tribe is a question of fact for the jury, and his non-Indian status may not be presumed.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Melville Fuller
Associate Justices
Stephen J. Field · John M. Harlan
Horace Gray · David J. Brewer
Henry B. Brown · George Shiras Jr.
Edward D. White · Rufus W. Peckham
Case opinion
MajorityShiras
Peckham took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
14 Stat. 769; 23 Stat. 362; 25 Stat. 786; 26 Stat. 81

Lucas v. United States, 163 U.S. 612 (1896), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that whether a Black Freedman was a member of the Choctaw Nation was a question of fact for the jury, and his non-Indian status may not be presumed.

Background

[edit]
Judge Parker's courtroom where Lucas was tried

The Choctaw Nation was one of the Five Civilized Tribes in the Indian Territory (now the eastern part of Oklahoma),[a] and under their treaty with the United States, were allowed to have its own court system to try Indian on Indian crime.[2] When the crime was Choctaw on Choctaw, the tribal courts would handle the trial, but if it involved a non-tribal member, the case was handled by the federal court in Fort Smith, Arkansas.[3] Tribal members included Freedmen, African-Americans who had been slaves and who had been adopted by the tribe after the Civil War.[4]

In 1894, Eli Lucas,[b] a member of the Choctaw Nation, was indicted in the Circuit Court for the Western District of Arkansas for the murder of Levy Kemp, an African-American.[6][c] In 1895, Lucas was tried in Judge Isaac Parker's court, where witnesses said that Lucas had followed Kemp after a ball game and killed him.[8][d] The defense claimed that Lucas was not truthful when he had boasted that he had killed Kemp, but that some other, unknown person had committed the murder.[10] Lucas was convicted of murder, and sentenced to hang.[11]

Lucas's attorneys filed an appeal, and the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.[12][e]

Supreme Court

[edit]
Justice Shiras, author of the Court's opinion

Justice George Shiras, Jr. delivered the opinion of the Court.[14] Although the Court agreed that Kemp was not a Choctaw Freedman and therefore not a member of the tribe, it held that Judge Parker had erred.[15] The trial court should not have presumed that Kemp was not a member of the tribe, the government should have been required to prove that element in order to establish jurisdiction.[16] Shiras noted that §§ 2145–2146, Revised Statutes,[17] stated that the federal courts did not have jurisdiction over Indian on Indian crime where the tribe had a tribal court.[18] He also held that allowing John LeFlore testify as to what Kemp had told him was hearsay and inadmissible.[19] The Court ordered that Lucas be retried, and reversed his conviction.[20] Lucas was then released to the Choctaw Nation for trial.[21]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ The first constitution was adopted in 1826 and was modeled after the United States Constitution, providing for three branches of government. This included a court system.[1]
  2. ^ Lucas was also charged with larceny and had committed assault and battery.[5]
  3. ^ Kemp was described as "half-witted."[7]
  4. ^ The murder was particularly gruesome, Kemp was decapitated and his limbs severed from his body.[9]
  5. ^ Until 1889, Judge Parker heard the appeals of the cases he tried, as the Supreme Court did not hear appeals of capital cases.[13]

References

[edit]

The citations in this article are written in Bluebook style. Please see the talk page for more information.

  1. ^ Devon Abbott Mihesuah, Choctaw Crime and Punishment, 1884-1907 15 (2012).
  2. ^ Treaty with the Choctaw and Chichasaw, Apr. 28, 1866, 14 Stat. 769; Lucas v. United States, 163 U.S. 612 (1896); 2 Indian Affairs: Laws and Treaties 918 (Charles J. Kappler ed., 1904).
  3. ^ Mihesuah, at 8.
  4. ^ Mihesuah, at 63; John Rockwell Snowden, Wayne Tyndall, & David Smith, American Indian Sovereignty and Naturalization: It's a Race Thing, 80 Neb. L. Rev. 171, 210 (2001).
  5. ^ Mihesuah, at 62.
  6. ^ Lucas, 163 U.S. at 612; Angie Debo, The Rise and Fall of the Choctaw Republic 192 (1975); Mihesuah, at 62.
  7. ^ S. W. Harman, Hell on the Border: He Hanged Eighty-eight Men 363 (1898).
  8. ^ Mihesuah, at 63.
  9. ^ Mihesuah, at 63.
  10. ^ Debo, at 192; Harman, at 364.
  11. ^ Lucas, 163 U.S. at 612; Debo, at 192; Mihesuah, at 63.
  12. ^ Mihesuah, at 63-64.
  13. ^ Jeffrey Brandon Morris, Establishing Justice in Middle America: A History of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 37 (2007).
  14. ^ Mihesuah, at 64.
  15. ^ Mihesuah, at 64.
  16. ^ Mihesuah, at 64.
  17. ^ Act of Mar. 3, 1885, 23 Stat. 385 (codified as amended at 18 U.S.C. § 1153).
  18. ^ Mihesuah, at 64-65.
  19. ^ Mihesuah, at 64.
  20. ^ Harman, at 364; Mihesuah, at 66; Territory News, Phoenix (Muskogee, Okla.), Jun. 4, 1896, at 1 (via Newspapers.com Open access icon).
  21. ^ Reversals and Acquittals of Capital Crimes after 1890, National Park Service, n.d. (last visited Aug. 6, 2015).
[edit]