Kimbell seated Bodhisattva
("Year 4 of the Great King Kanishka")
The Kimbell seated Bodhisattva is a statue of a "bodhisattva" (probably the Buddha after his renunciation of princely life, but before his Enlightenment) from the art of Mathura, now in the Kimbell Art Museum in Fort Worth, Texas. The statue is dated to 131 CE, by an inscription recording its dedication in "Year 4 of the Great King Kanishka", since the date of the beginning of Kanishka's reign is thought to be 127 CE.[4] The Kimbell seated Bodhisattva belongs to the category of the "Seated Buddha triads", which can be seen contemporaneously in the Greco-Buddhist art of Gandhara and in the art of Mathura in the early Kushan period.[5]
Style
[edit]The Kushans adopted the anthropomorphic image of the Buddha, probably developed during the 1st century CE in Mathura and Gandhara, and transformed it into a standardized mode of representation, using "confident and powerful imagery" on a grand scale.[6] Free-standing statues of the Buddha appear around this time, possibly encouraged by doctrinal changes in Buddhism allowing to depart from the aniconism that had prevailed in the Buddhist sculptures at Mathura, Bharhut or Sanchi from the end of the 2nd century BCE.[7] The Greco-Buddhist art of Gandhara appears to have fully developed around this time too, also under the rule of the Kushans, following on earlier imagery such as the Bimaran casket or the Butkara seated Buddha at the Butkara Stupa in Swat.[7]
The Kimbell seated Bodhisattva belongs to a type known as the "Kapardin" statue of the Buddha, characterized by a "Kapardin" coil of hair on the top of the head. The top of the statue was broken, and a full decorated aureola with flying attendants initially stood behind the image of the Buddha.[8] He is flanked by two attendants holding fly whisks in a sign of devotion. The relief on the pedestal centers on a dharma wheel seen edge on, on a base, with two attendants holding flowers, and two winged lions on the sides.[8]
Technically, the image mentions the "Bodhisattva" rather than the "Buddha", which would mean the Buddha just before his enlightenment, as the image of the Buddha after his enlightenment would arguably have been considered at this period to be beyond the capabilities of human illustration.[9] There has been a recurring debate about the exact identity of these Mathura statues, some claiming that they are only statues of Bodhisattavas, which is indeed the exact term used in most of the inscriptions of the statues found in Mathura. Only one or two statues of the Mathura type are known to mention the Buddha himself.[10] This could be in conformity with an ancient Buddhist prohibition against showing the Buddha himself in human form, otherwise known as aniconism in Buddhism, expressed in the Sarvastivada vinaya (rules of the early Buddhist school of the Sarvastivada): ""Since it is not permitted to make an image of the Buddha's body, I pray that the Buddha will grant that I can make an image of the attendant Bodhisattva. Is that acceptable?" The Buddha answered: "You may make an image of the Bodhisattava"".[11] However the scenes in the Isapur Buddha and the later Indrasala Buddha (dated 50-100 CE),[12] refer to events which are considered to have happened after the Buddha's enlightenment, and therefore probably represent the Buddha rather than his younger self as a Bodhisattava, or a simple attendant Bodhisattva.[13] Because of these elements, it is thought that the terms "Bodhisattva" and "Buddha" in the dedicatory inscriptions of early art of Mathura are relatively interchangeable.[13]
Inscription
[edit]The inscription is very clear and redacted in hybrid Sanskrit. A complete photograph of the inscription was published by Fussman.[14] It reads:
Maharajasya Kanishkasya sam 4 varsa 3 di 20+6 bhisusya Bodhisenasya sadhyeviharisya bhadattasya Dharmanadisya
Bodhisattvo pratistapitho svakayam cetiyakuteyam saha matapitahi saha pitasikaye Badraye
saha sarvasatvehi
"In the year 4 of King Kanihska, in the month 3 of the rains, on the 26th day, the venerable Dharmanandin, disciple of the monk Bodhisena, established this Bodhisattva in his own sanctuary. With his father and mother, and (paternal aunt?) Bhadra, with all beings".
— Transliteration and translation by Gérard Fussman.[8]
Most importantly, the inscription mentions the reign of the Kushan ruler Kanishka, and a regnal date, allowing to date precisely the statue, based on the conventionally agreed date of 127 CE for the start of the reign of Kanishka: "Year 4 of the Great King Kanishka" appears in Brahmi at the beginning of the inscription on the pedestal, implying a date of 131 CE for the dedication of the statue.[8] An alternative starting date for his reign is 78 CE, which would give a date of 82 CE for the statue.[15]
Similar statuary (1st–2nd century CE)
[edit]A relatively large number of similar statues are known from Mathura. The Kimbell Bodhisattva in one of only five known dated "Kapardin" statues of the Buddha.[18][19] The style of these statues is somewhat reminiscent of the earlier monumental Yaksha statues, usually dated to one or two centuries earlier.[20]
Several seated Buddha triads in an elaborate style are known from the Greco-Buddhist art of Gandhara, such as the Brussels Buddha, which may also be dated to the early years of Kanishka.[21][5]
-
"Indrasala architrave", detail of the Buddha in Indrasala Cave, 50-100 CE.[12]
-
Seated Buddha, inscribed "Year 32" of Kanishka (159 CE), Mathura.
-
"Mahapurusha Buddha", Mathura
-
Type of the Brussels Buddha, a similar Buddhist triad from Gandhara, probably also dating to the year 5 of Kanishka.
References
[edit]- ^ "Seated Buddha with Two Attendants". kimbellart.org. Kimbell Art Museum.
- ^ "The Buddhist Triad, from Haryana or Mathura, Year 4 of Kaniska (ad 82). Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth." in Museum (Singapore), Asian Civilisations; Krishnan, Gauri Parimoo (2007). The Divine Within: Art & Living Culture of India & South Asia. World Scientific Pub. p. 113. ISBN 9789810567057.
- ^ Close-up image of the inscription of the Kimbell Bodhisattva in Fussman, Gérard (1988). "Documents épigraphiques kouchans (V). Buddha et Bodhisattva dans l'art de Mathura : deux Bodhisattvas inscrits de l'an 4 et l'an 8". Bulletin de l'École Française d'Extrême-Orient. 77: 27, planche 2. doi:10.3406/befeo.1988.1739.
- ^ Bracey, Robert (2017). "The Date of Kanishka since 1960 (Indian Historical Review, 2017, 44(1), 1–41)". Indian Historical Review. 44: 1–41.
- ^ a b Rhie, Marylin M. (2010). Early Buddhist Art of China and Central Asia, Volume 3: The Western Ch'in in Kansu in the Sixteen Kingdoms Period and Inter-relationships with the Buddhist Art of Gandhara. BRILL. p. 105, note 95. ISBN 978-90-04-18400-8.
- ^ Quintanilla, Sonya Rhie (2007). History of Early Stone Sculpture at Mathura: Ca. 150 BCE – 100 CE. BRILL. p. 202. ISBN 9789004155374.
- ^ a b Stoneman, Richard (2019). The Greek Experience of India: From Alexander to the Indo-Greeks. Princeton University Press. pp. 439–440. ISBN 9780691185385.
- ^ a b c d e Fussman, Gérard (1988). "Documents épigraphiques kouchans (V). Buddha et Bodhisattva dans l'art de Mathura : deux Bodhisattvas inscrits de l'an 4 et l'an 8". Bulletin de l'École Française d'Extrême-Orient. 77: 6. doi:10.3406/befeo.1988.1739.
- ^ Fussman, Gérard (1988). "Documents épigraphiques kouchans (V). Buddha et Bodhisattva dans l'art de Mathura : deux Bodhisattvas inscrits de l'an 4 et l'an 8". Bulletin de l'École Française d'Extrême-Orient. 77: 15. doi:10.3406/befeo.1988.1739.
- ^ Rhi, Ju-Hyung (1994). "From Bodhisattva to Buddha: The Beginning of Iconic Representation in Buddhist Art". Artibus Asiae. 54 (3/4): 207–225. doi:10.2307/3250056. JSTOR 3250056.
- ^ Rhi, Ju-Hyung (1994). "From Bodhisattva to Buddha: The Beginning of Iconic Representation in Buddhist Art". Artibus Asiae. 54 (3/4): 220–221. doi:10.2307/3250056. JSTOR 3250056.
- ^ a b Quintanilla, Sonya Rhie (2007). History of Early Stone Sculpture at Mathura: Ca. 150 BCE – 100 CE. BRILL. pp. 237–239. ISBN 9789004155374.
- ^ a b Quintanilla, Sonya Rhie (2007). History of Early Stone Sculpture at Mathura: Ca. 150 BCE – 100 CE. BRILL. p. 237, text and note 30. ISBN 9789004155374.
- ^ Fussman, Gérard (1988). "Documents épigraphiques kouchans (V). Buddha et Bodhisattva dans l'art de Mathura : deux Bodhisattvas inscrits de l'an 4 et l'an 8". Bulletin de l'École Française d'Extrême-Orient. 77: Planche 2. doi:10.3406/befeo.1988.1739.
- ^ Fussman, Gérard (1988). "Documents épigraphiques kouchans (V). Buddha et Bodhisattva dans l'art de Mathura : deux Bodhisattvas inscrits de l'an 4 et l'an 8". Bulletin de l'École Française d'Extrême-Orient. 77: 9. doi:10.3406/befeo.1988.1739.
- ^ Annual report 1909–10. ASI. pp. 63–65.
- ^ Myer, Prudence R. (1986). "Bodhisattvas and Buddhas: Early Buddhist Images from Mathurā". Artibus Asiae. 47 (2): 111–113. doi:10.2307/3249969. ISSN 0004-3648. JSTOR 3249969.
- ^ "The five known dated kapardin Buddhas are in the following collections: Kimbell Art Museum, Ft. Worth, 4th year (82) Mathura Museum, Sonkh, 23rd year (101), Dusseldorf, Private Collection, 31st year (109); Ahicchatra Buddha, National Museum of India...."
- ^ The Asian Civilisations Museum A–Z Guide to Its Collections. National Heritage Board. 2003. p. 382. ISBN 978-981-4068-67-3.
- ^ Origin of the Buddha Image, June Coomaraswamy, pp. 300–301
- ^ Rhi, Juhyung. Identifying Several Visual Types of Gandharan Buddha Images. Archives of Asian Art 58 (2008). pp. 53–56.