Jump to content

Tau (2π)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jwelby (talk | contribs) at 09:10, 14 March 2012 (→‎Distant past: Added link to Archimedes.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Some special angles in radians

Tau (τ) is a mathematical constant equal to the ratio of any circle's circumference to its radius, and has a value of approximately 6.2831853.[1] This number also appears in many common formulas, often because it is the period of some very common functions — sine, cosine, eix, and others that involve trips around the unit circle.[2] However, instead of having its own symbol, it has historically been written as 2π.[3] Advocates for τ argue that radius is more fundamental to circles than diameter, and therefore, that τ (circumference divided by radius) is more fundamental than π (circumference divided by diameter).[4] They think this makes formulas written in terms of τ express the mathematics more clearly than with π.[5] Tau's proponents consider radius more fundamental for the following reasons:

  • A circle is defined as all points in a plane a certain distance — the radius — away from a center point.
  • Standard circle formulas use radius:  r2 = (xa)2 + (yb)2  or  x = a+rcosty = b+rsint
  • The unit circle — note the word unit — has a radius of 1, not a diameter of 1.
  • Angles are measured in radians.

Opponents dispute claims that τ (or alternatively, 2π) occurs more commonly than π across mathematics in general.[6] Rather, they say τ is just more common in some fields, and π more common in others. They argue that tau's supporters have focused exclusively on lower-level (grade school to undergraduate) mathematics, which make up only a portion of mathematics in general. Since dividing by 2 is usually considered more complicated — both to perform and to write — than multiplying by 2, the simplicity lost replacing π with the fraction τ/2 in one formula is greater than the simplicity gained replacing 2π with τ in one formula.


Geometry

Angles and radians

  • One radian, the fundamental unit of angle measurement, is the angle a one-radius-length arc subtends on a circle. So the number of radians in a full circle equals the number of one-radius-length arcs around a circle, which is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its radius. This is the definition of τ.
  • Since τ radians covers a full circle, 1/2τ radians covers 1/2 a circle, 3/4τ radians covers 3/4 a circle, and so on. Converting in the opposite direction, 1/2 a circle has an angle measuring 1/2τ radians, 3/4 a circle has an angle measuring 3/4τ radians, and so on. So the fraction does not change when converting in either direction.
  • By comparison, 1/2π radians covers 1/4 a circle, 3/4π radians covers 3/8 a circle, and so on. Converting in the opposite direction, 1/2 a circle has an angle measuring 2/2π = π radians, 3/4 a circle has an angle measuring 6/4π = 3/2π radians, and so on. With π, the fraction does change, either multiplying or dividing by 2, depending on the direction of conversion. So using π instead of τ imposes two extra steps, first deciding whether the fraction must be multiplied or divided by 2, then actually doing the multiplication or division.
  • The so-called "special angles" that need to be memorized when using simply become fractions of a whole circle when using , e.g. , , , and . It is easier to explain that one eighth of a circle corresponds to radians than to radians.[7] Hartl describes the use of in this context as a "pedagogical disaster".

Circles, arcs and sectors

  • The circle circumference formula simplifies to .
  • The circle area formula becomes the more complex, but more standard[2] .
  • With , both the circumference and area formulas for a circle have forms identical to the arclength and area formulas for a circular sector; with , neither formula does. A whole circle is just a circle sector with , so students could memorize just two formulas instead of four.[2]
  • The base    and area    formulas for a skinny triangle also have those forms.  They can be used to derive the    or    formula pairs above by cutting a sector or circle into many pizza-style slices and approximating those slices as skinny triangles.  The sum of the triangles' vertex angles    equals    or    so the sum of their bases    equals    or    and the sum of their areas    equals    or    [2]
circumference and area of a circle.
arclength and area of a circular sector.
base and area of a skinny triangle.
In physics there are many other examples of this pattern of two important formulas, (1) a constant times a variable, and (2) its integral which is times the constant times the variable squared. [1]
velocity and displacement after constant acceleration (starting from rest) angular velocity and angular displacement after constant angular acceleration (starting from rest)
momentum and kinetic energy angular momentum and rotational energy
spring force applied and spring potential energy torque applied and torsion pendulum potential energy
electric flux density and electric field energy density capacitor charge and energy stored
magnetic flux density and magnetic field energy density inductor flux and energy stored

Straight lines and polygons

  • A straight angle (or the sum of the angles in a linear pair[note 1]) describes the angle on only one side of a line, which is π.  The total angle measure on both sides of that line is τ = π + π.
  • When a transversal intersects two parallel lines, the sum of the interior angles on only one side of the transversal is .  The sum of the interior angles on both sides of the transversal is τ = π + π.
  • The sum of the exterior angles of a polygon is .
  • The sum of the interior angles of a triangle is . More generally, the sum of the interior angles of a simple n-gon is . [6]
  • Each (additional) vertex added to a simple polygon increases its total angle sum by τ.  The increase is always divided equally between the internal and outside angle sums.  (outside angle = τ − internal angle  and is not the same as external angle)
Sum of internal angles = nτ/2τ      Sum of outside angles = nτ/2 + τ      Sum of internal angles + Sum of outside angles = nτ
  • Area of a regular n-sided polygon inscribed in the unit circle  

Trigonometry and complex numbers

Functions based on the unit circle

  • The unit circle's circumference is , but its area is . proponents argue that the unit circle's circumference is the more important quantity because it becomes the period of the ubiquitous sine, cosine, and complex exponential functions, while advocates argue that the use of for the area of the unit circle is more elegant.[6]
  • The periodicity of the cosine, sine, and complex exponential functions is τ instead of 2π, which is simpler and arguably more intuitive.[4]
  • The nth roots of unity    for {{{1}}}
  • Cauchy's integral formula  

Euler's Identity

When Euler's Identity is written  , it provides the value of the complex exponential of the circle constant.  So if tau, not pi, is used, then the name Euler's Identity could apply to the even simpler formula  .[1] Although    shows the complex exponential is periodic with period τ,    does show more—that the complex exponential is antiperiodic with antiperiod π[6] (which also logically implies it is periodic with period 2π = τ).
The sum of the nth roots of unity is zero    for n ≥ 2.  The n = 2 case of this identity    is just Euler's Identity, but with 2π/2 instead of π  .  Tau replaces 2π to produce    which, unlike  , contains the number 2.[2]  In " is Wrong!", Bob Palais defended this as adding "one more fundamental constant" to Euler's Identity (though he endorsed as well).[4]
The sum of the complex conjugates of the nth roots of unity is also zero for n ≥ 2.  Similar analysis to that above produces the identity  .  It has all four basic arithmetic operations in "standard" order  ;  the numbers    in order; and    in alphabetical order.[2] As with the changes to Euler's Identity, these issues are not very (and some not at all) important mathematically, but many people have said they dislike tau because they are fond of Euler's Identity (as currently written with pi) for similar reasons. Therefore they may have a non-trivial effect on whether tau replaces pi.

Waves, angular frequency, and the Fourier transform

  • Wavenumber 
  • Angular frequency 
  • Frequencies may be more recognisable in the (most common time-periodic) functions sin t, cos t, and .
For example sin (876.89 t) is immediately recognizable as an 876.89 Hz sine wave while sin (1753.78 t) is not.
For sums of harmonic terms (like Fourier series), identifying which term is the 6th harmonic is quicker and less error-prone when they're written    instead of  .
  • Reduced Planck constant 
  • Inductor impedance      (where represents the imaginary unit usually represented by )
  • Capacitor impedance 

Fourier transform, using ordinary frequency

  • Fourier transform 
  • Inverse Fourier transform 
Common Fourier transform pairs containing 2π = τ

Fourier transform, using angular frequency, unitary

  • Fourier transform 
  • Inverse Fourier transform 

Fourier transform, using angular frequency, non-unitary

  • Fourier transform     (Unchanged; does not use Pi or Tau.)
  • Inverse Fourier transform 

Other areas of mathematics

  • Gaussian distribution
  • Stirling's approximation  
  • 2π theorem
  • The Feynman point, the improbable (0.08%[8]) early occurrence in π of six consecutive 9's starting just 762 digits after the decimal point, becomes even more improbable (0.008%) in τ as seven consecutive 9's starting just 761 digits after the decimal point.[5][9]

History

Distant past

  • Islamic mathematicians like al-Kashi (c. 1380–1429) focused on the circle constant 6.283... although they were fully aware of the work of Archimedes focusing on the circle constant that is nowadays called .[5]
  • William Oughtred used π/δ to represent perimeter/diameter.[4]
  • David Gregory used π/ρ to represent perimeter/radius.[4]
  • William Jones first used π as it is used today to represent perimeter/diameter.
  • Leonhard Euler adopted this use of π and popularized it.
  • Paul Matthieu Hermann Laurent, though never explaining why, treated 2π as if it were a single symbol in Traité D'Algebra by consistently not simplifying expressions like 2π/4 to π/2.[5][3]
  • Fred Hoyle, in Astronomy, A history of man's investigation of the universe, proposed using centiturns (hundredths of a turn) and milliturns (thousandths of a turn) as units for angles.[5]

Recent

  • Joseph Lindenberg; Universally Significant Numbers
  • Bob Palais; Pi Is Wrong!
  • Peter Harremoës; Al-Kashi’s constant τ
  • Michael Hartl; The Tau Manifesto
  • Following the tradition of Pi Day (March 14, or 3.14), "2pi day" has been celebrated[10][11][12] on June 28 (6.28), and became more widely adopted (as "tau day") since the publication of Hartl's manifesto in 2010. It has been argued that this is a "perfect day" because 6 and 28 are the two first perfect numbers.[1][13][14]

Choice of a symbol

Many symbols have been suggested for the proposed circle constant, including:

  • , by Lindenberg
  • ("pi with 3 legs"), by Palais
  • or (variant pi), by Harremoës
  • , by Hartl (to stand for turn or τόρνος (tornos), since τ radians are equivalent to one full turn).

Tau has become the most popular choice for the constant, but opponents argue that the letter τ has many other unrelated mathematical meanings. Supporters on the other hand state that precisely the fact that several meanings already coexist for both τ and π suggests that this is not problematic.

Notes

  1. ^ Linear pairs are supplementary, which means that the sum of the angles of a linear pair is 180 degrees, or radians.

References

  1. ^ a b c d Hartl, Michael. "The Tau Manifesto". Retrieved 9 July 2011.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Lindenberg, Joseph. "Tau Before It Was Cool". Retrieved 16 September 2011.
  3. ^ a b Palais, Robert. "Pi is Wrong!". Retrieved 15 March 2011.
  4. ^ a b c d e Palais, Robert (2001). "π Is Wrong!" (PDF). The Mathematical Intelligencer. 23 (3): 7–8. Retrieved 2011-07-03.
  5. ^ a b c d e Harremoes, Peter. "Al-Kashi's constant τ". Retrieved 9 July 2011.
  6. ^ a b c d Cavers, Michael (4 July 2011). "The Pi Manifesto". Retrieved 2011-09-04.
  7. ^ Wolchover, Natalie (29 June 2011). "Mathematicians Want to Say Goodbye to Pi". Life's Little Mysteries. Retrieved 2011-07-03.
  8. ^ Arndt, J.; Haenel, C. (2001), Pi — Unleashed, Berlin: Springer, p. 3, ISBN 3540665722 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help).
  9. ^ Michael Hartl. "100,000 digits of τ". Retrieved 6 July 2011.
  10. ^ Lance Fortnow and William Gasarch (1 July 2009). "2pi-day? Other holiday possibilities!". Computational Complexity. Retrieved 2011-07-24. {{cite web}}: External link in |author= (help)
  11. ^ Mathematics (28 June 2009). "2pi Day". Facebook. Retrieved 2011-07-24. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help); External link in |author= (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  12. ^ Gerald Thurman (author) (6 July 2009). Eating Pie in Pie Town on Two Pi Day (flv) (YouTube).
  13. ^ Marcus du Sautoy (1 July 2009). "Perfect Numbers". The Times. Archived from the original on 2011-08-12. Retrieved 2011-08-12.
  14. ^ Dave Richeson (1 July 2009). "Last Sunday was a perfect day". Division by Zero. Retrieved 2011-07-24.