Jump to content

Kish (Sumer)

Coordinates: 32°32′25″N 44°36′17″E / 32.54028°N 44.60472°E / 32.54028; 44.60472
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Kishite language)
Kish
Kish is located in Iraq
Kish
Kish
Shown within Iraq
LocationTell al-Uhaymir, Babil Governorate, Iraq
RegionMesopotamia
Coordinates32°32′25″N 44°36′17″E / 32.54028°N 44.60472°E / 32.54028; 44.60472
TypeSettlement
History
FoundedUbaid period
PeriodsUbaid to Hellenistic
Site notes
Excavation dates1852, 1912, 1923–1933, 1989, 2000–2001
ArchaeologistsAusten Henry Layard, Julius Oppert, Henri de Genouillac, Stephen Langdon, Hideo Fuji, Ken Matsumoto

Kish (Sumerian: Kiš; Kiški; cuneiform: 𒆧𒆠;[1] Akkadian: Kiššatu,[2] near modern Tell al-Uhaymir) is an important archaeological site in Babil Governorate (Iraq), located 80 km (50 mi) south of Baghdad and 12 km (7.5 mi) east of the ancient city of Babylon. The Ubaid period site of Ras al-Amiyah is 8 km (5.0 mi) away. It was occupied from the Ubaid period to the Hellenistic period.[3] In Early Dynastic times the city's patron deity was Ishtar with her consort Ea. Her temple, at Tell Ingharra, was (E)-hursag-kalama.[4][5] By Old Babylonian times the patron deities had become Zababa, along with his consort, the goddess Bau and Istar. His temple Emeteursag (later Ekišiba) was at Uhaimir.[6]

History

[edit]
The ancient cities of Sumer.

Kish was occupied from the Ubaid period (c.5300–4300 BC), gaining prominence as one of the pre-eminent powers in the region during the Early Dynastic Period when it reached its maximum extent of 230 hectares.[7][8]

3rd Millennium BC

[edit]

The Sumerian King List (SKL) states that Kish was the first city to have kings following the deluge.[9] The 1st dynasty of Kish begins with Ĝushur. Ĝushur's successor is called Kullassina-bel, but this is actually a sentence in Akkadian meaning "All of them were lord". Thus, some scholars have suggested that this may have been intended to signify the absence of a central authority in Kish for a time. The names of the next nine kings of Kish preceding Etana are Nanĝišlišma, En-tarah-ana, Babum, Puannum, Kalibum, Kalumum, Zuqaqip, Aba, Mašda, and Arwium. Archaeological finds from the Uruk period indicate that the site was part of the Uruk Expansion and hence originally Sumerian language speaking.[10] Ignace Gelb identified Kish as the center of the earliest East Semitic culture which he calls the Kish civilization, however the concept has been challenged by more recent scholarship.[11][12]

Of the twenty-first king of Kish on the list, Enmebaragesi, who is said to have captured the weapons of Elam, is the first name confirmed by archaeological finds from his reign.[4] He is also known through other literary references, in which he and his son Aga of Kish are portrayed as contemporary rivals of Dumuzid, the Fisherman, and Gilgamesh, early rulers of Uruk.

Some early kings of Kish are known through archaeology, but are not named on the SKL. It can be difficult to determine if these are actually rulers of Kish or had merely adopted the common appellation "King of Kish". This includes Mesilim, who built temples in Adab and Lagash, where he seems to have exercised some control. Two other examples were the sleeve of an Early Dynatic II bronze sword found at Girsu which read "Lugal-namni[r]-sum (is) king of Kis" and a statue fragment found at Nippur which read "Enna-il, king of Kis".[4][13]

Mesannepada, Lugal Kish-ki (𒈩𒀭𒉌𒅆𒊒𒁕 𒈗 𒆧𒆠), "Mesannepada, King of Kish", on a seal impression found in the Royal Cemetery at Ur.[14][15] The last column of characters, is thought to mean "his wife..." (𒁮𒉡𒍼, dam-nu-gig).[14]

After its early supremacy, Kish declined economically and militarily, but retained a strong political and symbolic significance.[16] Its influence reached as far west as the city of Ebla near the Mediterranean Sea, as shown by the Ebla tablets.[17][18] According to the Ebla tablets, Kish was defeated in the time of Ebla ruler Ishar-Damu, probably by Uruk. Shortly afterward Kish joined Ebla in defeating Mari, followed by the marriage of the Eblan princess Keshdut to a king of Kish.[19] Just as with Nippur to the south, control of Kish was a prime element in legitimizing dominance over the north of Mesopotamia. Because of the city's symbolic value, strong rulers later claimed the traditional title "King of Kish", even if they were from Akkad, Ur, Assyria, Isin, Larsa or Babylon.[20] One of the earliest to adopt this title upon subjecting Kish to his empire was King Mesannepada of Ur.[21]

Sargon of Akkad, the founder of the Akkadian Empire, came from the area near Kish, called Azupiranu according to a much later Neo-Assyrian text purporting to be an autobiography of Sargon.[22]

Macehead inscription of Manishtushu, ruler of the Akkadian Empire: Manishtushu Lugal Kish, "Manishtushu King of Kish"

Old Babylonian period

[edit]

By the early part of the First Dynasty of Babylon Kish was under the control of Babylon with the tenth year name of ruler Sumu-abum (c. 1897–1883 BC) being "Year in which (Sumu-abum) made for Kish its city wall (reaching) heaven" (repeated in following year). Not long afterward, Kish was conquered by Sumuel of Larsa as reflected in his eleventh year name "Year the army of Kisz was smitten by weapons", repeated in the following three year names. In the 13th year of Sumu-la-El he reports destroying Kish (repeated in following four years) and then destroying the city wall of Kish in his 19th year and in his 30th year "Year the temple of Zababa, the Emeteursag / the house, ornament of the heros (Zababa), was built". At this point Kish came under the control of the city-state of Eshnunna under rulers DIpiq-Adad II and DNaram-Sin. By the time of Babylon ruler Sin-Muballit (c. 1813–1792 BC), father of Hammurabi, Kish was firmly under the control of Babylon and would stay that way until the waning days of the First Dynasty of Babylon. The rulers of Babylon at its peak of power, Hammurabi and Samsu-iluna, are known to have done extensive construction at Kish, including rebuilding the city wall. By this time, the eastern settlement at Hursagkalama had become viewed as a distinct city, and it was probably not included in the walled area.[10]

At some period or periods within the Old Babylonian period, Kish was under the control of a series of rulers generally called the Manana Dynasty. Most of what is known comes from two illicitly excavated archive thought to be from the town of Damrum, near Kish.[23][24][25] These rulers include Iawian, Halium, Abdi-Erah, Manana, and four others. Several year names of Iawium are known including "Year Sumu-ditana died". Samsu-Ditana was the last ruler of the First Dynasty of Babylon.[26] One ruler, Ashduniarim is known from a long inscription on a clay foundation cone found at Kish.

"Ašdũni-iarīm, the mighty man, beloved of Ištar, favored by Zababa, king of Kiš, when the world quarters four became hostile to me, for eight years battle I waged, and in the eighth year my opponent to clay indeed turned. ... "[27]

Later history

[edit]

The succeeding Kassite dynasty moved the capital from Babylon to Dur-Kurigalzu and Kish was diminished. There is some evidence of Kassite activity in Kish.[28] Afterward Kish appears to have significantly declined in importance, as it is only mentioned in a few documents from the later second millennium BC. During the Neo-Assyrian and Neo-Babylonian periods, Kish is mentioned more frequently in texts. However, by this time, Kish proper (Tell al-Uhaymir) had been almost completely abandoned, and the settlement which texts from this period call "Kish" was probably Hursagkalama (Tell Ingharra).[10]

After the Achaemenid period, Kish completely disappears from the historical record; however, archaeological evidence indicates that the town remained in existence for a long time thereafter.[10] Although the site at Tell al-Uhaymir was mostly abandoned, Tell Ingharra was revived during the Parthian period, growing into a sizeable town with a large mud-brick fortress. During the Sasanian period, the site of the old city was completely abandoned in favor of a string of connected settlements spread out along both sides of the Shatt en-Nil canal. This last incarnation of Kish prospered under Sasanian and then Islamic rule, before being finally abandoned during the later years of the Abbasid Caliphate (750–1258).[10]

Archaeology

[edit]

Kish is located 12 km (7.5 mi) east of the ancient city of Babylon and 80 km (50 mi) south of modern Baghdad. The Kish archaeological site is an oval area roughly 8 by 3 km (5 by 2 mi), transected into east and west sections by the dry former bed of the Euphrates River, encompassing around 40 mounds scattered over an area of about 24 square kilometers, the largest being Uhaimir and Ingharra.[29]

Iraq. Kish. (Tel-Uhaimir). Ruins of Kish at time of excavation

After irregularly excavated tablets began appearing at the beginning of the twentieth century, François Thureau-Dangin identified the site as being Kish.[30] Those tablets ended up in a variety of museums. Because of its close proximity to Babylon (of which early explorers believed it was part) the site was visited by a number of explorers and travelers in the 19th century, some involving excavation, most notably by the foreman of Hormuzd Rassam who dug there with a crew of 20 men for a number of months. Austen Henry Layard and also Julius Oppert dug some trenches there in the early 1852 though the finds were lost in the Qurnah Disaster. None of this early work was published. The name of the site as Kish was determined by George Smith in 1872 based on an inscribed brick of Adad-apla-iddina which had been discovered 60 years before. A French archaeological team under Henri de Genouillac excavated at Tell Uhaimir for three months in January 1912, finding some 1,400 Old Babylonian tablets which were distributed to the Istanbul Archaeology Museum and the Louvre. He also excavated at a Neo-Babylonian monumental building on Tell Ingharra. At Tell Bander he uncovered Parthian materials.[31][32]

Later, a joint Field Museum and University of Oxford team under Stephen Langdon excavated from 1923 to 1933, with the recovered materials split between Chicago and the Ashmolean Museum at Oxford. Seventeen different mounds were excavated but the main focus of the excavations was at Tell Ingharra and Tell Uhaimir.[33][34][35][36][37][38][39] The actual excavations at Tell Uhaimir were led initially by E. MacKay and later by L. C. Watelin. Work on the faunal and flora remains was conducted by Henry Field.[40][41][42] Even by the standards of the day, the documentation of this excavation (findspots provenance etc.), were sorely lacking. This was compounded by the death of the principals within a few years and the beginning of World War II. In recent decades there has been a major effort to recreate the data from all the old field notes and finds.[43][44] A bone awl from Phase 2 in the YWN area, the transition between Early Dynastic and Akkadian periods, was accelerator radiocarbon dated to 2471–2299 BC (3905 ± 27 C14 years BP).[45]

A surface survey of Kish and the area around it was conducted in 1966–1967. It showed that there were villages at Uhaimir and Ingharra in the Ubaid and Protoliterate periods. These expanded into two cites in ED I and reached a peak in Ed III with Ingharra becoming the larger city at that time. The site was lightly occupied in the Akkadian period with modest towns on Ingharra and Mound W. During Ur III, Isin-Larsa, and Old Babylonian times there was a revival mostly centered around Uhaimir. The later half of the 2nd millennium BC showed light occupation, all on Mound W. In the Neo-Babylonian period the rivercourse shifted from north to west, with Uhaimir having a large temple with associated fort, a major temple on Ingharra, and a major town on Mound W. The Achaemenid/Seleucid settlement was limited to the western end of Uhaimir. The Parthian and Sassanian periods showed light occupation, except for Tell Bandar.[10] As part of this survey soundings were made at Umm-el-Jir (the site named Umm el-Jerab that Oriental Institute had found Old Akkadian tablets in 1932) 27 kilometers from Kish.[46]

More recently, a Japanese team from the Kokushikan University led by Hideo Fuji and Ken Matsumoto excavated at Tell Uhaimir in 1989–89, 2000, and 2001. The final season lasted only one week. Work was focused mainly on Tell A with some time spent at the plano-convex building.[47][48][49]

In February 2022 Iraqi archaeaologists conducted Ground Penetrating Radar and Electrical Resistivity scans of a test 30 meter by 30 meter section at Kish.[50][51]

In the Chicago expedition to Kish in 1923–1933, several other sections are included:

  • Tell Ingharra – Twin ziggurats and Neo-Babylonian Temple Complex.
  • Area P: Located in the Northern part of Kish which the Plano-convex Building resided
  • Mound A, which includes a palace and a cemetery
  • Tell H, identified roughly as "The Sasanian Settlement"[37]

Tell Uhaimir

[edit]

This site consists of three subtells (T, X, and Z). Tell Z was the location of one of the main ziggurats and where temples had been built and rebuilt from the Old Babylonian to the Neo-Babylonian periods. At Tell X a 1st Millennium BC fort was uncovered and at Tell T some Old Babylonian structures were found. Between Uhaimir and Ingharra are three smaller tells and further east Tell W where Neo-Assyrian tablets as well as an entire Neo-Babylonian archive was found consisting of about 1000 tablets.

Tell Ingharra

[edit]

Located in the eastern side of the ancient Kish, Tell Ingharra was extensively explored during the Chicago excavation and provided the best known archaeological sequence in the 3rd millennium BC site. The site consists of several subtells (A, B, D, E, F, G, H, and Tell Bandar which is made up of Tells C and V).[52][53] In particular, the 1923 excavation concentrated heavily on mound E with its twin ziggurats, while the roughly 130 meter square Neo-Babylonian temple, built on an Early Dynastic plano-copnvex platform, was one of the two buildings that was properly described in a published report.[37]

The twin ziggurats were built of small plano-convex bricks in a herringbone fashion on the summit of Tell Ingharra. The larger one is located on the south-west side of the temple and the smaller one on the south-east side.[37] The excavation report mainly focused on the larger ziggurat while there had been only one report on the smaller one by Mackay. Based on the findings from the larger ziggurat, it is suggested that the structures were built at the end of the Early Dynastic IIIa period to commemorate the city.[52] The fascination of the ziggurats was interesting to the excavators as it was the only Early Dynastic structure that was not destroyed or obscured by later reconstructions, which was why it provided valuable evidence of that time period.[37]

As for the temple complex, the findings of the temple had determined that the mound was part of the city of Hursagkalama. It was used as an active religious centre until after 482 BC. They also had identified the builder as Nabonidus or Nebuchadnezzar II based on the bricks with inscriptions and barrel cylinder fragments reported in the temple.[37]

An Early Dynastic I/IIIa cemetery extended to the south towards Mound A with a number of high status graves containing multiple burials and carts drawn by equids or bovids and are considered as predecessors to the royal burials at Ur.[54]

Area P

[edit]
3-D reconstruction of the Plano-convex building (north-east view) by Hmlam

This area, north of tell W, was unearthed during the second excavation season (1923–1924) led by Mackay, which uncovered the 'Plano-convex building' (PCB).[55][56] But outstanding discoveries in Palace A rapidly overshadowed the contemporary excavation here, and the building remained partially uncovered.[55]

Revealed by its stratigraphy and pottery assemblage was the existence of three distinct architectural phases.[55] The earliest archaeological occupation dates back to the ED II period.[55] Above it, rested the massive ED III construction – the PCB. Multiple rooms in the PCB exhibited layers of ashes and charcoals with arrowheads and copper blades, attested that the PCB suffered significant destruction twice during the late ED III period.[56] After its destruction, the PCB was abandoned.[8][55][56] Located above later floors of the PCB were scattered burials during the Akkadian period.[47][56]

The 'Plano-convex building'

[edit]
3-D reconstruction of the Plano-convex building (bird's eye view) by Hmlam

The Plano-convex building was a fortified construction built extensively with plano-convex bricks.[55][56] It displayed the socio-economic dynamics at Kish during the ED III period.[56] No characteristic linking the building to a religious construct.[37] Instead, the Plano-convex building is recognized as a public building associated with the economical production of beer, textile and oil.[56] The PCB might have also housed the administrative center powered by the elites.[56] First recognized by Margueron, scholars have divided the building into four main sectors based on the architectural layout:[56]

  • Sector A: Production area
  • Sector B: Inconclusive but arguably an administration area
  • Sector C: Unknown but exhibit a high degree of segregation
  • Sector D: Private, domestic area for housing activities

Mound A

[edit]

Mound A, which includes a cemetery and an Early Dynastic III palace, was discovered during 1922–1925 excavations conducted by Ernest Mackay, under the Field Museum and Oxford University.[57][53] Although it was earlier a part of the Ingharra mounds lying about 70 meters to the north, it is now separated by an alluvial valley. The seals and other artifacts found in the graves, dating back to a later age than the palace, show that the site was used as a cemetery from the end of the Early Dynastic period until the early Akkadian Empire period.[58][57][59][60][61]

The Sumerian Palace

[edit]

The palace, which was unearthed beneath the mound, had fallen into decay and was used as a burial ground during Early Dynastic III. It comprises three sections – the original building, the eastern wing and stairway, and the annex. The original building, which was composed of unbaked plano-convex bricks (23 × 15 × 3.5–6 cm), had extremely thick walls, while the annex, which was added later to the south of the building, had comparatively thinner walls. A 2.30 m wide passage was constructed within the outer wall of the original building to prevent invaders from entering the structure.[62]

The archaeological findings within the palace lack pottery items, the most remarkable among them was a fragment of slate and limestone inlay work, which represents the scene of a king punishing a prisoner.[62]

3-D reconstruction of Sumerian Palace (Mound A) by Pahuna/ Pahuna99
3-D reconstruction of Sumerian Palace (Mound A) by Pahuna/ Pahuna99

Tell H

[edit]
3-D reconstruction of Tell H, SP-2 by OceanOwll

In the 1923–1933 Expedition, Tell H became the focus of its final three seasons (1930–1933). For personal reasons of the excavators, the Kish material in this section remained selective, mainly yielding Sasanian pottery, coins, incantation bowls and so on.[37][38] The dating of this section crossed a range of periods, with layer upon layer built on the site. Evidence shows that in the Early Dynastic III Period, there once even existed a twin city.[8] Therefore, the city occupies a relatively unsettled presence in chronology. But from the excavation, eight buildings were identified as from the Sasanian period, thus making this place primarily identified as the Sasanian Settlement. Researchers suspect that some of the buildings might function together as a complex serving different purposes, including royal residence, storage, and administration.[37]

3-D reconstruction of Tell H, SP-3 by OceanOwll

The most prominent finding is the stucco decoration in the first two buildings, while the 1923–1933 team also figured out the floor plan and architectural structure of others. It was partly through these stucco decorations that researchers identified the royal resident to be Bahram V (420–438 AD)—Sasanian kings had their distinctive crowns separately, and the unique crown pattern on stucco served as evidence to support this argument. In Kish, which once functioned as a transfer station between Ctesiphon and Hira, Bahram V built palaces for summer entertainment, which explains why one of the buildings has a huge water tank in the middle, probably functioning to cool down the court in summers. Around Bahram V's palaces, a group of Sasanian people also took residence and developed a system of settlement and commercial activities.[37]

List of rulers

[edit]

The Sumerian King List (SKL) lists only 39 rulers among four dynasties of Kish. A fifth dynasty is known and it was an Amorite dynasty unnamed on the SKL. The following list should not be considered complete:

# Depiction Ruler Succession Epithet Approx. dates Notes
Early Dynastic I period (c. 2900 – c. 2650 BC)
First dynasty of Kish / Kish I dynasty (c. 2900 – c. 2650 BC)

"After the flood had swept over, and the kingship had descended from heaven, the kingship was in Kish."

— Sumerian King List (SKL)
1st Jushur
𒄑𒃡
fl.c. 2900 BC
(1,200 years)
  • Names before Etana do not appear in any other known source, and their existence is archaeologically unverified
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Historicity uncertain
2nd Kullassina-bel
𒄢𒆷𒍣𒈾𒁁𒂖𒃻
Uncertain
(960 years)
  • The name is believed to be a Kishite phrase meaning, "All of them (were) lord", which may denote a period of no central authority in the early period of Kish
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Historicity uncertain
3rd Nangishlishma
𒄢𒆷𒍣𒈾𒁁𒂖
Uncertain
(670 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
4th En-tarah-ana
𒂗𒁰𒀭𒈾
Uncertain
(420 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
5th Babum
𒁀𒁍𒌝
Uncertain
(300 years)
  • The name is believed to be a Kishite word for "gate"
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Historicity uncertain
6th Puannum
𒁍𒀭𒉡𒌝
Uncertain
(840 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Historicity uncertain
7th Kalibum
𒂵𒉌𒁍𒌝
Uncertain
(960 years)
  • The name is believed to be a Kishite word for "hound"
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Historicity uncertain
8th Kalumum
𒅗𒇻𒈬𒌝
Uncertain
(840 years)
  • The name is believed to be a Kishite word for "lamb"
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Historicity uncertain
9th Zuqaqip
𒅗𒂵𒄄𒅁
Uncertain
(900 years)
  • The name is believed to be a Kishite word for "scorpion"
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Historicity uncertain
10th Atab
𒀉𒋰
Uncertain
(600 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
11th Mashda
𒈦𒆕𒆤
Son of Atab Uncertain
(840 years)
  • The name is believed to be a Kishite word for "gazelle"
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Historicity uncertain
12th Arwium
𒅈𒉿𒌑𒌝
Son of Mashda Uncertain
(720 years)
  • The name is believed to be a Kishite word for "male gazelle"
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Historicity uncertain
13th Etana
𒂊𒋫𒈾
"the shepherd, who ascended to heaven and consolidated all the foreign countries" reigned c. 2800 BC
(1,500 years)
  • Known from the Babylonian Myth of Etana
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Historicity uncertain
14th Balih
𒁀𒇷𒄴
Son of Etana Uncertain
(400 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
15th En-me-nuna
𒂗𒈨𒉣𒈾
Uncertain
(660 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
16th Melem-Kish
𒈨𒉈𒆧𒆠
Son of En-me-nuna Uncertain
(900 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain

"1,560 are the years of the dynasty of En-me-nuna."

— SKL
17th Barsal-nuna
𒁇𒊩𒉣𒈾
Son of En-me-nuna Uncertain
(1,200 years)
  • His name may have meant sheep of the prince. Barsal means sheep
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Historicity uncertain
18th Zamug
𒁾
Son of Barsal-nuna Uncertain
(140 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
19th Tizqar
𒋾𒄑𒃼
Son of Zamug Uncertain
(305 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
20th Ilku
𒅋𒆪𒌑
Uncertain
(900 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
21st Iltasadum
𒅋𒋫𒊓𒁺𒌝
Uncertain
(1,200 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
22nd En-me-barage-si
𒂗𒈨𒁈𒄄𒋛
"who made the land of Elam submit" r. c. 2750 BC
(900 years)
  • Historicity certain[63]
  • The earliest ruler on the SKL confirmed independently from epigraphical evidence and can be historically verified with archaeology
  • temp. of Dumuzid of Uruk
23rd Aga
𒀝𒂵
Son of En-me-barage-si r. c. 2700 BC
(625 years)
  • Son of En-me-barage-si
  • Historicity certain[63]
  • temp. of Gilgamesh of Uruk

"1,525 are the years of the dynasty of En-me-barage-si. 23 kings; they ruled for 24,510 years, 3 months, and 3½ days. Then Kish was defeated and the kingship was taken to Eanna (Uruk)."

— SKL
# Depiction Ruler Succession Epithet Approx. dates Notes
Early Dynastic II period (c. 2650 – c. 2550 BC)
Munushushumgal
𒊩𒃲𒁔
Uncertain; this ruler may have fl.c. 2900 – c. 2500 BC sometime during the ED I, II, and/or IIIa period(s)[63]
  • Historicity certain[63]
  • Father of a king[63]
  • Possibly a king himself[63]
Early Dynastic IIIa period (c. 2550 – c. 2500 BC)
Lugalmen Uncertain; this ruler may have fl.c. 2700 – c. 2500 BC sometime during the ED II and/or IIIa period(s)[63]
  • Historicity certain[63]
Lugalutu
𒈗𒌓
Uncertain; this ruler may have fl.c. 2600 – c. 2500 BC sometime during the ED IIIa period[63]
  • Historicity certain[63]
  • A king of Kish[63]
Menunesi Uncertain; this ruler may have fl.c. 2600 – c. 2500 BC sometime during the EDIIIa period[63]
Uhub
𒌑𒄸
r. c. 2570 BC
  • Historicity certain
  • Known from vase fragments bearing the title "Governor of Kish"
Mesilim
𒈨𒁲
r. c. 2550 BC
# Depiction Ruler Succession Epithet Approx. dates Notes
Early Dynastic IIIb period (c. 2500 – c. 2350 BC)
Second dynasty of Kish / Kish II dynasty (c. 2500 – c. 2430 BC)

"Then Awan was defeated and the kingship was taken to Kish."

— SKL
1st Susuda
𒁻𒋢𒆳𒊒𒁕
"the fuller" r. c. 2500 BC
(201 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
Aya'anzud
𒀀𒀭𒅎𒂂𒄷
Uncertain; these two rulers may have fl.c. 2500 – c. 2470 BC sometime during the EDIIIb period.[63]
  • Historicity certain.
  • temp. of Ur-Nanshe of Lagash
Ennail
𒂗𒈾𒅋
Zuzu
𒍪𒍪
r. c. 2470 BC
2nd Dadasig
𒁕𒁕𒋝
Uncertain
(81 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
3rd Mamagal
𒈣𒈣𒃲
"the boatman" Uncertain
(360 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
4th Kalbum
𒅗𒀠𒁍𒌝
Son of Mamagal Uncertain
(195 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
5th Tuge
𒌆𒂊
Uncertain
(300 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
6th Men-nuna
𒃞𒉣𒈾
Son of Tuge Uncertain
(180 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
7th Lugalngu
𒂗𒉈𒀹𒁯
r. c. 2450 BC
(290 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
Ibbi-Ea
𒂗𒉈𒀹𒁯
r. c. 2430 BC
(420 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain

"8 kings; they ruled for 3,195 years. Then Kish was defeated and the kingship was taken to Hamazi."

— SKL
# Depiction Ruler Succession Epithet Approx. dates Notes
Third dynasty of Kish / Kish III dynasty (c. 2430 – c. 2360 BC)

"Then Mari was defeated and the kingship was taken to Kish."

— SKL
1st Kug-Bau
𒆬𒀭𒁀𒌑
"the woman tavern-keeper, who made firm the foundations of Kish" r. c. 2400 BC
(100 years)

"1 king; she ruled for 100 years. Then Kish was defeated and the kingship was taken to Akshak."

— SKL
# Depiction Ruler Succession Epithet Approx. dates Notes
Proto-Imperial period (c. 2350 – c. 2334 BC)
Fourth dynasty of Kish / Kish IV dynasty (c. 2360 – c. 1897 BC)
8th Enbi-Ishtar
𒂗𒉈𒀹𒁯
Uncertain
(290 years)
  • Historicity certain
  • Appears on a version of the SKL as one of the last kings of the Kish II dynasty; however, his reign may have immediately preceded that of Ur-Zababa from the Kish III and/or IV dynasty[63]
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of "king" of not just Kish; but, all of Sumer

"Then the reign of Akshak was abolished and the kingship was taken to Kish."

— SKL
1st Puzur-Suen
𒅤𒊭𒀭𒂗𒍪
Son of Kug-bau r. c. 2360 BC
(25 years)
  • Son of Kug-bau
  • Appears on a version of the SKL as one of the last kings of the Kish III dynasty
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of "king" of not just Kish; but, all of Sumer
2nd Ur-Zababa
𒌨𒀭𒍝𒂷𒂷
Son of Puzur-Suen r. c. 2340 BC
(6 years)
  • Appears on a version of the SKL as one of the last kings of the Kish III dynasty
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of "king" of not just Kish; but, all of Sumer
  • According to the SKL: Sargon of Akkad was his cup-bearer
Akkadian period (c. 2334 – c. 2154 BC)
3rd Zimudar
𒍣𒈬𒁯
Uncertain
(30 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
4th Usi-watar
𒌑𒍣𒉿𒁯
Son of Zimudar Uncertain
(7 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
5th Eshtar-muti
𒁹𒁯𒈬𒋾
Uncertain
(11 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
6th Ishme-Shamash
𒅖𒈨𒀭𒌓
Uncertain
(11 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
7th Shu-ilishu
𒋗𒉌𒉌𒋗
Uncertain
(15 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
8th Nanniya
𒈾𒀭𒉌𒅀
"the jeweller" Uncertain
(7 years)
  • Said on the SKL to have held the title of, "King" of not just Kish; but, to have held the "Kingship" over all of Sumer
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain

"8 kings; they ruled for 485 years. Then the reign of Kish was abolished and the kingship was returned a third time to Uruk."

— SKL
Iphur-Kish r. c. 2254 BC
  • Historicity certain
  • temp. of Naram-Suen of Akkad
  • A ruler of Kish who led a northern coalition of ten city-states during the Great Revolt against Naram-Suen
# Depiction Ruler Succession Epithet Approx. dates Notes
Isin-Larsa period (c. 2025 – c. 1763 BC)
Manana dynasty (c. 1897 – c. 1847 BC)
Iawian r. c. 1897 BC
Manana r. c. 1888 BC
Halium Uncertain
Abdi-Erah Uncertain
Ahi-marasy Uncertain
Naqimum r. c. 1872 BC
Sumu-iamutbala r. c. 1855 BC
Ashduniarim r. c. 1847 BC
[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature
  2. ^ Electronic Pennsylvania Sumerian Dictionary (EPSD)
  3. ^ wparkinson (2011-01-11). "The Kish Collection". Field Museum. Retrieved 2020-08-20.
  4. ^ a b c Frayne, Douglas R, "KIŠ", in Presargonic Period: Early Periods, Volume 1 (2700-2350 BC), The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia, Vol 1, pp. 49-60, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008 ISBN 9780802035868
  5. ^ Inanna's Descent to the Underworld translation at ETCSL
  6. ^ McEwan, G. J. P., "Late Babylonian Kish", Iraq, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 117–23, 1983
  7. ^ Weiss, Harvey (1975). "Kish, Akkad and Agade". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 95 (3): 434–453. doi:10.2307/599355. JSTOR 599355.
  8. ^ a b c [1] J. "Ur, Kish and the Spatial Organization of Cities in Third-Millennium BC Southern Iraq", pp. 227–239 in Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 71, Chicago: The Oriental Institute, 2021 ISBN 978-1-61491-063-3
  9. ^ [2] Thorkild Jacobsen, "The Sumerian King List", Assyriological Studies 11, Chicago: University of Chricago Press, 1939
  10. ^ a b c d e f [3] Gibson, McGuire, "The City and Area of Kish", Coconut Grove, Miami, Florida, Field Research Projects, 1972
  11. ^ I. J. Gelb, "Mari and the Kish Civilization", in Mari in Retrospect: Fifty Years of Mari and Mari Studies (ed. Gordon D. Young), Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1992
  12. ^ Sommerfeld, Walter (2021). "The 'Kish Civilization'". In Vita, Juan-Pablo (ed.). History of the Akkadian Language. Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 1 The Near and Middle East. Vol. 1. BRILL. pp. 545–547. ISBN 9789004445215. Retrieved 23 February 2022.
  13. ^ Frayne, Douglas R, "Rulers with the Title “King of Kiš” Whose Dynastic Affiliations Are Unknown", in Presargonic Period: Early Periods, Volume 1 (2700-2350 BC), The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia, Vol 1, pp. 67-76, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008 ISBN 9780802035868
  14. ^ a b Hall, H. R. (Harry Reginald); Woolley, Leonard; Legrain, Leon (1900). Ur excavations. Trustees of the Two Museums by the aid of a grant from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. p. 312.
  15. ^ Image of a Mesanepada seal in: Legrain, Léon (1936). Ur Excavations Voulme III Arachaic Seal-impressions (PDF). The Trustees Of The Two Museums By The Aid Of A Grant From The Carnegi Corporation Of New York. p. 44 seal 518 for description, Plate 30, seal 518 for image.
  16. ^ [4] Steinkeller, Piotr., "An Archaic 'Prisoner Plaque' From Kiš.", Revue d'Assyriologie et d'archéologie Orientale, vol. 107, pp. 131–57, 2013
  17. ^ Archi, Alfonso., "More on Ebla and Kiš", in Ebla and Its Archives: Texts, History, and Society, Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 478-496, 2015
  18. ^ Moorey, P. R. S., "Abu Salabikh, Kish, Mari and Ebla: Mid-Third Millennium Archaeological Interconnections.", American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 447–48, 1981
  19. ^ Archi, Alfonso, and Maria Giovanna Biga, "A Victory over Mari and the Fall of Ebla", Journal of Cuneiform Studies 55: 1–44, 2003
  20. ^ Maeda, T., "'King of Kish' in Pre-Sargonic Sumer", Orient 17, pp. 1–17, 1981
  21. ^ Albrecht Goetze, "Early Kings of Kish", Journal of Cuneiform Studies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 105–111, 1961
  22. ^ L. W. King, "Chronicles Concerning Early Babylonian Kings", II, London, pp. 87–96, 1907
  23. ^ de Boer, Rients, "Two early Old Babylonian "Mananâ" archives dated to the last years of Sumu-la-El", Revue d’Assyriologie et d’archéologie Orientale, vol. 111, pp. 25–64, 2017
  24. ^ Simmons, Stephen D., "Early Old Babylonian Tablets from Harmal and Elsewhere (Continued)", Journal of Cuneiform Studies, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 75–87, 1960
  25. ^ Charpin, D., "Recherches sur la “dynastie de Mananâ”: Essai de localisation et de chronologie", RA 72, pp. 13–40, 1978
  26. ^ Yuhong, Wu, and Stephanie Dalley, "The Origins of the Manana Dynasty at Kish, and the Assyrian King List", Iraq, vol. 52, pp. 159–65, 1990
  27. ^ “RIME 4.08.01.01 Composite Artifact Entry.” 2013. Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (CDLI). January 20, 2013. https://cdli.ucla.edu/P448588.
  28. ^ T. Claydon, "Kish in the Kassite Period (c. 1650 – 1150 B.C)", Iraq, vol. 54, pp. 141–155, 1992
  29. ^ [5] Naoko Ohgama, Eleanor Robson, "Scribal schooling in Old Babylonian Kish: the evidence of the Oxford tablets", in Your praise is sweet. A memorial volume for Jeremy Black from students, colleagues and friends, British Institute for the Study of Iraq, pp. 207-236, 2010 ISBN 978-0-903472-28-9
  30. ^ Thureau-Dangin, F., "Asduni-Erim, roi de kis", Revue d'Assyriologie 8, pp. 65–79, 1909
  31. ^ Henri de Genouillac, "Premières recherches archéologiques à Kich : mission d'Henri de Genouillac 1911–1912 : rapport sur les travaux et inventaires, fac-similés, dessins, photographies et plans. Tome premier", Paris : Libr. ancienne Edouard Champion, 5, quai Malaquais, 1924
  32. ^ Henri de Genouillac, "Fouilles françaises d'El-Akhymer", Champion, 1924–25
  33. ^ Stephen Langdon, "Excavations at Kish I (1923–1924)", 1924
  34. ^ Stephen Langdon and L. C. Watelin, "Excavations at Kish III (1925–1927)", 1930
  35. ^ Stephen Langdon and L. C. Watelin, "Excavations at Kish IV (1925–1930)", 1934
  36. ^ [6] Henry Field, "The Field Museum-Oxford University expedition to Kish, Mesopotamia, 1923–1929", Chicago, Field Museum of Natural History, 1929
  37. ^ a b c d e f g h i j P. R. S. Moorey, "Kish excavations, 1923–1933 : with a microfiche catalogue of the objects in Oxford excavated by the Oxford-Field Museum, Chicago, Expedition to Kish in Iraq"Clarendon Press, 1978, ISBN 0-19-813191-7
  38. ^ a b S. Langdon and D. B. Harden, "Excavations at Kish and Barghuthiat 1933", Iraq, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 113–136, 1934
  39. ^ S. D. Ross, "The excavations at Kish. With special reference to the conclusions reached in 1928–29", in Journal of the Royal Central Asian Society, vol. 17, iss. 3, pp. 291–300, 1930
  40. ^ Henry Field, "Ancient Wheat and Barley from Kish Mesopotamia", American Anthropologist, New Series, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 303–309, 1932
  41. ^ L. H. Dudley Buxton and D. Talbot Rice, "Report on the Human Remains Found at Kish", The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. 61, pp. 57–119, 1931
  42. ^ Davies, D. C., "Unearthing the Past at Kish.", Scientific American, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 216–18, 1928
  43. ^ [7] Stephanie Dalley, "Life and Death in Early Dynastic Kish: The Evidence from Ingharra, Trench Y", in Karen L. Wilson and Deborah Bekken, "Where Kingship Descended from Heaven: Studies on Ancient Kish", Studies in Ancient Cultures 1, Chicago: Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures, pp. 23-48, 2023 ISBN 978-1-61491-092-3
  44. ^ [8] McGuire Gibson, "The First Actual Stratigraphic Profile of Part of the Y Trench", in Karen L. Wilson and Deborah Bekken, "Where Kingship Descended from Heaven: Studies on Ancient Kish", Studies in Ancient Cultures 1, Chicago: Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures, pp. 57-104, 2023 ISBN 978-1-61491-092-3
  45. ^ Zaina, F., A Radiocarbon date from Early Dynastic Kish and the Stratigraphy and Chronology of the YWN sounding at Tell Ingharra, Iraq, vol. 77(1), pp. 225–234, 2015
  46. ^ Gibson, McGuire, "Umm El-Jīr, a Town in Akkad", Journal of Near Eastern Studies, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 237–94, 1972
  47. ^ a b K. Matsumoto, "Preliminary Report on the Excavations at Kish/Hursagkalama 1988–1989", al-Rāfidān 12, pp. 261-307, 1991
  48. ^ K. Matsumoto and H. Oguchi, "Excavations at Kish, 2000", al-Rāfidān, vol. 23, pp. 1–16, 2002
  49. ^ K. Matsumoto and H. Oguchi, "News from Kish: The 2001 Japanese Work" al-Rafidan, vol. 25, pp. 1–8, 2004
  50. ^ [9]All-Rawi, Zubayda A., and Ahmed Sh Al-Banna, "Integration of Ground Penetrating Radar and Electrical Resistivity Methods to Investigate Subsurface Features at Kish Archaeological site, Babylon, Iraq", The Iraqi Geological Journal, pp. 224-232, 2023
  51. ^ [10]Al-Rawi, Zubayda A., and Ahmed Sh Al-Banna, "Application of 2D Electrical Resistivity Method and Ground Penetration Rader for Detection of the Archaeological Remains in Kish Site, Babylon, Iraq", Iraqi Journal of Science, pp. 6326-6335, 2023
  52. ^ a b Zaina, Federico (April 2016). "Tell Ingharra-East Kish in the 3rd Millennium BC: Urban Development Architecture and Functional Analysis". Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East. 1: 431.
  53. ^ a b [11]Zaina, Federico ca 20 /21 Jh (2020). The urban archaeology of early Kish: 3rd millennium BCE levels at Tell Ingharra. OrientLab Series Maior. Ante Quem. ISBN 978-88-7849-149-6.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  54. ^ [12] Guillermo Algaze, "Life and Death in Early Dynastic Kish: The Evidence from Ingharra, Trench Y", in Karen L. Wilson and Deborah Bekken, "Where Kingship Descended from Heaven: Studies on Ancient Kish", Studies in Ancient Cultures 1, Chicago: Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures, pp. 1–7, 2023 ISBN 978-1-61491-092-3
  55. ^ a b c d e f P. R. S. Moorey, "The 'Plano-Convex Building' at Kish and Early Mesopotamian Palaces", Iraq, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 83–98, 1964
  56. ^ a b c d e f g h i [13] Zaina, F., "Craft, Administration and Power in Early Dynastic Mesopotamian Public Buildings. Recovering the Plano-convex Building at Kish", Iraq, Paléorient, vol. 41, pp. 177–197, 2015
  57. ^ a b [14] E. Mackay, "Report on the excavation of the 'A' Cemetery at Kish, Mesopotamia: Part I." Anthropology, Memoirs, vol. 1, no. 1, Chicago: Field Museum, 1925
  58. ^ Torres-Rouff, Christina, William J. Pestle, and Blair M. Daverman, "Commemorating Bodies and Lives at Kish’s ‘A Cemetery’: (Re)presenting So-cial Memory", Journal of Social Archaeology, 12, pp. 193–219, 2012
  59. ^ Whelan, E., "Dating the A Cemetery at kish: A reconsideration", JFA 5, pp. 79–96, 1978
  60. ^ Hrouda, B. and karstens, k., "Zur inneren Chronologie des Friedhofes „ A „ .... bei kig", Zeitschrift für Assyriologie undvorderasiatische Archäologie 24, pp. 256–267, 1966
  61. ^ Breniquet, C., "Le cimetière 'A' de kish. Essai d 'interprétation", Iraq 46, pp. 19–28, 1984
  62. ^ a b [15] E. Mackay, "A Sumerian Palace and the "A" Cemetery: Part 2", Anthropology Memoirs, vol. 1, no. 2, Chicago: Field Museum, 1929
  63. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Marchesi, Gianni (January 2015). Sallaberger, W.; Schrakamp, I. (eds.). "Toward a Chronology of Early Dynastic Rulers in Mesopotamia". History & Philology (ARCANE 3; Turnhout): 139–156.
  64. ^ MacKay, Ernest (1925). "Sumerian Connexions with Ancient India". The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (4): 698–699. JSTOR 25220818.

Further reading

[edit]
  • [16]al-Ruwayshdi, S., "A Comparison Between the Palace at Kish and Later Palaces", Sumer 30, p. 47-49, 1974
  • Algaze, G., "Private Houses and Graves at Ingharra. A Reconsideration", Mesopotamia 18–19, pp. 135–195, 1983–84
  • Charvat, Petr, "The Kish Evidence and the Emergence of States in Mesopotamia."., Current Anthropology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 686–88, 1981
  • Charvát, Petr, "Thresher of the Goddess Sud. An Early Dynastic Sealing from Kish", Pearls, Politics and Pistachios. Essays in Anthropology and Memories on the Occasion of Susan Pollock's 65th Birthday, hrsg. v. Aydin Abar, pp. 143-150, 2021
  • Charvat, Petr, "Earliest History of the Kingdom of Kiš", P. Charvát and P.M. Vlčková (eds.), Who Was King? Who Was Not King? The Rulers and the Ruled in the Ancient Near East, Institute of Archaeology of the Academy of Sciences, Prague, pp. 16–23, 2010
  • Couturaud, Barbara, "Some inlays, a stone mace and an engraved plaque: Elements for a short note on Kish iconography of war", Ash-sharq: Bulletin of the Ancient Near East–Archaeological, Historical and Societal Studies 6.2, pp. 127-141, 2022
  • Dalley, Stephanie, "Old Babylonian Prophecies at Uruk and Kish" Opening the Tablet Box. Near Eastern Studies in Honor of Benjamin R. Foster, hrsg. v. Sarah C. Melville, Alice L. Slotsky (Culture and History of the Ancient Near East 42), pp. 85-98, 2010
  • [17] I. J. Gelb, "Sargonic Texts in the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford", Materials for the Assyrian Dictionary 5, University of Chicago Press, 1970 ISBN 0-226-62309-2
  • McGuire Gibson, "The Archaeological uses of Cuneiform Documents: Patterns of Occupation at the City of Kish", Iraq, vol. 34, iss. 2, pp. 113–123, Autumn 1972
  • Harper, Prudence O., "Tomorrow We Dig! Excerpts from Vaughn E. Crawford’s Letters and Newsletters from al-Hiba", in Leaving No Stones Unturned: Essays on the Ancient Near East and Egypt in Honor of Donald P. Hansen, edited by Erica Ehrenberg, University Park, USA: Penn State University Press, pp. 89–102, 2002
  • Harden, D.B, "A Typological Examination of Sumerian Pottery from Jamdat Nasr and kish.", Iraq 1, pp. 30–44, 1934
  • Langdon, S.H., "Tablets from Kiš", Proceedings of the Society of Babylonian Archaeology, vol. 33, pp. 185–96, 232–42, 1911
  • Molleson, Theya, and Joel Blondiaux., "Riders' bones from Kish, Iraq.", Cambridge Archaeological Journal 4.2, pp. 312–316, 1994
  • P. R. S. Moorey, "A Re-Consideration of the Excavations on Tell Ingharra (East Kish) 1923-33", Iraq, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 18–51, 1966
  • P. R. S. Moorey, "The Terracotta Plaques from Kish and Hursagkalama, c. 1850 to 1650 B.C.", Iraq, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 79–99, 1975
  • P. R. S. Moorey, "Kish Excavation 1923–1933", Oxford: Oxford Press, 1978 ISBN 9780198131915
  • P. R. S. Moorey, "Cemetery A at Kish: Grave Groups and Chronology", Iraq, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 86–128, 1970
  • Nissen, Hans "The early history of the ancient Near East, 9000–2000 B.C." Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, 1988. ISBN 0-226-58656-1, ISBN 0-226-58658-8) Elizabeth Lutzeir, trans.
  • Steinkeller, Piotr, "A Campaign of Southern City-States against Kiš as Documented in the ED IIIa Sources from Šuruppak (Fara)", Journal of Cuneiform Studies 76.1, pp. 3-26, 2024
  • Watelin, L.Ch., "Rapport sur les Fouilles de kish", Journal Asiatique 215, pp. 103–116, 1929
  • Watelin, L.Ch., "Note sur l'Industrie Lithique de kish", L'Anthropologie 39, pp. 65–76, 1929
  • Yoffee, Norman, "Towards a Biography of Kish: Notes on Urbanism and Comparison", in Literature as Politics, Politics as Literature: Essays on the Ancient Near East in Honor of Peter Machinist, edited by David S. Vanderhooft and Abraham Winitzer, University Park, USA: Penn State University Press, pp. 527–544, 2013
  • [18] Norman Yoffee, "The Economics of Ritual at Late Old Babylonian Kish", Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 312–343, 1998
  • Westenholz, Aage, "Was Kish the Center of a Territorial State in the Third Millennium?—and Other Thorny Questions", The Third Millennium, Brill, 686-715, 2020
  • Zaina, F., "Il sondaggio Y a Kiš. Cronologia, stratigrafia ed architettura", in G. Guarducci, S. Valentini (eds.), Il futuro dell’archeologia. Il Contributo dei Giovani Ricercatori. Atti del IV Convegno nazionale dei giovani archeologi, Tuscania (VT) 12-15 maggio 2011, Roma, pp. 195-204, 2011
  • Zaina, Federico, "Delving into Archaeological Archives, a Single-researcher Approach. The Case Study of Ancient Kish (Central Iraq)", Mesopotamia, vol. 000, no. 053, pp. 1-14, 2018
[edit]