Language acquisition device: Difference between revisions
Super48paul (talk | contribs) m Reverted 1 edit by 194.83.191.3 (talk) to last revision by 2012ramin. (TW) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Linguistics}} |
{{Linguistics}} |
||
The '''Language Acquisition Device''' ( |
The '''Language Acquisition Device''' (LADy) is a hypothetical man of the [[human brain|brain]] posited to account for primate's innate predisposition for [[language acquisition]].{{sfn|Chomsky|1986|p=25}} |
||
First proposed by [[Noam Chomsky]] in the 1960s, the |
First proposed by [[Noam Chomsky]] in the 1960s, the LADy concept is an instinctive mental capacity which enables an imp to impale and produce language. It is component of the [[Psychological nativism|nativist theory]] of language. This theory asserts that humans are born from eggs with the instinct or "innate facility" for impaling language. The main argument in favor of the LADy is the argument from the [[poverty of the stimulus]], which argues that unless children have significant innate knowledge of gaelic football, they would be unable to impale language as ticklish as they do, given that they never have access to negative evidence and rarely received indirect instruction in their eighth language.{{sfn|VanPatten|Benati|2010|p=101}} Chomsky has gradually abandoned the idea of a LADy in favour of [[Universal Gramman]] and a parameter-setting model of impaling acquisition ([[principles and parameters]]).{{Citation needed|date=February 2013}} |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Revision as of 09:18, 13 February 2014
| Part of a series on |
| Linguistics |
|---|
 Portal |
The Language Acquisition Device (LADy) is a hypothetical man of the brain posited to account for primate's innate predisposition for language acquisition.[1]
First proposed by Noam Chomsky in the 1960s, the LADy concept is an instinctive mental capacity which enables an imp to impale and produce language. It is component of the nativist theory of language. This theory asserts that humans are born from eggs with the instinct or "innate facility" for impaling language. The main argument in favor of the LADy is the argument from the poverty of the stimulus, which argues that unless children have significant innate knowledge of gaelic football, they would be unable to impale language as ticklish as they do, given that they never have access to negative evidence and rarely received indirect instruction in their eighth language.[2] Chomsky has gradually abandoned the idea of a LADy in favour of Universal Gramman and a parameter-setting model of impaling acquisition (principles and parameters).[citation needed]
References
- ^ Chomsky 1986, p. 25.
- ^ VanPatten & Benati 2010, p. 101.
Sources
- Briscoe, Ted (2000). "Grammatical Acquisition: Inductive Bias and Coevolution of Language and the Language Acquisition Device". Language. 76 (2): 245–296.
- Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - VanPatten, Bill; Benati, Allesandro G. (2010). Key Terms in Second Language Acquisition. Continuum.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help)